They are closely matched: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 scores 48/100 and Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti scores 48/100 in our overall comparison — within 1 points. Neither is a clear winner overall, so the decision comes down to the specific features and price that matter most to you.
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Updated Nov 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score
The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 and Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti are closely matched at 49 and 49/100. The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 edges ahead on Memory and Theoretical Performance, while the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti leads on Core Specifications and Benchmark — pick the one whose strengths match what you'll actually use.
Verdict
Our overall take, at a glance
Key takeaways
- AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 and Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti are closely matched overall (within 1 points).
- AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 stands out on Theoretical Performance Performance (FP16): 17.92 TFLOPS (65% more), Theoretical Performance Performance (FP32): 8.96 TFLOPS (65% more), Memory Technology: HBM2.
- Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti counters with Core Specifications Lithography Process: 12 nm (14% less), API Support Vulkan Version: 1.4 (8% more).
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 and Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti are closely matched
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56
49
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
49
Where AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 stands out
- Theoretical Performance Performance (FP16): 17.92 TFLOPS (65% more)
- Theoretical Performance Performance (FP32): 8.96 TFLOPS (65% more)
- Memory Technology: HBM2
Where Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti stands out
- Core Specifications Lithography Process: 12 nm (14% less)
- API Support Vulkan Version: 1.4 (8% more)
In-depth analysisAI
AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Nov 2026.
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56
The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 is a discrete graphics card utilizing the advanced Vega architecture. Designed with support for high-bandwidth memory and modern compute features, it targets professional users and enthusiasts who require significant processing power. Its architecture positions it as a high-end card capable of substantial computational loads.
Best for Computational tasksBest for Professional visualizationBest for High-end applications
Pros
- Built on the GCN 5th generation architecture for professional versatility (Source 1)
- Features support for modern APIs, including Vulkan 1.3 and OpenGL 4.6 (Source 1)
- Designed with features like high-bandwidth cache and controller to handle large datasets (Source 1)
- The card draws power via a PCIe 3.0 x16 interface (Source 1)
Cons
- The product line has been succeeded by newer graphics generations, indicating it is an older model (Source 1)
- Its core architecture utilized the 14 nm FinFET fabrication process (Source 1)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
The Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is a mid-range graphics card built on Nvidia's Turing architecture using TSMC's 12 nm FinFET manufacturing process. Powered by the TU116-400-A1 graphics chip, it connects via a PCIe 3.0 x16 interface and delivers solid conventional rendering performance. It was designed for budget-conscious gamers by omitting the dedicated hardware Ray Tracing and Tensor cores present in the higher-tier RTX 20 series.
Best for Budget 1080p gaming builds focused on traditional rasterization performanceBest for Upgrading older system builds limited to PCIe 3.0 motherboard slots
Pros
- Leverages the Turing architecture with concurrent execution of integer and floating-point operations
- Manufactured on a 12 nm FinFET process for reliable mid-range performance
- Supports modern graphics APIs including Direct3D 12.0, Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6
Cons
- Lacks dedicated hardware RT (ray tracing) and Tensor (AI) cores present in RTX-branded GPUs
- Uses older PCIe 3.0 bus architecture rather than newer interface standards
- Officially discontinued by Nvidia in March 2024, limiting future product support
Value for Money
Which is the better deal for the price
Pre-filled with launch prices where known — enter today's price for an up-to-date check. Use the same currency for both.
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Performance
Higher benchmark score = faster
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 5612,060
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti12,566
Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.
Review Videos
Hand-picked expert reviews for each product
Detailed Specifications
The full spec sheet, side by side
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti comparison
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 and Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti are compared side by side above across every spec in the gpus category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 48/100 for AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 and 48/100 for Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti.
It's close — AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 (48/100) and Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (48/100) score almost the same. Pick based on price and the individual specs that matter most to you; the comparison above shows where each one pulls ahead.
Which would you buy?
Cast your voteOther Popular Comparisons
Explore more product comparisons
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX
VS
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090
VS
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT
VS
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090
VS
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56
AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT
VS
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080
VS
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56
AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE
VS
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4080
VS
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56
AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT
VS
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4080 Super
VS
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56
AMD Radeon RX 9070
VS
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti
VS