Intel Arc A380 vs Intel Graphics

Updated Nov 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score

For most buyers the Intel Arc A380 is the better pick — it scores 52/100 to the Intel Graphics's 17, leading on Core Specifications and Memory. Choose the Intel Graphics instead if you want to spend less.

Verdict

Our overall take, at a glance

Intel Arc A380 leads overall

Intel Arc A380

Intel Graphics

Why it stands out

Memory Capacity: 6 GB (200% more)
Memory Bandwidth: 186 GB/s (343% more)
Theoretical Performance Performance (FP32): 4.2 TFLOPS (900% more)

Winner by category for Intel Arc A380 vs Intel Graphics
Category	Intel Arc A380	Intel Graphics	Winner
Core Specifications	100	0	Intel Arc A380
Memory	66	40	Intel Arc A380
API Support	100	0	Intel Arc A380
Theoretical Performance	56	26	Intel Arc A380
Benchmark	23	7	Intel Arc A380
Miscellaneous	89	22	Intel Arc A380

In-depth analysisAI

AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Nov 2026.

Intel Arc A380

The Intel Arc A380 is an entry-level desktop graphics card manufactured on a 6nm process node. Released in mid-2022, it features 6 GB of GDDR6 memory paired with a 96-bit bus and operates within a low 75-watt power limit. It is designed for light desktop gaming and general multimedia tasks, providing broad API support for modern software.

Best for Low-power budget desktop builds requiring a dedicated graphics accelerator underBest for Basic gaming and media consumption at 1080p resolution or lower

Pros

Modest 75W maximum power consumption minimizes power supply requirements
Equipped with 6 GB of GDDR6 video memory for entry-level workloads
Broad software compatibility with support for DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.3, and OpenCL 3.0

Cons

Narrow 96-bit memory bus restricts memory bandwidth to 186 GB/s
Modest FP32 compute capability of 4.2 TFLOPS limits graphics performance in demanding titles

Intel Graphics

Intel Graphics Technology refers to the integrated graphics processor (IGP) series embedded directly within Intel CPU packages, ranging from early HD Graphics to modern Xe2-based integrated Arc GPUs found in processors like Lunar Lake (130V and 140V). Designed for laptops and desktops, these solutions handle daily visual tasks, multi-monitor displays, and media processing without requiring a standalone graphics card. Modern implementations use architectures such as Xe-LPG and Xe2, manufactured by Intel and TSMC, to power integrated graphics across Intel Core and Core Ultra lineups.

Best for Energy-efficient video playback and media encoding on thin-and-light laptops.Best for Everyday productivity and multi-display office desktop configurations without a

Pros

Integrated directly into CPU packages, saving power and space in compact laptop designs.
Includes dedicated hardware acceleration like Intel Quick Sync Video for efficient video encoding and decoding.
Evolving Xe and Xe2 architectures bring higher execution unit counts and improved 3D graphics capabilities compared to older integrated solutions.

Cons

Shares system memory and power limits with the CPU, restricting gaming and heavy rendering performance compared to dedicated graphics cards.
Graphics performance and API feature support vary significantly across different CPU generations and tier levels.

Value for Money

Which is the better deal for the price

Pre-filled with launch prices where known — enter today's price for an up-to-date check. Use the same currency for both.

Intel Arc A380

Check Price on Amazon

Intel Graphics

Check Price on Amazon

Performance

Higher benchmark score = faster

Intel Arc A3806,322

Intel Graphics3,260

See the raw benchmark values →

Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.

Detailed Specifications

The full spec sheet, side by side

Core Specifications

Feature	Intel Arc A380	Intel Graphics
Base Frequency	2 GHz	N/A
Base Power	N/A	N/A
Maximum Frequency	2.05 GHz	N/A
Maximum Power	75 W	N/A
Lithography Process	6 nm	N/A

Memory

Feature	Intel Arc A380	Intel Graphics
Capacity	6 GB200% more	2 GB
Technology
Bus Width	96 bit	N/A
Bandwidth	186 GB/s343% more	42 GB/s
Is Shared	No	Yes

API Support

Feature	Intel Arc A380	Intel Graphics
DirectX Version	12	N/A
OpenGL Version	4.6	N/A
Vulkan Version	1.3	N/A
OpenCL Version	3	N/A

Theoretical Performance

Feature	Intel Arc A380	Intel Graphics
Pixel Rate	65.6 GP/s	N/A
Texture Rate	131.1 GT/s	N/A
Performance (FP16)	8.397 TFLOPS	N/A
Performance (FP32)	4.2 TFLOPS900% more	0.42 TFLOPS
Performance (FP64)	N/A	N/A

Benchmark

Feature	Intel Arc A380	Intel Graphics
G3D Mark	6,32294% more	3,260

Miscellaneous

Feature	Intel Arc A380	Intel Graphics
Release Date	June 14, 2022	N/A
Platform

Specification Note

Specifications are compiled from official manufacturer data and other reliable internet sources. Some features may vary by region or model configuration.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Intel Arc A380 vs Intel Graphics comparison

Based on our overall comparison score, Intel Arc A380 rates higher at 32/100 versus 20/100 for Intel Graphics — a 12-point lead. Intel Arc A380 is the stronger overall pick, though the right choice still depends on which specs matter most to you; the full spec table above breaks down every difference.

Intel Arc A380 and Intel Graphics are compared side by side above across every spec in the gpus category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 32/100 for Intel Arc A380 and 20/100 for Intel Graphics.

If you want the higher-rated gpus option overall, Intel Arc A380 (32/100) edges out Intel Graphics (20/100). But if Intel Graphics is cheaper or stronger on the specific specs you care about, it can still be the better buy — use the spec table and strengths profile above to decide.