They are closely matched: LG UltraGear 39GX950B scores 83/100 and ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27UCWM scores 81/100 in our overall comparison — within 2 points. Neither is a clear winner overall, so the decision comes down to the specific features and price that matter most to you.
LG UltraGear 39GX950B vs ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27UCWM
Verdict
Our overall take, at a glance
Key takeaways
- LG UltraGear 39GX950B and ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27UCWM are closely matched overall (within 1 points).
- LG UltraGear 39GX950B stands out on Panel Screen Size: 39 in, Panel Resolution: 5120 × 2160 px, Image Quality Brightness (typical): 335 nits.
- ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27UCWM counters with Panel Pixel Density: 166, Performance Refresh Rate: 240 Hz.
- Best value: ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27UCWM (from $1,099) — the strongest score-per-dollar of the two.
LG UltraGear 39GX950B and ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27UCWM are closely matched
LG UltraGear 39GX950B
79
ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27UCWM
79
Where LG UltraGear 39GX950B stands out
- Panel Screen Size: 39 in
- Panel Resolution: 5120 × 2160 px
- Image Quality Brightness (typical): 335 nits
Where ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27UCWM stands out
- Panel Pixel Density: 166
- Performance Refresh Rate: 240 Hz
In-depth analysisAI
AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Jul 2026.
LG UltraGear 39GX950B
AI analysis isn't ready yet
We haven't generated an in-depth write-up for LG UltraGear 39GX950B yet. The specs, scores and strengths profile above still cover it — check back later for the AI summary.
ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27UCWM
The ASUS ROG Swift OLED (modeled as the PG27UCDM) is a premium 27-inch gaming monitor designed for enthusiasts and competitive players who demand both high visual fidelity and top-tier motion clarity. It features a 240Hz OLED panel displaying a 4K resolution, offering a sharp pixel density alongside the rapid refresh rates typical of high-end gaming displays. This screen leverages self-emissive pixels to deliver deep blacks and exceptional contrast.
Best for Competitive multiplayer gaming requiring rapid motion response and high frame raBest for Immersive HDR gaming and high-fidelity media consumption in low-light settings
Pros
- Extremely fast response times that virtually eliminate motion blur in fast-paced games
- High-density 4K resolution combined with a fluid 240Hz refresh rate
- Excellent HDR performance powered by per-pixel dimming and high peak contrast
Cons
- Inherent risk of permanent image retention and burn-in associated with OLED panels
- Subpixel layout configuration that can compromise text clarity and sharpness during desktop productivity tasks
Value for Money
Which is the better deal for the price
Pre-filled with launch prices where known — enter today's price for an up-to-date check. Use the same currency for both.
LG UltraGear 39GX950B
ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27UCWM
Physical Comparison
Weight, side by side
LG UltraGear 39GX950B
6.8kg
Weight
Review Videos
Hand-picked expert reviews for each product
Detailed Specifications
The full spec sheet, side by side
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about LG UltraGear 39GX950B vs ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27UCWM comparison
LG UltraGear 39GX950B and ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27UCWM are compared side by side above across every spec in the monitors category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 83/100 for LG UltraGear 39GX950B and 81/100 for ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27UCWM.
At launch, ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27UCWM was the more affordable option ($1099) versus LG UltraGear 39GX950B ($1800). Weigh that against the overall scores (83/100 vs 81/100) and the value-for-money meter above to judge whether the higher-rated model justifies its price for your needs. Current retail prices vary — check the retailer.
It's close — LG UltraGear 39GX950B (83/100) and ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27UCWM (81/100) score almost the same. Pick based on price and the individual specs that matter most to you; the comparison above shows where each one pulls ahead.