They are closely matched: Samsung QN90F Neo QLED 65 scores 75/100 and Philips OLED809 65 scores 74/100 in our overall comparison — within 1 point. Neither is a clear winner overall, so the decision comes down to the specific features and price that matter most to you.
Samsung QN90F Neo QLED 65 vs Philips OLED809 65
Updated Nov 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score
For most buyers the Samsung QN90F Neo QLED 65 is the better pick — it scores 66/100 to the Philips OLED809 65's 62, leading on Picture Quality and Gaming. Choose the Philips OLED809 65 instead if hdr matters most to you, where it comes out ahead.
Verdict
Our overall take, at a glance
Key takeaways
- Samsung QN90F Neo QLED 65 and Philips OLED809 65 are closely matched overall (within 4 points).
- Samsung QN90F Neo QLED 65 stands out on Gaming HDMI 2.1 Ports: 4 (100% more), Picture Quality Peak Brightness (HDR): 2,086 nits (90% more), Gaming Refresh Rate (VRR Max): 165 Hz (15% more).
- Philips OLED809 65 counters with HDR Formats: Dolby Vision, Audio Output Power: 70 W (17% more).
Samsung QN90F Neo QLED 65 and Philips OLED809 65 are closely matched
Samsung QN90F Neo QLED 65
66
Philips OLED809 65
62
Where Samsung QN90F Neo QLED 65 stands out
- Gaming HDMI 2.1 Ports: 4 (100% more)
- Picture Quality Peak Brightness (HDR): 2,086 nits (90% more)
- Gaming Refresh Rate (VRR Max): 165 Hz (15% more)
Where Philips OLED809 65 stands out
- HDR Formats: Dolby Vision
- Audio Output Power: 70 W (17% more)
Watch-outs
Compromises to know before you buy
Samsung QN90F Neo QLED 65
- No Dolby Vision HDR (HDR10 only) — some titles look flatter.
Philips OLED809 65
No notable compromises found.
In-depth analysisAI
AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Nov 2026.
Samsung QN90F Neo QLED 65
The Samsung QN90F is a 65-inch 4K Neo QLED television designed for users who want a premium viewing experience in versatile home environments. It features Mini-LED backlighting, a 120Hz refresh rate, and advanced panel technologies optimized for fast-paced content like sports and gaming.
Best for Brightly lit living rooms with significant ambient light or windowsBest for Large group gatherings and wide seating arrangementsBest for High-performance gaming with current-generation consoles
Pros
- Excellent anti-glare screen performance that diffuses harsh reflections in brightly lit rooms
- Ultra-wide viewing angles that maintain picture quality for viewers sitting off-center
- Strong gaming support with variable refresh rates and 4K resolution at 120Hz
- Built-in audio system that delivers clear dialogue and noticeable low-frequency impact
Cons
- Positioned as a higher-tier model in the lineup, representing a greater financial investment than the QN70F or QN80F
Philips OLED809 65
The Philips OLED809 65 is a 65-inch 4K OLED television built for movie enthusiasts and gamers seeking immersive visual performance. Powered by the P5 AI picture engine, this smart TV combines high-contrast OLED display tech with dynamic rear Ambilight illumination. It runs on the Google TV interface and supports major audio-visual standards including Dolby Vision and Dolby Atmos.
Best for Dark room cinematic viewing where ambient backlighting reduces eye strain and enBest for Users seeking an integrated smart TV platform with extensive HDR format support
Pros
- Integrated Ambilight LEDs project real-time responsive lighting behind the display
- P5 AI picture engine enhances detail, color fidelity, and contrast processing
- Comprehensive audio-visual support with Dolby Vision and Dolby Atmos
- Google TV operating system provides personalized content discovery and unified app management
Cons
- Ambilight feature requires clear wall space directly behind the television to achieve optimal visual effect
Value for Money
Which is the better deal for the price
Pre-filled with launch prices where known — enter today's price for an up-to-date check. Use the same currency for both.
Samsung QN90F Neo QLED 65
Philips OLED809 65
Physical Comparison
Weigh them up, then compare real dimensions in 3D
Samsung QN90F Neo QLED 65Philips OLED809 65
Samsung QN90F Neo QLED 65 is 1.3 kg (6%) heavier than Philips OLED809 65.
Review Videos
Hand-picked expert reviews for each product
Detailed Specifications
The full spec sheet, side by side
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about Samsung QN90F Neo QLED 65 vs Philips OLED809 65 comparison
Samsung QN90F Neo QLED 65 and Philips OLED809 65 are compared side by side above across every spec in the tvs category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 75/100 for Samsung QN90F Neo QLED 65 and 74/100 for Philips OLED809 65.
It's close — Samsung QN90F Neo QLED 65 (75/100) and Philips OLED809 65 (74/100) score almost the same. Pick based on price and the individual specs that matter most to you; the comparison above shows where each one pulls ahead.
Which would you buy?
Cast your voteOther Popular Comparisons
Explore more product comparisons
Samsung QN90F Neo QLED 65
Samsung QN990F Neo QLED 8K 65
VS
Philips OLED809 65
Philips OLED811 65
VS
Samsung QN90F Neo QLED 65
Samsung S95H OLED 65
VS
Philips OLED809 65
Philips OLED910 65
VS
Samsung QN90F Neo QLED 65
Samsung S95F OLED 65
VS
Philips OLED809 65
Philips OLED810 65
VS
Samsung QN90D 65
Samsung QN90F Neo QLED 65
VS
Samsung QN85D 65
Samsung QN90F Neo QLED 65
VS
Samsung QN90F Neo QLED 65
Samsung S90H OLED 65
VS
Samsung QN90F Neo QLED 65
Samsung S95D OLED 65
VS
Samsung QN80F Neo QLED 65
Samsung QN90F Neo QLED 65
VS
Samsung QN90F Neo QLED 65
Samsung S90F OLED 65
VS