They are closely matched: Apple M4 Pro GPU (16 Core) scores 35/100 and Qualcomm Adreno X2-90 scores 34/100 in our overall comparison — within 1 point. Neither is a clear winner overall, so the decision comes down to the specific features and price that matter most to you.
Apple M4 Pro GPU (16 Core) vs Qualcomm Adreno X2-90
Updated Sep 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score
For most buyers the Qualcomm Adreno X2-90 is the better pick — it scores 44/100 to the Apple M4 Pro GPU (16 Core)'s 35, leading on API Support and Theoretical Performance. Choose the Apple M4 Pro GPU (16 Core) instead if memory matters most to you, where it comes out ahead.
- Apple M4 Pro GPU (16 Core) has no published G3D Mark result, so it scores lower.
Verdict
Our overall take, at a glance
Key takeaways
- Qualcomm Adreno X2-90 leads Apple M4 Pro GPU (16 Core) overall by 9 points (44 vs 35 out of 100).
- Qualcomm Adreno X2-90 stands out on Theoretical Performance Performance (FP32): 7.578 TFLOPS (33% more), Theoretical Performance Performance (FP16): 15.155 TFLOPS (33% more), API Support Vulkan Version: 1.4 (8% more).
Qualcomm Adreno X2-90 leads overall
Qualcomm Adreno X2-90
44
Apple M4 Pro GPU (16 Core)
35
Why it stands out
- Theoretical Performance Performance (FP32): 7.578 TFLOPS (33% more)
- Theoretical Performance Performance (FP16): 15.155 TFLOPS (33% more)
- API Support Vulkan Version: 1.4 (8% more)
In-depth analysisAI
AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Sep 2026.
Apple M4 Pro GPU (16 Core)
The Apple M4 Pro is a high-performance System-on-a-chip designed for professional Apple devices like MacBooks and Mac Minis. Featuring specialized components including a 16 or 20-core GPU, it serves users who require substantial computational power for demanding creative workflows. This processor balances high throughput with the efficiency necessary for sustained operation.
Best for Video EditingBest for Graphic DesignBest for Professional Computing Workloads
Pros
- Integrated 16 or 20 cores in the dedicated GPU provide robust graphics capabilities compared to entry-level chips (Source 1).
- The system supports up to 64GB of unified memory, accommodating large project files and complex datasets (Source 1).
- It provides advanced media acceleration features, such as hardware support for Av1 decoding (Source 1).
- Its architecture is designed to deliver strong computational performance in diverse professional use cases.
Cons
- While powerful, its performance gains are specific relative to the previous M3 generation, rather than offering universal best-in-class speed across all consumer benchmarks (Source 1).
- The Pro variant is positioned below the M4 Max chip in terms of absolute maximum core count and memory bandwidth (Source 1).
Qualcomm Adreno X2-90
The Qualcomm Adreno X2-90 is an integrated graphics processor designed for highly portable and efficient computing devices. It is engineered to deliver a balance of everyday graphical capability and power efficiency, highlighted by a G3D Mark benchmark score of 9500. This GPU is primarily suited for users seeking capable multimedia performance in slim form factors without the high power consumption of dedicated graphics hardware.
Best for Casual gaming and multimedia consumption on highly portable devicesBest for Users prioritizing long battery life over heavy graphics-processing power
Pros
- Achieves a G3D Mark score of 9500, indicating solid performance for an integrated GPU class
- Optimized for thermal efficiency and low power consumption in compact devices
- Capable of handling everyday productivity, high-definition media streaming, and casual gaming
Cons
- Cannot compete with dedicated graphics cards for intensive 3D rendering or modern AAA gaming
- Lacks dedicated video memory (VRAM), relying instead on shared system memory
Value for Money
Which is the better deal for the price
Enter today's price for each product to see which offers better value. Use the same currency for both.
Apple M4 Pro GPU (16 Core)
Qualcomm Adreno X2-90
Detailed Specifications
The full spec sheet, side by side
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about Apple M4 Pro GPU (16 Core) vs Qualcomm Adreno X2-90 comparison
Apple M4 Pro GPU (16 Core) and Qualcomm Adreno X2-90 are compared side by side above across every spec in the gpus category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 35/100 for Apple M4 Pro GPU (16 Core) and 34/100 for Qualcomm Adreno X2-90.
It's close — Apple M4 Pro GPU (16 Core) (35/100) and Qualcomm Adreno X2-90 (34/100) score almost the same. Pick based on price and the individual specs that matter most to you; the comparison above shows where each one pulls ahead.
Which would you buy?
Cast your voteOther Popular Comparisons
Explore more product comparisons