
Samsung QN990F Neo QLED 8K 65
Samsung S95H OLED 65
VS
Updated Nov 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score
S95H OLED 65 wins 2 of 6 categories · UR9SG 65 wins 1
| Category | UR9SG 65S95H OLED 65 | Lead |
|---|---|---|
| Picture Quality | Tie | |
| Gaming | +18 | |
| Panel | Tie | |
| HDR | +53 | |
| Audio | Tie | |
| Connectivity | +26 |
UR9SG 65 is 3.5 kg (17%) heavier than S95H OLED 65.
Launch prices — enter today's prices (same currency for both).
Compromises to know before you buy
No notable compromises found.
| Feature | UR9SG 65 | S95H OLED 65 |
|---|---|---|
Screen Size | 65 in | 65 in |
Resolution | 3840 × 2160 px | 3840 × 2160 px |
Panel Technology | ||
Refresh Rate | 180 Hz9% more | 165 Hz |
| Feature | UR9SG 65 | S95H OLED 65 |
|---|---|---|
Peak Brightness (HDR) | N/A | 2,704 nits |
Local Dimming | Yes | N/A |
| Feature | UR9SG 65 | S95H OLED 65 |
|---|---|---|
HDR Formats | ||
Dolby Vision | Yes | No |
| Feature | UR9SG 65 | S95H OLED 65 |
|---|---|---|
Gaming Refresh Rate (VRR Max) | 180 Hz9% more | 165 Hz |
HDMI 2.1 Ports | 3 | 433% more |
| Feature | UR9SG 65 | S95H OLED 65 |
|---|---|---|
Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Audio Output Power | 80 W14% more | 70 W |
| Feature | UR9SG 65 | S95H OLED 65 |
|---|---|---|
Total HDMI Ports | 3 | 433% more |
Specification Note
Specifications are compiled from official manufacturer data and other reliable internet sources. Some features may vary by region or model configuration.