Apple M4 Max GPU (40 Core) vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

Updated Nov 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score

For most buyers the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super is the better pick — it scores 50/100 to the Apple M4 Max GPU (40 Core)'s 40, leading on API Support and Benchmark. Choose the Apple M4 Max GPU (40 Core) instead if core specifications and memory matter most to you, where it comes out ahead.

  • Apple M4 Max GPU (40 Core) has no published G3D Mark result, so it scores lower.

Verdict

Our overall take, at a glance

Key takeaways

  • Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super leads Apple M4 Max GPU (40 Core) overall by 10 points (50 vs 40 out of 100).
  • Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super stands out on Memory Technology: GDDR6, Miscellaneous Platform: Desktop, API Support Vulkan Version: 1.4 (8% more).
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super leads overall
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super
50
Apple M4 Max GPU (40 Core)
40
Why it stands out
  • Memory Technology: GDDR6
  • Miscellaneous Platform: Desktop
  • API Support Vulkan Version: 1.4 (8% more)

In-depth analysisAI

AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Nov 2026.

Apple M4 Max GPU (40 Core)

The Apple M4 Max is a System-on-a-chip manufactured by Apple Inc., part of the M4 series designed with an integrated graphics processing unit (GPU) [Source 1]. It features a high core count, supporting either 32 or 40 GPU cores [Source 1]. This chip is engineered for various computing applications and utilizes LPDDR5X unified memory [Source 1].

Best for High-performance computingBest for Applications requiring maximum GPU cores
Pros
  • Contains 32 or 40 GPU cores [Source 1]
  • The M4 Max supports up to 128GB of unified memory [Source 1]
  • Features an optimized NPU with a capability of 38 TOPS [Source 1]

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

The Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super is an entry-level desktop graphics card based on the Turing microarchitecture, powered by the TU116 processor (specifically TU116-250-KA-A1). Manufactured on a 12 nm FinFET process and using a PCIe 3.0 x16 interface, it is designed to cover budget gaming needs. It delivers core Turing enhancements while omitting the hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI hardware found in RTX series cards.

Best for Budget 1080p gaming rigs that do not prioritize real-time ray tracingBest for Upgrading legacy desktop PCs requiring Vulkan 1.4 and Direct3D 12 API support
Pros
  • Built on TSMC's 12 nm FinFET Turing microarchitecture
  • Supports concurrent execution of integer and floating-point operations via dedicated integer cores
  • Broad graphics API compatibility including Direct3D 12.0 (level 12_1) and Vulkan 1.4
Cons
  • Lacks hardware-accelerated Ray Tracing (RT) and Tensor cores
  • Limited to PCIe 3.0 system interface bandwidth

Value for Money

Which is the better deal for the price

Pre-filled with launch prices where known — enter today's price for an up-to-date check. Use the same currency for both.

Apple M4 Max GPU (40 Core)

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

Review Videos

Hand-picked expert reviews for each product

Detailed Specifications

The full spec sheet, side by side

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Apple M4 Max GPU (40 Core) vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super comparison

They are closely matched: Apple M4 Max GPU (40 Core) scores 41/100 and Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super scores 41/100 in our overall comparison — within 1 points. Neither is a clear winner overall, so the decision comes down to the specific features and price that matter most to you.
Apple M4 Max GPU (40 Core) and Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super are compared side by side above across every spec in the gpus category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 41/100 for Apple M4 Max GPU (40 Core) and 41/100 for Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super.
It's close — Apple M4 Max GPU (40 Core) (41/100) and Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super (41/100) score almost the same. Pick based on price and the individual specs that matter most to you; the comparison above shows where each one pulls ahead.

Which would you buy?

Cast your vote