Apple M4 Pro GPU vs Intel Arc B390

Updated Sep 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score

For most buyers the Intel Arc B390 is the better pick — it scores 44/100 to the Apple M4 Pro GPU's 40, leading on API Support and Benchmark. Choose the Apple M4 Pro GPU instead if memory and theoretical performance matter most to you, where it comes out ahead.

  • Apple M4 Pro GPU has no published G3D Mark result, so it scores lower.

Verdict

Our overall take, at a glance

Key takeaways

  • Intel Arc B390 and Apple M4 Pro GPU are closely matched overall (within 4 points).
  • Intel Arc B390 stands out on API Support Vulkan Version: 1.4 (17% more).
  • Apple M4 Pro GPU counters with Memory Technology: Unified, Theoretical Performance Performance (FP32): 8.5 TFLOPS (11% more).
Intel Arc B390 and Apple M4 Pro GPU are closely matched
Intel Arc B390
44
Apple M4 Pro GPU
40
Where Intel Arc B390 stands out
  • API Support Vulkan Version: 1.4 (17% more)
Where Apple M4 Pro GPU stands out
  • Memory Technology: Unified
  • Theoretical Performance Performance (FP32): 8.5 TFLOPS (11% more)

In-depth analysisAI

AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Sep 2026.

Apple M4 Pro GPU

The Apple M4 Pro GPU is an integrated mobile graphics processor built on an advanced 3-nanometer lithography process. Released in late 2024, it is engineered for power-efficient performance, delivering up to 17 TFLOPS of half-precision compute capability alongside 24 GB of shared unified memory.

Best for Mobile creative tasks requiring high-bandwidth unified memoryBest for Power-restricted setups demanding high graphical efficiency on a mobile…
Pros
  • Efficient power envelope with a maximum draw of 45 watts
  • High-speed memory architecture with 273 GB/s of bandwidth and a 256-bit bus width
  • Strong FP16 computational performance suitable for modern machine learning and rendering pipelines
Cons
  • Uses shared system memory rather than dedicated, standalone graphics memory
  • Offers older API compatibility standards, supporting OpenGL 4.1 and Vulkan 1.2

Intel Arc B390

The Intel Arc B390 is a discrete graphics card designed to provide basic graphical acceleration for budget-conscious desktop users. With an official G3D Mark benchmark score of 10,000, this GPU is positioned for light gaming, media consumption, and general productivity tasks. It serves as an entry-level option for those looking to upgrade from integrated graphics without a significant financial investment.

Best for Basic 3D acceleration in budget PC buildsBest for Light casual gaming and everyday display output
Pros
  • Sufficient performance for everyday productivity and multimedia tasks
  • Capable of running older or less demanding indie gaming titles
  • Provides a dedicated GPU option for highly budget-focused desktop builds
Cons
  • A modest benchmark score of 10,000 indicates limited capability for demanding modern AAA gaming at high resolutions

Value for Money

Which is the better deal for the price

Enter today's price for each product to see which offers better value. Use the same currency for both.

Apple M4 Pro GPU

Intel Arc B390

Review Videos

Hand-picked expert reviews for each product

Detailed Specifications

The full spec sheet, side by side

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Apple M4 Pro GPU vs Intel Arc B390 comparison

They are closely matched: Apple M4 Pro GPU scores 37/100 and Intel Arc B390 scores 37/100 in our overall comparison — within 1 points. Neither is a clear winner overall, so the decision comes down to the specific features and price that matter most to you.
Apple M4 Pro GPU and Intel Arc B390 are compared side by side above across every spec in the gpus category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 37/100 for Apple M4 Pro GPU and 37/100 for Intel Arc B390.
It's close — Apple M4 Pro GPU (37/100) and Intel Arc B390 (37/100) score almost the same. Pick based on price and the individual specs that matter most to you; the comparison above shows where each one pulls ahead.

Which would you buy?

Cast your vote