AMD EPYC 7343 vs Intel Core i9 13980HX

Updated Nov 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score

The Intel Core i9 13980HX and AMD EPYC 7343 are closely matched at 66 and 64/100. The Intel Core i9 13980HX edges ahead on Core Specifications and Integrated Graphics, while the AMD EPYC 7343 leads on value — pick the one whose strengths match what you'll actually use.

Verdict

Our overall take, at a glance

Key takeaways

  • Intel Core i9 13980HX and AMD EPYC 7343 are closely matched overall (within 2 points).
  • Intel Core i9 13980HX stands out on Core Specifications L2 Cache: 32 MB (300% more), Core Specifications Cores: 24, Core Specifications Maximum Frequency: 5.6 GHz (44% more).
  • AMD EPYC 7343 counters with Core Specifications Base Power Consumption: 190 W (245% more), Core Specifications L3 Cache: 128 MB (256% more), Core Specifications Base Frequency: 3.2 GHz (45% more).
Intel Core i9 13980HX and AMD EPYC 7343 are closely matched
Intel Core i9 13980HX
66
AMD EPYC 7343
64
Where Intel Core i9 13980HX stands out
  • Core Specifications L2 Cache: 32 MB (300% more)
  • Core Specifications Cores: 24
  • Core Specifications Maximum Frequency: 5.6 GHz (44% more)
Where AMD EPYC 7343 stands out
  • Core Specifications Base Power Consumption: 190 W (245% more)
  • Core Specifications L3 Cache: 128 MB (256% more)
  • Core Specifications Base Frequency: 3.2 GHz (45% more)

In-depth analysisAI

AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Nov 2026.

AMD EPYC 7343

The AMD EPYC 7343 is a 16-core, 32-thread server processor designed for data centers and enterprise server deployments. Built on a 7nm lithography process, it features a base frequency of 3.2 GHz with a boost clock of up to 3.9 GHz and includes 128 MB of L3 cache. It targets mid-density server workloads that benefit from high per-core clock speeds combined with robust multi-threading.

Best for Enterprise virtualization servers requiring high core clock speedsBest for Data center workloads that depend heavily on large pool memory caches
Pros
  • High 3.2 GHz base clock speed for clock-sensitive server applications
  • Generous 128 MB L3 cache to assist memory-bound server workloads
  • Solid multi-threaded execution with 16 cores and 32 threads
Cons
  • High baseline power consumption of 165 W reaching up to 200 W under max load
  • Lacks integrated graphics processing

Intel Core i9 13980HX

The product name is listed as an Intel processor type in technical hardware lists. It belongs to the 13th generation of Intel Core processors, according to video sources.

Pros
  • It utilizes the architecture associated with the 13th Gen Intel Core processors.

Value for Money

Which is the better deal for the price

Enter today's price for each product to see which offers better value. Use the same currency for both.

Intel Core i9 13980HX

Performance

Higher benchmark score = faster

AMD EPYC 734343,778
Intel Core i9 13980HX45,231

Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.

Detailed Specifications

The full spec sheet, side by side

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about AMD EPYC 7343 vs Intel Core i9 13980HX comparison

They are closely matched: AMD EPYC 7343 scores 75/100 and Intel Core i9 13980HX scores 75/100 in our overall comparison — within 1 points. Neither is a clear winner overall, so the decision comes down to the specific features and price that matter most to you.
AMD EPYC 7343 and Intel Core i9 13980HX are compared side by side above across every spec in the cpus category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 75/100 for AMD EPYC 7343 and 75/100 for Intel Core i9 13980HX.
It's close — AMD EPYC 7343 (75/100) and Intel Core i9 13980HX (75/100) score almost the same. Pick based on price and the individual specs that matter most to you; the comparison above shows where each one pulls ahead.

Which would you buy?

Cast your vote