They are closely matched: Apple M4 (8 Core) scores 34/100 and Qualcomm Adreno GPU scores 33/100 in our overall comparison — within 1 point. Neither is a clear winner overall, so the decision comes down to the specific features and price that matter most to you.
Apple M4 (8 Core) vs Qualcomm Adreno GPU
Updated Nov 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score
The Apple M4 (8 Core) and Qualcomm Adreno GPU are closely matched at 35 and 33/100. The Apple M4 (8 Core) edges ahead on Core Specifications and Memory, while the Qualcomm Adreno GPU leads on API Support and Theoretical Performance — pick the one whose strengths match what you'll actually use.
- Qualcomm Adreno GPU has no published G3D Mark result, so it scores lower.
- Apple M4 (8 Core) has no published G3D Mark result, so it scores lower.
Verdict
Our overall take, at a glance
Key takeaways
- Apple M4 (8 Core) and Qualcomm Adreno GPU are closely matched overall (within 2 points).
- Apple M4 (8 Core) stands out on Memory Capacity: 16 GB (100% more), Memory Bandwidth: 120 GB/s (79% more), Core Specifications Lithography Process: 3 nm (25% less).
- Qualcomm Adreno GPU counters with Theoretical Performance Performance (FP16): 9.2 TFLOPS (15% more), Theoretical Performance Performance (FP32): 4.6 TFLOPS (15% more).
Apple M4 (8 Core) and Qualcomm Adreno GPU are closely matched
Apple M4 (8 Core)
35
Qualcomm Adreno GPU
33
Where Apple M4 (8 Core) stands out
- Memory Capacity: 16 GB (100% more)
- Memory Bandwidth: 120 GB/s (79% more)
- Core Specifications Lithography Process: 3 nm (25% less)
Where Qualcomm Adreno GPU stands out
- Theoretical Performance Performance (FP16): 9.2 TFLOPS (15% more)
- Theoretical Performance Performance (FP32): 4.6 TFLOPS (15% more)
In-depth analysisAI
AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Nov 2026.
Apple M4 (8 Core)
The Apple M4 is a System-on-a-chip (SoC) designed by Apple, featuring combined CPU, GPU, NPU, and DSP resources. It powers various devices including the iPad Pro, confirming its status as a versatile processor for modern computing tasks.
Best for Creative ProfessionalsBest for Advanced Mobile ComputingBest for AI/Machine Learning Workloads
Pros
- Incorporates advanced features like hardware-accelerated mesh shading and ray tracing in the graphics unit (Source 1).
- The Neural Processing Unit (NPU) offers advanced computational power, significantly exceeding previous generations’ performance (Source 1).
- Utilizes LPDDR5X unified memory, allowing for high memory bandwidth across various configurations (Source 1).
Cons
- High-end variants provide substantial memory capacity options, potentially limiting accessibility for budget users (Source 1).
- Some performance comparisons note significant strides in single-core performance rather than general multithreaded gains (Source 1).
Qualcomm Adreno GPU
The Qualcomm Adreno GPU is an integrated graphics processor built on a 4nm lithography process, designed for mobile and embedded platforms. Released in late 2023, it features 8 GB of shared system memory and achieves up to 4.6 TFLOPS of FP32 theoretical performance. It is intended for devices requiring efficient graphics rendering and modern API support within a low-power envelope.
Best for Power-conscious mobile graphics workloads requiring modern Vulkan 1.3 or DirectXBest for Compact integrated devices needing efficient FP16 and FP32 compute capabilities
Pros
- Supports modern graphics APIs including Vulkan 1.3, DirectX 12.1, and OpenCL 3.0
- Built on an efficient 4nm manufacturing process
- Delivers up to 9.2 TFLOPS of half-precision (FP16) compute performance
Cons
- Relies on a shared memory architecture with a relatively modest 67 GB/s bandwidth
- Operates at a low maximum clock frequency of 0.68 GHz
Value for Money
Which is the better deal for the price
Enter today's price for each product to see which offers better value. Use the same currency for both.
Apple M4 (8 Core)
Qualcomm Adreno GPU
Detailed Specifications
The full spec sheet, side by side
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about Apple M4 (8 Core) vs Qualcomm Adreno GPU comparison
Apple M4 (8 Core) and Qualcomm Adreno GPU are compared side by side above across every spec in the gpus category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 34/100 for Apple M4 (8 Core) and 33/100 for Qualcomm Adreno GPU.
It's close — Apple M4 (8 Core) (34/100) and Qualcomm Adreno GPU (33/100) score almost the same. Pick based on price and the individual specs that matter most to you; the comparison above shows where each one pulls ahead.
Which would you buy?
Cast your voteOther Popular Comparisons
Explore more product comparisons
Qualcomm Adreno GPU
Qualcomm Adreno X2-90
VS
Apple M1 Ultra GPU
Apple M4 (8 Core)
VS
Qualcomm Adreno GPU
Qualcomm Adreno X1-85
VS
Apple M4 Max GPU
Apple M4 (8 Core)
VS
Apple M4 Max GPU (40 Core)
Apple M4 (8 Core)
VS
Apple A18 Pro GPU
Apple M4 (8 Core)
VS
Apple M5 Max GPU
Apple M4 (8 Core)
VS
Apple M2 Max GPU
Apple M4 (8 Core)
VS
Apple M4 Pro GPU
Apple M4 (8 Core)
VS
Apple M5 Pro GPU
Apple M4 (8 Core)
VS
Apple M4 Pro GPU (20 Core)
Apple M4 (8 Core)
VS
Apple M6 GPU
Apple M4 (8 Core)
VS