They are closely matched: Apple M4 GPU (10 Core) scores 34/100 and Qualcomm Adreno GPU scores 33/100 in our overall comparison — within 1 point. Neither is a clear winner overall, so the decision comes down to the specific features and price that matter most to you.
Apple M4 GPU (10 Core) vs Qualcomm Adreno GPU
Updated Nov 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score
The Apple M4 GPU (10 Core) and Qualcomm Adreno GPU are closely matched at 35 and 34/100. The Apple M4 GPU (10 Core) edges ahead on Core Specifications and Memory, while the Qualcomm Adreno GPU leads on API Support and Theoretical Performance — pick the one whose strengths match what you'll actually use.
- Apple M4 GPU (10 Core) has no published G3D Mark result, so it scores lower.
- Qualcomm Adreno GPU has no published G3D Mark result, so it scores lower.
Verdict
Our overall take, at a glance
Key takeaways
- Apple M4 GPU (10 Core) and Qualcomm Adreno GPU are closely matched overall (within 1 point).
- Apple M4 GPU (10 Core) stands out on Memory Capacity: 16 GB (100% more), Memory Bandwidth: 120 GB/s (79% more), Core Specifications Lithography Process: 3 nm (25% less).
- Qualcomm Adreno GPU counters with Theoretical Performance Performance (FP16): 9.2 TFLOPS (30% more), Theoretical Performance Performance (FP32): 4.6 TFLOPS (30% more).
Apple M4 GPU (10 Core) and Qualcomm Adreno GPU are closely matched
Apple M4 GPU (10 Core)
35
Qualcomm Adreno GPU
34
Where Apple M4 GPU (10 Core) stands out
- Memory Capacity: 16 GB (100% more)
- Memory Bandwidth: 120 GB/s (79% more)
- Core Specifications Lithography Process: 3 nm (25% less)
Where Qualcomm Adreno GPU stands out
- Theoretical Performance Performance (FP16): 9.2 TFLOPS (30% more)
- Theoretical Performance Performance (FP32): 4.6 TFLOPS (30% more)
In-depth analysisAI
AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Nov 2026.
Apple M4 GPU (10 Core)
The Apple M4 is an advanced System-on-a-chip designed by Apple that integrates CPU, GPU, NPU, and other components onto a single piece of silicon. It represents the latest iteration in the Apple Silicon series, optimized for high performance across various devices including iMacs and MacBooks. Models featuring 10 cores are geared toward users who require significant power for demanding creative or computational workloads.
Best for creative professionalsBest for developersBest for advanced media consumption
Pros
- The architecture is built on TSMC's advanced 3nm process.
- It provides enhanced hardware acceleration features, including ray tracing support.
- Performance analysis indicates a strong single-core performance advantage.
- The integrated Neural Engine significantly boosts processing throughput (NPU) compared to predecessors.
Cons
- The M4 series utilizes an ARMv9.2a architecture, which differs from some specialized instruction set extensions.
- While powerful, its full memory potential varies depending on the specific model variant and bandwidth available.
- Its introduction timeline established it as a successor in a rapidly evolving silicon landscape.
Qualcomm Adreno GPU
The Qualcomm Adreno GPU is an integrated graphics processor built on a 4nm lithography process, designed for mobile and embedded platforms. Released in late 2023, it features 8 GB of shared system memory and achieves up to 4.6 TFLOPS of FP32 theoretical performance. It is intended for devices requiring efficient graphics rendering and modern API support within a low-power envelope.
Best for Power-conscious mobile graphics workloads requiring modern Vulkan 1.3 or DirectXBest for Compact integrated devices needing efficient FP16 and FP32 compute capabilities
Pros
- Supports modern graphics APIs including Vulkan 1.3, DirectX 12.1, and OpenCL 3.0
- Built on an efficient 4nm manufacturing process
- Delivers up to 9.2 TFLOPS of half-precision (FP16) compute performance
Cons
- Relies on a shared memory architecture with a relatively modest 67 GB/s bandwidth
- Operates at a low maximum clock frequency of 0.68 GHz
Value for Money
Which is the better deal for the price
Enter today's price for each product to see which offers better value. Use the same currency for both.
Apple M4 GPU (10 Core)
Qualcomm Adreno GPU
Review Videos
Hand-picked expert reviews for each product
Detailed Specifications
The full spec sheet, side by side
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about Apple M4 GPU (10 Core) vs Qualcomm Adreno GPU comparison
Apple M4 GPU (10 Core) and Qualcomm Adreno GPU are compared side by side above across every spec in the gpus category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 34/100 for Apple M4 GPU (10 Core) and 33/100 for Qualcomm Adreno GPU.
It's close — Apple M4 GPU (10 Core) (34/100) and Qualcomm Adreno GPU (33/100) score almost the same. Pick based on price and the individual specs that matter most to you; the comparison above shows where each one pulls ahead.
Which would you buy?
Cast your voteOther Popular Comparisons
Explore more product comparisons