Apple M4 (8 Core) vs Qualcomm Adreno X2-90

Updated Sep 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score

For most buyers the Qualcomm Adreno X2-90 is the better pick — it scores 44/100 to the Apple M4 (8 Core)'s 34, leading on API Support and Theoretical Performance. Choose the Apple M4 (8 Core) instead if memory matters most to you, where it comes out ahead.

Apple M4 (8 Core) has no published G3D Mark result, so it scores lower.

Verdict

Our overall take, at a glance

Qualcomm Adreno X2-90 leads overall

Qualcomm Adreno X2-90

Apple M4 (8 Core)

Why it stands out

Theoretical Performance Performance (FP32): 7.578 TFLOPS (89% more)
Theoretical Performance Performance (FP16): 15.155 TFLOPS (89% more)
API Support Vulkan Version: 1.4 (8% more)

Winner by category for Apple M4 (8 Core) vs Qualcomm Adreno X2-90
Category	Qualcomm Adreno X2-90	Apple M4 (8 Core)	Winner
Core Specifications	50	50	Tie
Memory	56	71	Apple M4 (8 Core)
API Support	77	47	Qualcomm Adreno X2-90
Theoretical Performance	54	35	Qualcomm Adreno X2-90
Benchmark	36	20	Qualcomm Adreno X2-90
Miscellaneous	32	32	Tie

In-depth analysisAI

AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Sep 2026.

Apple M4 (8 Core)

The Apple M4 is a System-on-a-chip (SoC) designed by Apple, featuring combined CPU, GPU, NPU, and DSP resources. It powers various devices including the iPad Pro, confirming its status as a versatile processor for modern computing tasks.

Best for Creative ProfessionalsBest for Advanced Mobile ComputingBest for AI/Machine Learning Workloads

Pros

Incorporates advanced features like hardware-accelerated mesh shading and ray tracing in the graphics unit (Source 1).
The Neural Processing Unit (NPU) offers advanced computational power, significantly exceeding previous generations’ performance (Source 1).
Utilizes LPDDR5X unified memory, allowing for high memory bandwidth across various configurations (Source 1).

Cons

High-end variants provide substantial memory capacity options, potentially limiting accessibility for budget users (Source 1).
Some performance comparisons note significant strides in single-core performance rather than general multithreaded gains (Source 1).

Qualcomm Adreno X2-90

The Qualcomm Adreno X2-90 is an integrated graphics processor designed for highly portable and efficient computing devices. It is engineered to deliver a balance of everyday graphical capability and power efficiency, highlighted by a G3D Mark benchmark score of 9500. This GPU is primarily suited for users seeking capable multimedia performance in slim form factors without the high power consumption of dedicated graphics hardware.

Best for Casual gaming and multimedia consumption on highly portable devicesBest for Users prioritizing long battery life over heavy graphics-processing power

Pros

Achieves a G3D Mark score of 9500, indicating solid performance for an integrated GPU class
Optimized for thermal efficiency and low power consumption in compact devices
Capable of handling everyday productivity, high-definition media streaming, and casual gaming

Cons

Cannot compete with dedicated graphics cards for intensive 3D rendering or modern AAA gaming
Lacks dedicated video memory (VRAM), relying instead on shared system memory

Value for Money

Which is the better deal for the price

Enter today's price for each product to see which offers better value. Use the same currency for both.

Apple M4 (8 Core)

Check Price on Amazon

Qualcomm Adreno X2-90

Check Price on Amazon

Detailed Specifications

The full spec sheet, side by side

Core Specifications

Feature	Apple M4 (8 Core)	Qualcomm Adreno X2-90
Base Frequency	N/A	N/A
Maximum Frequency	N/A	1.85 GHz
Lithography Process	3 nm	3 nm

Memory

Feature	Apple M4 (8 Core)	Qualcomm Adreno X2-90
Technology
Bus Width	N/A	N/A
Bandwidth	120 GB/s	N/A
Is Shared	Yes	Yes

API Support

Feature	Apple M4 (8 Core)	Qualcomm Adreno X2-90
DirectX Version	N/A	12
OpenGL Version	4.1	N/A
Vulkan Version	1.3	1.48% more
OpenCL Version	1.2	3

Theoretical Performance

Feature	Apple M4 (8 Core)	Qualcomm Adreno X2-90
Pixel Rate	62.4 GP/s	118.4 GP/s
Texture Rate	124.8 GT/s	236.8 GT/s
Performance (FP16)	8 TFLOPS	15.155 TFLOPS89% more
Performance (FP32)	4 TFLOPS	7.578 TFLOPS89% more
Performance (FP64)	N/A	1,894.4 GFLOPS

Benchmark

Feature	Apple M4 (8 Core)	Qualcomm Adreno X2-90
G3D Mark	N/A	7,723

Miscellaneous

Feature	Apple M4 (8 Core)	Qualcomm Adreno X2-90
Release Date	May 15, 2024	N/A
Platform

Specification Note

Specifications are compiled from official manufacturer data and other reliable internet sources. Some features may vary by region or model configuration.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Apple M4 (8 Core) vs Qualcomm Adreno X2-90 comparison

They are closely matched: Apple M4 (8 Core) scores 34/100 and Qualcomm Adreno X2-90 scores 34/100 in our overall comparison — within 1 points. Neither is a clear winner overall, so the decision comes down to the specific features and price that matter most to you.

Apple M4 (8 Core) and Qualcomm Adreno X2-90 are compared side by side above across every spec in the gpus category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 34/100 for Apple M4 (8 Core) and 34/100 for Qualcomm Adreno X2-90.

It's close — Apple M4 (8 Core) (34/100) and Qualcomm Adreno X2-90 (34/100) score almost the same. Pick based on price and the individual specs that matter most to you; the comparison above shows where each one pulls ahead.