They are closely matched: Audio-Technica ATH-M40x scores 26/100 and AKG K371 scores 25/100 in our overall comparison — within 1 point. Neither is a clear winner overall, so the decision comes down to the specific features and price that matter most to you.
Audio-Technica ATH-M40x vs AKG K371
Updated Jun 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score
The Audio-Technica ATH-M40x and AKG K371 are closely matched at 26 and 25/100. The Audio-Technica ATH-M40x edges ahead on Comfort & Build, while the AKG K371 leads on value — pick the one whose strengths match what you'll actually use.
- Sound quality isn't scored yet (we have no measured audio data), so the score covers features, battery, noise cancelling and build.
Verdict
Our overall take, at a glance
Key takeaways
- Audio-Technica ATH-M40x and AKG K371 are closely matched overall (within 1 point).
- Audio-Technica ATH-M40x stands out on Comfort & Build Weight: 240 g (6% less).
Audio-Technica ATH-M40x and AKG K371 are closely matched
Audio-Technica ATH-M40x
26
AKG K371
25
Where Audio-Technica ATH-M40x stands out
- Comfort & Build Weight: 240 g (6% less)
Watch-outs
Compromises to know before you buy
Audio-Technica ATH-M40x
- No microphone — you can't take calls.
AKG K371
- No microphone — you can't take calls.
In-depth analysisAI
AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Jun 2026.
Audio-Technica ATH-M40x
The Audio-Technica ATH-M40x is an over-ear, dynamic closed-back headphone designed primarily for studio monitoring and audio production. Introduced as part of a remastered M-Series lineup in 2014, it features 40mm drivers with neodymium magnets and copper-clad aluminum voice coils. Operating with a 35-ohm impedance and a frequency response of 15 to 24,000 Hz, it is tuned to provide a flatter, more accurate sound profile with minimal coloration.
Best for audio mixing and studio monitoring requiring accurate, uncolored frequency…Best for content creation and tracking where a lightweight, closed-back design is…
Pros
- Equipped with two different detachable cables (a 1.2-meter straight and a 3-meter coiled cable) for physical flexibility
- Tuned for a relatively flat frequency response, helping to deliver accurate and uncolored audio reproduction
- Weighs 240 grams, presenting a relatively lightweight option for long listening sessions
- Includes a screw-on 6.5mm adapter to ensure compatibility with professional audio equipment
Cons
- Includes only a basic soft pouch for storage, offering limited physical protection compared to a hardshell case
AKG K371
The AKG K371 is a closed-back, over-ear headphone designed for audio professionals, studio tracking, and content creators. Tuned closely to the Harman target curve, it provides a balanced and accurate frequency response for monitoring without requiring heavy amplification. Its collapsible design makes it highly portable for creators working on the go.
Best for Portable audio mixing and editing where a reliable, neutral reference frequency Best for Podcasting and vocal tracking requiring a closed-back design to prevent…
Pros
- Highly accurate sound signature tuned closely to the Harman target curve
- Folding earcup design makes them exceptionally portable for studio headphones
- Includes multiple detachable cables (coiled and straight) for versatile connectivity
Cons
- Bass response is highly dependent on achieving a perfect seal, which can be disrupted by glasses or thick hair
- Plastic-heavy construction and hinge mechanisms feel less robust than some dedicated studio competitors
Value for Money
Which is the better deal for the price
Pre-filled with launch prices where known — enter today's price for an up-to-date check. Use the same currency for both.
Audio-Technica ATH-M40x
AKG K371
Physical Comparison
Weigh them up, then compare real dimensions in 3D
Audio-Technica ATH-M40xAKG K371
AKG K371 is 15 g (6%) heavier than Audio-Technica ATH-M40x.
Review Videos
Hand-picked expert reviews for each product
Detailed Specifications
The full spec sheet, side by side
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about Audio-Technica ATH-M40x vs AKG K371 comparison
Audio-Technica ATH-M40x and AKG K371 are compared side by side above across every spec in the headphones category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 26/100 for Audio-Technica ATH-M40x and 25/100 for AKG K371.
At launch, Audio-Technica ATH-M40x was the more affordable option ($99) versus AKG K371 ($149). Weigh that against the overall scores (26/100 vs 25/100) and the value-for-money meter above to judge whether the higher-rated model justifies its price for your needs. Current retail prices vary — check the retailer.
It's close — Audio-Technica ATH-M40x (26/100) and AKG K371 (25/100) score almost the same. Pick based on price and the individual specs that matter most to you; the comparison above shows where each one pulls ahead.
Which would you buy?
Cast your voteOther Popular Comparisons
Explore more product comparisons
Audio-Technica ATH-ADX7000
Audio-Technica ATH-M40x
VS
AKG K371
AKG K712 Pro
VS
Audio-Technica ATH-M40x
Audio-Technica ATH-M50x
VS
Audio-Technica ATH-M40x
Marshall Monitor III ANC
VS
AKG K371
Marshall Monitor III ANC
VS
Audio-Technica ATH-M40x
Sennheiser Accentum Wireless
VS
AKG K371
Sennheiser Accentum Wireless
VS
Audio-Technica ATH-M40x
JBL Live 670NC
VS
AKG K371
JBL Live 670NC
VS
Audio-Technica ATH-M40x
Sennheiser Momentum 5 Wireless
VS
AKG K371
Sennheiser Momentum 5 Wireless
VS
Audio-Technica ATH-M40x
Nothing Headphone (a)
VS