Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650

Updated Nov 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score

For most buyers the Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 is the better pick — it scores 85/100 to the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650's 29, leading on Memory and Theoretical Performance. Choose the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 instead if core specifications matters most to you, where it comes out ahead.

Verdict

Our overall take, at a glance

Key takeaways

  • Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 leads Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 overall by 56 points (85 vs 29 out of 100).
  • Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 stands out on Core Specifications Maximum Power: 450 W (500% more), Memory Capacity: 24 GB (500% more), Memory Bandwidth: 1,008 GB/s (688% more).
  • Best value: Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 (from $149) — the strongest score-per-dollar of the two.
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 leads overall
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090
85
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
29
Why it stands out
  • Core Specifications Maximum Power: 450 W (500% more)
  • Memory Capacity: 24 GB (500% more)
  • Memory Bandwidth: 1,008 GB/s (688% more)

In-depth analysisAI

AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Nov 2026.

Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090

The GeForce RTX 4090 is the flagship graphics card in Nvidia's consumer GPU family, succeeding the GeForce RTX 30 series. It is based on Nvidia's Ada Lovelace architecture and features third-generation RT cores and fourth-generation Tensor Cores for hardware acceleration.

Best for High-end graphics tasks
Pros
  • Features a TSMC 4N process designed by Nvidia
  • Includes three-generation Ray Tracing Cores for accelerated ray tracing
  • Supports OpenGL 4.6, Vulkan 1.4, and DirectX Direct3D 12.0 Ultimate APIs
  • Features dual NVENC with 8K 10-bit 120FPS AV1 fixed function hardware encoding
Cons
  • No NVLink support
  • Double-precision performance is 1/64 of single-precision performance

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650

The Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 is an entry-level desktop graphics card built on TSMC's 12nm FinFET process and powered by the Turing-based TU117 processor (specifically the TU117-300 chip). Operating at a low 75W thermal design power, it features 896 CUDA cores paired with 4GB of memory over a 128-bit bus in GDDR5 and GDDR6 variants. It was designed for budget-conscious gamers seeking basic 1080p performance without needing extensive power supply upgrades.

Best for Budget 1080p gaming rigs running on standard PCIe slot powerBest for Compact PC builds constrained by modest power supplies
Pros
  • Low 75W power requirement suitable for entry-level desktop builds
  • Available with 4GB of GDDR5 or faster GDDR6 memory across a 128-bit bus
  • Efficient Turing architecture built on TSMC 12nm FinFET technology
Cons
  • Lacks dedicated hardware RT and Tensor cores for real-time ray tracing and AI tasks
  • Uses an older Volta-generation NVENC video encoder rather than the upgraded Turing encoder
  • Discontinued product line offering limited headroom for modern demanding titles

Value for Money

Which is the better deal for the price

Pre-filled with launch prices where known — enter today's price for an up-to-date check. Use the same currency for both.

Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650

Performance

Higher benchmark score = faster

Nvidia GeForce RTX 409038,037
Nvidia GeForce GTX 16507,865

Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.

Review Videos

Hand-picked expert reviews for each product

Detailed Specifications

The full spec sheet, side by side

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 comparison

Based on our overall comparison score, Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 rates higher at 92/100 versus 34/100 for Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 — a 58-point lead. Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 is the stronger overall pick, though the right choice still depends on which specs matter most to you; the full spec table above breaks down every difference.
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 and Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 are compared side by side above across every spec in the gpus category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 92/100 for Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 and 34/100 for Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650.
At launch, Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 was the more affordable option ($149) versus Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 ($1599). Weigh that against the overall scores (92/100 vs 34/100) and the value-for-money meter above to judge whether the higher-rated model justifies its price for your needs. Current retail prices vary — check the retailer.
If you want the higher-rated gpus option overall, Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 (92/100) edges out Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 (34/100). But if Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 is cheaper or stronger on the specific specs you care about, it can still be the better buy — use the spec table and strengths profile above to decide.

Which would you buy?

Cast your vote