AMD EPYC 7343 vs Intel Xeon Gold 6312U

Updated Nov 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score

For most buyers the AMD EPYC 7343 is the better pick — it scores 70/100 to the Intel Xeon Gold 6312U's 61, leading on Core Specifications and Benchmark. Choose the Intel Xeon Gold 6312U instead if you want to spend less.

Verdict

Our overall take, at a glance

AMD EPYC 7343 leads overall

AMD EPYC 7343

Intel Xeon Gold 6312U

Why it stands out

Core Specifications L3 Cache: 128 MB (256% more)
Core Specifications Base Frequency: 3.2 GHz (33% more)
Core Specifications Lithography Process: 7 nm (30% less)

Winner by category for AMD EPYC 7343 vs Intel Xeon Gold 6312U
Category	AMD EPYC 7343	Intel Xeon Gold 6312U	Winner
Core Specifications	64	42	AMD EPYC 7343
Integrated Graphics	0	0	Tie
Benchmark	73	70	AMD EPYC 7343

In-depth analysisAI

AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Nov 2026.

AMD EPYC 7343

The AMD EPYC 7343 is a 16-core, 32-thread server processor designed for data centers and enterprise server deployments. Built on a 7nm lithography process, it features a base frequency of 3.2 GHz with a boost clock of up to 3.9 GHz and includes 128 MB of L3 cache. It targets mid-density server workloads that benefit from high per-core clock speeds combined with robust multi-threading.

Best for Enterprise virtualization servers requiring high core clock speedsBest for Data center workloads that depend heavily on large pool memory caches

Pros

High 3.2 GHz base clock speed for clock-sensitive server applications
Generous 128 MB L3 cache to assist memory-bound server workloads
Solid multi-threaded execution with 16 cores and 32 threads

Cons

High baseline power consumption of 165 W reaching up to 200 W under max load
Lacks integrated graphics processing

Intel Xeon Gold 6312U

The Intel Xeon Gold series is a processor line designed for scalable performance in computing systems. These CPUs are characterized by their features suited for server-grade applications. The provided data includes specifications, including core counts and TDP, but does not specify the target user or intended use case.

Best for Server applicationsBest for High-performance computing

Pros

Features high clock speeds; for example, one model listed has a Turbo Boost up to 3.6 GHz
Supports DDR4 memory in general (e.g., 8× DDR4-3200)
Various models are listed with different core counts and thread configurations.

Cons

The official data provided only lists the product type, not detailed specs for the specific Xeon Gold 6312U model.
No source explicitly details the features or specifications of the 'Xeon Gold 6312U' model in the available table.

Value for Money

Which is the better deal for the price

Enter today's price for each product to see which offers better value. Use the same currency for both.

AMD EPYC 7343

Check Price on Amazon

Intel Xeon Gold 6312U

Check Price on Amazon

Performance

Higher benchmark score = faster

AMD EPYC 734343,778

Intel Xeon Gold 6312U41,858

See the raw benchmark values →

Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.

Detailed Specifications

The full spec sheet, side by side

Core Specifications

Feature	AMD EPYC 7343	Intel Xeon Gold 6312U
Cores	16	24
Threads	32	48
Base Frequency	3.2 GHz33% more	2.4 GHz
Base Power Consumption	190 W3% more	185 W
Maximum Frequency	3.9 GHz8% more	3.6 GHz
Maximum Power Consumption	200 W	N/A
L1 Cache	2,048 KB7% more	1,920 KB
L2 Cache	8 MB	30 MB275% more
L3 Cache	128 MB256% more	36 MB
Lithography Process	7 nm30% less	10 nm
Is unlocked	N/A	No

Integrated Graphics

Feature	AMD EPYC 7343	Intel Xeon Gold 6312U
Model	N/A	N/A

Benchmark

Feature	AMD EPYC 7343	Intel Xeon Gold 6312U
PassMark CPU Mark	43,7785% more	41,858

Specification Note

Specifications are compiled from official manufacturer data and other reliable internet sources. Some features may vary by region or model configuration.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about AMD EPYC 7343 vs Intel Xeon Gold 6312U comparison

They are closely matched: AMD EPYC 7343 scores 75/100 and Intel Xeon Gold 6312U scores 74/100 in our overall comparison — within 1 point. Neither is a clear winner overall, so the decision comes down to the specific features and price that matter most to you.

AMD EPYC 7343 and Intel Xeon Gold 6312U are compared side by side above across every spec in the cpus category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 75/100 for AMD EPYC 7343 and 74/100 for Intel Xeon Gold 6312U.

It's close — AMD EPYC 7343 (75/100) and Intel Xeon Gold 6312U (74/100) score almost the same. Pick based on price and the individual specs that matter most to you; the comparison above shows where each one pulls ahead.