They are closely matched: Philips OLED810 65 scores 75/100 and Samsung QN90F Neo QLED 65 scores 75/100 in our overall comparison — within 1 points. Neither is a clear winner overall, so the decision comes down to the specific features and price that matter most to you.
Philips OLED810 65 vs Samsung QN90F Neo QLED 65
Updated Nov 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score
For most buyers the Samsung QN90F Neo QLED 65 is the better pick — it scores 66/100 to the Philips OLED810 65's 62, leading on Picture Quality and Gaming. Choose the Philips OLED810 65 instead if hdr matters most to you, where it comes out ahead.
Verdict
Our overall take, at a glance
Key takeaways
- Samsung QN90F Neo QLED 65 and Philips OLED810 65 are closely matched overall (within 4 points).
- Samsung QN90F Neo QLED 65 stands out on Gaming HDMI 2.1 Ports: 4 (100% more), Picture Quality Peak Brightness (HDR): 2,086 nits (60% more), Gaming Refresh Rate (VRR Max): 165 Hz (15% more).
- Philips OLED810 65 counters with HDR Formats: Dolby Vision, Audio Output Power: 70 W (17% more).
Samsung QN90F Neo QLED 65 and Philips OLED810 65 are closely matched
Samsung QN90F Neo QLED 65
66
Philips OLED810 65
62
Where Samsung QN90F Neo QLED 65 stands out
- Gaming HDMI 2.1 Ports: 4 (100% more)
- Picture Quality Peak Brightness (HDR): 2,086 nits (60% more)
- Gaming Refresh Rate (VRR Max): 165 Hz (15% more)
Where Philips OLED810 65 stands out
- HDR Formats: Dolby Vision
- Audio Output Power: 70 W (17% more)
Watch-outs
Compromises to know before you buy
Philips OLED810 65
No notable compromises found.
Samsung QN90F Neo QLED 65
- No Dolby Vision HDR (HDR10 only) — some titles look flatter.
In-depth analysisAI
AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Nov 2026.
Philips OLED810 65
The Philips 65OLED810 is a 65-inch 4K OLED television built for media enthusiasts and gamers who prioritize color accuracy and high refresh rates. Driven by the Philips P5 AI Perfect Picture Engine processor, it matches deep black levels with automated ambient light adaptation and support for Dolby Vision, Dolby Atmos, and major HDR formats. Its primary visual hallmark is integrated rear Ambilight LEDs, which project real-time reactive illumination onto the wall surrounding the display.
Best for High-frame-rate console and PC gaming at up to 144 HzBest for Atmospheric movie viewing with dynamic wall-projected bias lighting
Pros
- Supports high-frame-rate gaming with variable refresh rate (VRR) support up to 144 Hz
- Integrated rear-facing Ambilight LED array delivers dynamic bias lighting tied to screen content
- P5 AI image processing continuously balances shadow detail, color balance, and room lighting conditions
Cons
- Initial setup and synchronization with external ARC/eARC Dolby Atmos sound systems can require extra troubleshooting
Samsung QN90F Neo QLED 65
The Samsung QN90F is a 65-inch 4K Neo QLED television designed for users who want a premium viewing experience in versatile home environments. It features Mini-LED backlighting, a 120Hz refresh rate, and advanced panel technologies optimized for fast-paced content like sports and gaming.
Best for Brightly lit living rooms with significant ambient light or windowsBest for Large group gatherings and wide seating arrangementsBest for High-performance gaming with current-generation consoles
Pros
- Excellent anti-glare screen performance that diffuses harsh reflections in brightly lit rooms
- Ultra-wide viewing angles that maintain picture quality for viewers sitting off-center
- Strong gaming support with variable refresh rates and 4K resolution at 120Hz
- Built-in audio system that delivers clear dialogue and noticeable low-frequency impact
Cons
- Positioned as a higher-tier model in the lineup, representing a greater financial investment than the QN70F or QN80F
Value for Money
Which is the better deal for the price
Pre-filled with launch prices where known — enter today's price for an up-to-date check. Use the same currency for both.
Philips OLED810 65
Samsung QN90F Neo QLED 65
Physical Comparison
Weigh them up, then compare real dimensions in 3D
Philips OLED810 65Samsung QN90F Neo QLED 65
Samsung QN90F Neo QLED 65 is 2.1 kg (10%) heavier than Philips OLED810 65.
Review Videos
Hand-picked expert reviews for each product
Detailed Specifications
The full spec sheet, side by side
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about Philips OLED810 65 vs Samsung QN90F Neo QLED 65 comparison
Philips OLED810 65 and Samsung QN90F Neo QLED 65 are compared side by side above across every spec in the tvs category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 75/100 for Philips OLED810 65 and 75/100 for Samsung QN90F Neo QLED 65.
It's close — Philips OLED810 65 (75/100) and Samsung QN90F Neo QLED 65 (75/100) score almost the same. Pick based on price and the individual specs that matter most to you; the comparison above shows where each one pulls ahead.
Which would you buy?
Cast your voteOther Popular Comparisons
Explore more product comparisons
Samsung QN90F Neo QLED 65
Samsung QN990F Neo QLED 8K 65
VS
Philips OLED810 65
Philips OLED811 65
VS
Samsung QN90F Neo QLED 65
Samsung S95H OLED 65
VS
Philips OLED810 65
Philips OLED910 65
VS
Samsung QN90F Neo QLED 65
Samsung S95F OLED 65
VS
Philips OLED809 65
Philips OLED810 65
VS
Samsung QN90D 65
Samsung QN90F Neo QLED 65
VS
Samsung QN85D 65
Samsung QN90F Neo QLED 65
VS
Samsung QN90F Neo QLED 65
Samsung S90H OLED 65
VS
Samsung QN90F Neo QLED 65
Samsung S95D OLED 65
VS
Samsung QN80F Neo QLED 65
Samsung QN90F Neo QLED 65
VS
Samsung QN90F Neo QLED 65
Samsung S90F OLED 65
VS