Based on our overall comparison score, LG OLED evo G5 65 rates higher at 85/100 versus 82/100 for Samsung S95F OLED 65 — a 3-point lead. LG OLED evo G5 65 is the stronger overall pick, though the right choice still depends on which specs matter most to you; the full spec table above breaks down every difference.
LG OLED evo G5 65 vs Samsung S95F OLED 65
Verdict
Our overall take, at a glance
Key takeaways
- LG OLED evo G5 65 and Samsung S95F OLED 65 are closely matched overall (within 2 points).
- Samsung S95F OLED 65 counters with Audio Output Power: 70 W.
- Best value: Samsung S95F OLED 65 (from $3,299) — the strongest score-per-dollar of the two.
LG OLED evo G5 65 and Samsung S95F OLED 65 are closely matched
LG OLED evo G5 65
84
Samsung S95F OLED 65
82
Where Samsung S95F OLED 65 stands out
- Audio Output Power: 70 W
In-depth analysisAI
AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Jul 2026.
LG OLED evo G5 65
AI analysis isn't ready yet
We haven't generated an in-depth write-up for LG OLED evo G5 65 yet. The specs, scores and strengths profile above still cover it — check back later for the AI summary.
Samsung S95F OLED 65
The Samsung S95F OLED 65 is a flagship 4K QD-OLED television built for premium home entertainment and high-performance gaming. Driven by the NQ4 AI Gen3 processor, this model is distinguished by its high peak brightness capability and a specialized matte, glare-free screen coating designed to combat reflections in bright rooms.
Best for Bright living rooms or spaces with severe ambient light and reflection issuesBest for Enthusiast gaming configurations that leverage high-refresh-rate displays up to Best for Clean, minimalist home theater installations requiring a single-cable connection
Pros
- Superior reflection mitigation and glare reduction due to a specialized matte screen finish
- High peak brightness and exceptional color accuracy in both HDR and SDR content
- Excellent responsiveness for gaming with support for refresh rates up to 165Hz
- Streamlined cable management and wall-mounting options enabled by an external One Connect box
Cons
- Premium price point that represents a steep financial investment compared to mid-tier OLED alternatives
- Matte screen coating can be divisive and may alter perceived black levels when exposed to direct light
- Lack of native Dolby Vision support, which is a common format for high-dynamic-range content
Value for Money
Which is the better deal for the price
Pre-filled with launch prices where known — enter today's price for an up-to-date check. Use the same currency for both.
LG OLED evo G5 65
Samsung S95F OLED 65
Physical Comparison
Weigh them up, then compare real dimensions in 3D
LG OLED evo G5 65Samsung S95F OLED 65
LG OLED evo G5 65 is 3.1 kg (16%) heavier than Samsung S95F OLED 65.
Review Videos
Hand-picked expert reviews for each product
Detailed Specifications
The full spec sheet, side by side
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about LG OLED evo G5 65 vs Samsung S95F OLED 65 comparison
LG OLED evo G5 65 and Samsung S95F OLED 65 are compared side by side above across every spec in the tvs category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 85/100 for LG OLED evo G5 65 and 82/100 for Samsung S95F OLED 65.
At launch, Samsung S95F OLED 65 was the more affordable option ($3299) versus LG OLED evo G5 65 ($3399). Weigh that against the overall scores (85/100 vs 82/100) and the value-for-money meter above to judge whether the higher-rated model justifies its price for your needs. Current retail prices vary — check the retailer.
If you want the higher-rated tvs option overall, LG OLED evo G5 65 (85/100) edges out Samsung S95F OLED 65 (82/100). But if Samsung S95F OLED 65 is cheaper or stronger on the specific specs you care about, it can still be the better buy — use the spec table and strengths profile above to decide.