They are closely matched: Qualcomm Adreno X2-90 scores 34/100 and Apple M4 GPU scores 33/100 in our overall comparison — within 1 point. Neither is a clear winner overall, so the decision comes down to the specific features and price that matter most to you.
Qualcomm Adreno X2-90 vs Apple M4 GPU
Updated Sep 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score
For most buyers the Qualcomm Adreno X2-90 is the better pick — it scores 44/100 to the Apple M4 GPU's 36, leading on API Support and Theoretical Performance. Choose the Apple M4 GPU instead if memory matters most to you, where it comes out ahead.
- Apple M4 GPU has no published G3D Mark result, so it scores lower.
Verdict
Our overall take, at a glance
Key takeaways
- Qualcomm Adreno X2-90 leads Apple M4 GPU overall by 8 points (44 vs 36 out of 100).
- Qualcomm Adreno X2-90 stands out on Theoretical Performance Performance (FP32): 7.578 TFLOPS (76% more), Theoretical Performance Performance (FP16): 15.155 TFLOPS (76% more), API Support Vulkan Version: 1.4 (17% more).
Qualcomm Adreno X2-90 leads overall
Qualcomm Adreno X2-90
44
Apple M4 GPU
36
Why it stands out
- Theoretical Performance Performance (FP32): 7.578 TFLOPS (76% more)
- Theoretical Performance Performance (FP16): 15.155 TFLOPS (76% more)
- API Support Vulkan Version: 1.4 (17% more)
In-depth analysisAI
AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Sep 2026.
Qualcomm Adreno X2-90
The Qualcomm Adreno X2-90 is an integrated graphics processor designed for highly portable and efficient computing devices. It is engineered to deliver a balance of everyday graphical capability and power efficiency, highlighted by a G3D Mark benchmark score of 9500. This GPU is primarily suited for users seeking capable multimedia performance in slim form factors without the high power consumption of dedicated graphics hardware.
Best for Casual gaming and multimedia consumption on highly portable devicesBest for Users prioritizing long battery life over heavy graphics-processing power
Pros
- Achieves a G3D Mark score of 9500, indicating solid performance for an integrated GPU class
- Optimized for thermal efficiency and low power consumption in compact devices
- Capable of handling everyday productivity, high-definition media streaming, and casual gaming
Cons
- Cannot compete with dedicated graphics cards for intensive 3D rendering or modern AAA gaming
- Lacks dedicated video memory (VRAM), relying instead on shared system memory
Apple M4 GPU
The Apple M4 GPU is an integrated graphics processor designed for mobile platforms, manufactured using an efficient 3-nanometer lithography process. Operating at a maximum frequency of 1.4 GHz with a peak power draw of 20 watts, it features a unified memory architecture sharing up to 120 GB/s of bandwidth.
Best for Power-sensitive mobile workflowsBest for Tasks requiring fast access to unified system memory
Pros
- Highly efficient 3-nanometer lithography process
- Low maximum power draw of 20 watts suitable for mobile designs
- Unified memory architecture with a 120 GB/s bandwidth rate
Cons
- API support is limited to older standards, including OpenGL 4.1 and Vulkan 1.2
Value for Money
Which is the better deal for the price
Enter today's price for each product to see which offers better value. Use the same currency for both.
Qualcomm Adreno X2-90
Apple M4 GPU
Detailed Specifications
The full spec sheet, side by side
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about Qualcomm Adreno X2-90 vs Apple M4 GPU comparison
Qualcomm Adreno X2-90 and Apple M4 GPU are compared side by side above across every spec in the gpus category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 34/100 for Qualcomm Adreno X2-90 and 33/100 for Apple M4 GPU.
It's close — Qualcomm Adreno X2-90 (34/100) and Apple M4 GPU (33/100) score almost the same. Pick based on price and the individual specs that matter most to you; the comparison above shows where each one pulls ahead.
Which would you buy?
Cast your voteOther Popular Comparisons
Explore more product comparisons