AMD EPYC 72F3 vs Apple M2 Max

Updated Nov 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score

For most buyers the AMD EPYC 72F3 is the better pick — it scores 66/100 to the Apple M2 Max's 56, leading on Core Specifications. Choose the Apple M2 Max instead if integrated graphics matters most to you, where it comes out ahead.

Verdict

Our overall take, at a glance

AMD EPYC 72F3 leads overall

AMD EPYC 72F3

Apple M2 Max

Why it stands out

Core Specifications Threads: 16

Winner by category for AMD EPYC 72F3 vs Apple M2 Max
Category	AMD EPYC 72F3	Apple M2 Max	Winner
Core Specifications	83	56	AMD EPYC 72F3
Integrated Graphics	0	57	Apple M2 Max
Benchmark	57	56	Tie

In-depth analysisAI

AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Nov 2026.

AMD EPYC 72F3

The AMD EPYC 72F3 is an enterprise server processor featuring 8 cores and 16 threads designed for high-frequency, cache-sensitive server workloads. Built on a 7nm manufacturing process, it delivers a high base clock speed of 3.7 GHz and a boost up to 4.1 GHz, paired with an unusually large 512 MB L3 cache. It is primarily built for environments where per-core software licensing fees make high individual core performance more critical than total core density.

Best for Database systems and applications constrained by per-core licensing feesBest for High-frequency server workloads that benefit heavily from massive L3 cache capac

Pros

Massive 512 MB L3 cache providing high data throughput for cache-sensitive tasks
High base clock speed of 3.7 GHz for strong single-threaded and per-core performance

Cons

High baseline power consumption of 165 W (up to 200 W) for an 8-core processor
Lower overall parallel compute throughput compared to high-core-count server CPUs

Apple M2 Max

The Apple M2 Max is a high-performance system-on-a-chip designed by Apple Inc., intended for professional computing tasks. Due to its advanced specifications, it powers applications requiring intensive computational resources, such as video editing and 3D rendering. It is best suited for creative professionals and developers who demand top-tier performance in portable forms.

Best for Video ProductionBest for 3D RenderingBest for Software Development

Pros

Offers substantial processing power through a combined CPU/GPU design.
The integrated graphics capability (up to 76 cores) provides extensive visual compute resources.
Features advanced memory support, capable of high data transfer rates (LPDDR5 up to 192 GB).

Cons

While powerful, the chip is designed for professional workloads rather than routine general computing.
Its high specification level may result in a premium cost point.

Source

Video — reviews used (2)

Generated Jun 28, 2026

Value for Money

Which is the better deal for the price

Enter today's price for each product to see which offers better value. Use the same currency for both.

AMD EPYC 72F3

Check Price on Amazon

Apple M2 Max

Check Price on Amazon

Performance

Higher benchmark score = faster

AMD EPYC 72F327,252

Apple M2 Max26,839

See the raw benchmark values →

Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.

Review Videos

Hand-picked expert reviews for each product

Detailed Specifications

The full spec sheet, side by side

Core Specifications

Feature	AMD EPYC 72F3	Apple M2 Max
Cores	8	12
Threads	16	12
Base Frequency	3.7 GHz	N/A
Base Power Consumption	180 W	N/A
Maximum Frequency	4.1 GHz	N/A
Maximum Power Consumption	200 W	N/A
L1 Cache	N/A	N/A
L2 Cache	N/A	N/A
L3 Cache	256 MB	N/A
Lithography Process	7 nm	5 nm29% less
Is unlocked	N/A	No

Integrated Graphics

Feature	AMD EPYC 72F3	Apple M2 Max
Model	N/A

Benchmark

Feature	AMD EPYC 72F3	Apple M2 Max
PassMark CPU Mark	27,252	26,839

Specification Note

Specifications are compiled from official manufacturer data and other reliable internet sources. Some features may vary by region or model configuration.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about AMD EPYC 72F3 vs Apple M2 Max comparison

They are closely matched: AMD EPYC 72F3 scores 61/100 and Apple M2 Max scores 60/100 in our overall comparison — within 1 point. Neither is a clear winner overall, so the decision comes down to the specific features and price that matter most to you.

AMD EPYC 72F3 and Apple M2 Max are compared side by side above across every spec in the cpus category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 61/100 for AMD EPYC 72F3 and 60/100 for Apple M2 Max.

It's close — AMD EPYC 72F3 (61/100) and Apple M2 Max (60/100) score almost the same. Pick based on price and the individual specs that matter most to you; the comparison above shows where each one pulls ahead.