Apple M1 GPU vs Intel Arc 140T

Updated Nov 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score

For most buyers the Intel Arc 140T is the better pick — it scores 41/100 to the Apple M1 GPU's 35, leading on API Support and Theoretical Performance. Choose the Apple M1 GPU instead if memory matters most to you, where it comes out ahead.

  • Apple M1 GPU has no published G3D Mark result, so it scores lower.

Verdict

Our overall take, at a glance

Key takeaways

  • Intel Arc 140T leads Apple M1 GPU overall by 6 points (41 vs 35 out of 100).
  • Intel Arc 140T stands out on Theoretical Performance Performance (FP32): 4.813 TFLOPS (85% more).
Intel Arc 140T leads overall
Intel Arc 140T
41
Apple M1 GPU
35
Why it stands out
  • Theoretical Performance Performance (FP32): 4.813 TFLOPS (85% more)

In-depth analysisAI

AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Nov 2026.

Apple M1 GPU

The Apple M1 is a series of ARM-based systems-on-a-chip that features an integrated GPU ranging from 7 to 64 cores depending on the specific chip tier. Manufactured using TSMC's 5 nm process, this hardware integrates the graphics processor, CPU, and system memory onto a single die. It is designed to deliver energy-efficient graphics performance across Apple's laptops, compact desktops, and high-end tablets.

Best for Portable creative work such as video and photo editing on laptops and tablets…Best for Silent or fanless computing configurations that require modest graphical…
Pros
  • Unified memory architecture allows the GPU and CPU to share the same high-speed memory pool directly.
  • Scalable graphics performance options ranging from 7-core and 8-core designs in entry-level models to 64-core configurations in workstation chips.
  • Built on an efficient 5 nm process node that delivers high graphics throughput relative to its power consumption.
Cons
  • The integrated design prevents post-purchase graphics or memory upgrades.
  • Base configurations are restricted to a maximum of 8 or 12 GB of unified memory shared between the CPU and GPU.

Intel Arc 140T

The Intel Arc 140T is an integrated graphics solution built for compact PCs and mobile devices. Operating at a maximum frequency of 2.35 GHz, it utilizes shared system memory and provides support for DirectX 12. Achieving a G3D Mark score of 6576, it delivers baseline 3D graphics performance for everyday tasks and lightweight gaming without requiring a discrete graphics card.

Best for Casual gaming and lightweight 3D rendering on integrated platformsBest for Compact PC builds needing basic DirectX 12 graphics acceleration
Pros
  • Reaches a peak clock frequency of 2.35 GHz
  • Full support for DirectX 12 API applications
  • Integrated form factor allows for power-efficient, space-saving system builds
Cons
  • Relies entirely on shared memory rather than high-speed dedicated VRAM
  • Modest 3D benchmark performance limits capability in demanding AAA games

Value for Money

Which is the better deal for the price

Enter today's price for each product to see which offers better value. Use the same currency for both.

Detailed Specifications

The full spec sheet, side by side

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Apple M1 GPU vs Intel Arc 140T comparison

Based on our overall comparison score, Apple M1 GPU rates higher at 29/100 versus 26/100 for Intel Arc 140T — a 3-point lead. Apple M1 GPU is the stronger overall pick, though the right choice still depends on which specs matter most to you; the full spec table above breaks down every difference.
Apple M1 GPU and Intel Arc 140T are compared side by side above across every spec in the gpus category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 29/100 for Apple M1 GPU and 26/100 for Intel Arc 140T.
If you want the higher-rated gpus option overall, Apple M1 GPU (29/100) edges out Intel Arc 140T (26/100). But if Intel Arc 140T is cheaper or stronger on the specific specs you care about, it can still be the better buy — use the spec table and strengths profile above to decide.

Which would you buy?

Cast your vote