They are closely matched: Qualcomm Adreno GPU scores 33/100 and Apple M1 GPU (8 Core) scores 32/100 in our overall comparison — within 1 point. Neither is a clear winner overall, so the decision comes down to the specific features and price that matter most to you.
Qualcomm Adreno GPU vs Apple M1 GPU (8 Core)
Updated Nov 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score
For most buyers the Qualcomm Adreno GPU is the better pick — it scores 37/100 to the Apple M1 GPU (8 Core)'s 32, leading on Core Specifications and API Support. Choose the Apple M1 GPU (8 Core) instead if memory matters most to you, where it comes out ahead.
- Qualcomm Adreno GPU has no published G3D Mark result, so it scores lower.
- Apple M1 GPU (8 Core) has no published G3D Mark result, so it scores lower.
Verdict
Our overall take, at a glance
Key takeaways
- Qualcomm Adreno GPU leads Apple M1 GPU (8 Core) overall by 5 points (37 vs 32 out of 100).
- Qualcomm Adreno GPU stands out on Theoretical Performance Performance (FP16): 9.2 TFLOPS (77% more), Theoretical Performance Performance (FP32): 4.6 TFLOPS (77% more), Core Specifications Lithography Process: 4 nm (20% less).
Qualcomm Adreno GPU leads overall
Qualcomm Adreno GPU
37
Apple M1 GPU (8 Core)
32
Why it stands out
- Theoretical Performance Performance (FP16): 9.2 TFLOPS (77% more)
- Theoretical Performance Performance (FP32): 4.6 TFLOPS (77% more)
- Core Specifications Lithography Process: 4 nm (20% less)
In-depth analysisAI
AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Nov 2026.
Qualcomm Adreno GPU
The Qualcomm Adreno GPU is an integrated graphics processor built on a 4nm lithography process, designed for mobile and embedded platforms. Released in late 2023, it features 8 GB of shared system memory and achieves up to 4.6 TFLOPS of FP32 theoretical performance. It is intended for devices requiring efficient graphics rendering and modern API support within a low-power envelope.
Best for Power-conscious mobile graphics workloads requiring modern Vulkan 1.3 or DirectXBest for Compact integrated devices needing efficient FP16 and FP32 compute capabilities
Pros
- Supports modern graphics APIs including Vulkan 1.3, DirectX 12.1, and OpenCL 3.0
- Built on an efficient 4nm manufacturing process
- Delivers up to 9.2 TFLOPS of half-precision (FP16) compute performance
Cons
- Relies on a shared memory architecture with a relatively modest 67 GB/s bandwidth
- Operates at a low maximum clock frequency of 0.68 GHz
Apple M1 GPU (8 Core)
The Apple M1 GPU is an integrated graphics solution built into the M1 series of System-on-a-Chip processors. It provides graphical processing capabilities alongside the CPU and unified memory for Mac computers and iPads. This hardware solution is designed to offer high performance, especially in power efficiency, for a range of everyday computing tasks.
Best for Creative professionalsBest for Students/ProductivityBest for General use
Pros
- Integrated system approach ensures efficient data sharing between the GPU and unified memory.
- The architecture allows for strong overall performance per watt across various applications.
- Provides dedicated graphics horsepower suitable for creative workflows and media consumption.
Cons
- Though designed efficiently, it is limited to the specific hardware generation of Mac devices using M1.
- Compared to professional-grade desktop GPUs, its specialized focus may limit extreme rendering capabilities.
Value for Money
Which is the better deal for the price
Enter today's price for each product to see which offers better value. Use the same currency for both.
Qualcomm Adreno GPU
Apple M1 GPU (8 Core)
Detailed Specifications
The full spec sheet, side by side
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about Qualcomm Adreno GPU vs Apple M1 GPU (8 Core) comparison
Qualcomm Adreno GPU and Apple M1 GPU (8 Core) are compared side by side above across every spec in the gpus category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 33/100 for Qualcomm Adreno GPU and 32/100 for Apple M1 GPU (8 Core).
It's close — Qualcomm Adreno GPU (33/100) and Apple M1 GPU (8 Core) (32/100) score almost the same. Pick based on price and the individual specs that matter most to you; the comparison above shows where each one pulls ahead.
Which would you buy?
Cast your voteOther Popular Comparisons
Explore more product comparisons
Qualcomm Adreno GPU
Qualcomm Adreno X2-90
VS
Apple M1 GPU (8 Core)
Apple M1 Ultra GPU
VS
Qualcomm Adreno GPU
Qualcomm Adreno X1-85
VS
Apple M1 GPU (8 Core)
Apple M4 Max GPU
VS
Apple M1 GPU (8 Core)
Apple M4 Max GPU (40 Core)
VS
Apple A18 Pro GPU
Apple M1 GPU (8 Core)
VS
Apple M1 GPU (8 Core)
Apple M5 Max GPU
VS
Apple M1 GPU (8 Core)
Apple M2 Max GPU
VS
Apple M1 GPU (8 Core)
Apple M4 Pro GPU
VS
Apple M1 GPU (8 Core)
Apple M5 Pro GPU
VS
Apple M1 GPU (8 Core)
Apple M4 Pro GPU (20 Core)
VS
Apple M1 GPU (8 Core)
Apple M6 GPU
VS