Based on our overall comparison score, Marshall Monitor III ANC rates higher at 84/100 versus 58/100 for Beats Solo 4 — a 26-point lead. Marshall Monitor III ANC is the stronger overall pick, though the right choice still depends on which specs matter most to you; the full spec table above breaks down every difference.
Marshall Monitor III ANC vs Beats Solo 4
Updated Sep 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score
For most buyers the Marshall Monitor III ANC is the better pick — it scores 84/100 to the Beats Solo 4's 52, leading on Noise Cancelling and Wireless. Choose the Beats Solo 4 instead if comfort & build matters most to you, where it comes out ahead.
- Sound quality isn't scored yet (we have no measured audio data), so the score covers features, battery, noise cancelling and build.
Verdict
Our overall take, at a glance
Key takeaways
- Marshall Monitor III ANC leads Beats Solo 4 overall by 32 points (84 vs 52 out of 100).
- Best value: Beats Solo 4 (from $200) — the strongest score-per-dollar of the two.
Marshall Monitor III ANC leads overall
Marshall Monitor III ANC
84
Beats Solo 4
52
Watch-outs
Compromises to know before you buy
Marshall Monitor III ANC
No notable compromises found.
Beats Solo 4
- No active noise cancelling.
- No multipoint — can't stay paired to two devices at once.
In-depth analysisAI
AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Sep 2026.
Marshall Monitor III ANC
The Marshall Monitor III ANC is a pair of premium over-ear wireless headphones designed for music enthusiasts who value classic styling alongside modern noise-canceling technology. It features active noise cancellation, a highly collapsible design for portability, and a signature rugged aesthetic. This model aims to compete with major flagship headphones by balancing tactile physical controls with extended battery performance.
Best for Travelers needing maximum battery longevity between chargesBest for Listeners who prefer physical, tactile controls over touch-sensitive panels
Pros
- Exceptionally long battery life ideal for multi-day use
- Highly collapsible design makes them easy to pack and transport
- Tactile multi-directional control knob offers intuitive playback adjustments
- Durable, classic design inspired by iconic amplifier styling
Cons
- Active noise cancellation performance may not entirely match the industry-leading isolation of key competitors
Beats Solo 4
The Beats Solo 4 are lightweight, wireless on-ear headphones priced at $199, designed for casual listeners who prioritize portability and long playback times. They feature a compact frame with comfortable memory foam ear cushions and support both wireless playback and a traditional 3.5mm wired connection. However, they lack active noise cancellation and do not offer any sound customization options.
Best for all-day wear and extended listening without frequent rechargingBest for users who prefer a lightweight, on-ear physical design over bulky over-ear…
Pros
- Extremely long battery life, making them reliable for multi-day use.
- Lightweight and highly compact design with comfortable memory foam cups.
- Dual connectivity options with support for both wireless play and a 3.5mm physical jack.
- Crowd-pleasing sound signature featuring prominent low frequencies and clear stereo separation.
Cons
- No active noise cancellation (ANC), which allows ambient environment noise to bleed in.
- Very limited software customization, with an app that lacks any equalizer or audio tuning adjustments.
- Audio codec support is limited to basic AAC.
Value for Money
Which is the better deal for the price
Pre-filled with launch prices where known — enter today's price for an up-to-date check. Use the same currency for both.
Marshall Monitor III ANC
Beats Solo 4
Physical Comparison
Weigh them up, then compare real dimensions in 3D
Marshall Monitor III ANCBeats Solo 4
Marshall Monitor III ANC is 33 g (15%) heavier than Beats Solo 4.
Review Videos
Hand-picked expert reviews for each product
Detailed Specifications
The full spec sheet, side by side
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about Marshall Monitor III ANC vs Beats Solo 4 comparison
Marshall Monitor III ANC and Beats Solo 4 are compared side by side above across every spec in the headphones category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 84/100 for Marshall Monitor III ANC and 58/100 for Beats Solo 4.
At launch, Beats Solo 4 was the more affordable option ($200) versus Marshall Monitor III ANC ($350). Weigh that against the overall scores (84/100 vs 58/100) and the value-for-money meter above to judge whether the higher-rated model justifies its price for your needs. Current retail prices vary — check the retailer.
If you want the higher-rated headphones option overall, Marshall Monitor III ANC (84/100) edges out Beats Solo 4 (58/100). But if Beats Solo 4 is cheaper or stronger on the specific specs you care about, it can still be the better buy — use the spec table and strengths profile above to decide.
Which would you buy?
Cast your voteOther Popular Comparisons
Explore more product comparisons
Marshall Major V
Marshall Monitor III ANC
VS
Beats Solo 4
Beats Studio Pro
VS
Marshall Monitor III ANC
Sennheiser Accentum Wireless
VS
Beats Solo 4
Sennheiser Accentum Wireless
VS
JBL Live 670NC
Marshall Monitor III ANC
VS
Beats Solo 4
JBL Live 670NC
VS
Marshall Monitor III ANC
Sennheiser Momentum 5 Wireless
VS
Beats Solo 4
Sennheiser Momentum 5 Wireless
VS
Marshall Monitor III ANC
Nothing Headphone (a)
VS
Beats Solo 4
Nothing Headphone (a)
VS
Marshall Monitor III ANC
Sennheiser Accentum Plus
VS
Beats Solo 4
Sennheiser Accentum Plus
VS