Marshall Monitor III ANC vs Beyerdynamic DT 770 Pro
Verdict
Our overall take, at a glance
Key takeaways
Marshall Monitor III ANC leads Beyerdynamic DT 770 Pro overall by 62 points (85 vs 23 out of 100).
Marshall Monitor III ANC stands out on Comfort & Build Weight: 250 g.
Marshall Monitor III ANC leads overall
Marshall Monitor III ANC
85
Beyerdynamic DT 770 Pro
23
Why it stands out
Comfort & Build Weight: 250 g
Strengths Profile
Bigger shape = stronger. Whoever reaches further wins that category.
In-depth analysisAI
AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Jul 2026.
Marshall Monitor III ANC
The Marshall Monitor III ANC is a pair of premium over-ear wireless headphones designed for music enthusiasts who value classic styling alongside modern noise-canceling technology. It features active noise cancellation, a highly collapsible design for portability, and a signature rugged aesthetic. This model aims to compete with major flagship headphones by balancing tactile physical controls with extended battery performance.
Best for Travelers needing maximum battery longevity between chargesBest for Listeners who prefer physical, tactile controls over touch-sensitive panels
Pros
Exceptionally long battery life ideal for multi-day use
Highly collapsible design makes them easy to pack and transport
Tactile multi-directional control knob offers intuitive playback adjustments
Durable, classic design inspired by iconic amplifier styling
Cons
Active noise cancellation performance may not entirely match the industry-leading isolation of key competitors
Video — reviews used (1)
A hands-on video review evaluating the overall value, comfort, noise cancellation, and sound quality compared to other major flagship headphones.
Generated Jul 4, 2026
Beyerdynamic DT 770 Pro
The Beyerdynamic DT 770 Pro is a classic pair of closed-back dynamic over-ear headphones built for music producers, engineers, and tracking artists. Because they are analog studio headphones, they do not feature an onboard processor, but are instead characterized by their high 250-ohm impedance, wide 5 to 35,000 Hz frequency response, and soft velour ear cushions.
Best for Audio mixing and tracking in recording studios where sound leakage must be avoidBest for Critical listening sessions paired with dedicated audio interfaces or dedicated
Pros
High physical sound isolation of 18dB helps minimize bleed during recording
Comfortable velour ear pads facilitate extended listening and editing sessions
Durable build quality suitable for long-term professional studio use
Extremely wide frequency response ranging from 5 Hz to 35,000 Hz
Cons
The high 250-ohm impedance means they cannot be easily driven by standard consumer devices without an external amplifier
The three-meter coiled cable is permanently attached, making it difficult to swap or replace if damaged
At 380 grams without the cable, they are relatively heavy compared to some portable alternatives
Beyerdynamic DT 770 Pro is 20 g (8%) heavier than Marshall Monitor III ANC.
Review Videos
Hand-picked expert reviews for each product
Detailed Specifications
The full spec sheet, side by side
Audio
Feature
Marshall Monitor III ANC
Beyerdynamic DT 770 Pro
Driver Type
Dynamic
Dynamic
Driver Size
32 mm
45 mm
Frequency Response
20-20,000 Hz
5 Hz - 35,000 Hz
Impedance
35
80
Sensitivity
117
96
Noise Cancelling
Feature
Marshall Monitor III ANC
Beyerdynamic DT 770 Pro
Active Noise Cancelling
Yes
No
Transparency Mode
Yes
No
Wireless
Feature
Marshall Monitor III ANC
Beyerdynamic DT 770 Pro
Wireless
Yes
No
Bluetooth Version
N/A
Supported Codecs
SBC, MPEG-2 AAC
N/A
Multipoint Connection
Yes
No
Battery
Feature
Marshall Monitor III ANC
Beyerdynamic DT 770 Pro
Battery Life (ANC On)
70 h
N/A
Quick Charge
Yes
No
Comfort & Build
Feature
Marshall Monitor III ANC
Beyerdynamic DT 770 Pro
Weight
250 g
270 g
Folding Design
Yes
No
Water Resistance
N/A
N/A
Dimensions
15.5 × 22 × 7 cm
N/A
Connectivity
Feature
Marshall Monitor III ANC
Beyerdynamic DT 770 Pro
Wired Connection
USB-C to 3.5mm
3.5mm + 6.3mm adapter
Detachable Cable
No
No
Built-in Microphone
Yes
No
Specification Note
Specifications are compiled from official manufacturer data and other reliable internet sources. Some features may vary by region or model configuration.
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about Marshall Monitor III ANC vs Beyerdynamic DT 770 Pro comparison
Based on our overall comparison score, Marshall Monitor III ANC rates higher at 92/100 versus 38/100 for Beyerdynamic DT 770 Pro — a 54-point lead. Marshall Monitor III ANC is the stronger overall pick, though the right choice still depends on which specs matter most to you; the full spec table above breaks down every difference.
Marshall Monitor III ANC and Beyerdynamic DT 770 Pro are compared side by side above across every spec in the headphones category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 92/100 for Marshall Monitor III ANC and 38/100 for Beyerdynamic DT 770 Pro.
At launch, Beyerdynamic DT 770 Pro was the more affordable option ($169) versus Marshall Monitor III ANC ($350). Weigh that against the overall scores (92/100 vs 38/100) and the value-for-money meter above to judge whether the higher-rated model justifies its price for your needs. Current retail prices vary — check the retailer.
If you want the higher-rated headphones option overall, Marshall Monitor III ANC (92/100) edges out Beyerdynamic DT 770 Pro (38/100). But if Beyerdynamic DT 770 Pro is cheaper or stronger on the specific specs you care about, it can still be the better buy — use the spec table and strengths profile above to decide.