AMD EPYC 7343 vs Intel Xeon Gold 6330

Updated Nov 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score

For most buyers the AMD EPYC 7343 is the better pick — it scores 70/100 to the Intel Xeon Gold 6330's 61, leading on Core Specifications and Benchmark. Choose the Intel Xeon Gold 6330 instead if you want to spend less.

Verdict

Our overall take, at a glance

AMD EPYC 7343 leads overall

AMD EPYC 7343

Intel Xeon Gold 6330

Why it stands out

Core Specifications L3 Cache: 128 MB (205% more)
Core Specifications Base Frequency: 3.2 GHz (60% more)
Core Specifications Lithography Process: 7 nm (30% less)

Winner by category for AMD EPYC 7343 vs Intel Xeon Gold 6330
Category	AMD EPYC 7343	Intel Xeon Gold 6330	Winner
Core Specifications	64	43	AMD EPYC 7343
Integrated Graphics	0	0	Tie
Benchmark	73	70	AMD EPYC 7343

In-depth analysisAI

AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Nov 2026.

AMD EPYC 7343

The AMD EPYC 7343 is a 16-core, 32-thread server processor designed for data centers and enterprise server deployments. Built on a 7nm lithography process, it features a base frequency of 3.2 GHz with a boost clock of up to 3.9 GHz and includes 128 MB of L3 cache. It targets mid-density server workloads that benefit from high per-core clock speeds combined with robust multi-threading.

Best for Enterprise virtualization servers requiring high core clock speedsBest for Data center workloads that depend heavily on large pool memory caches

Pros

High 3.2 GHz base clock speed for clock-sensitive server applications
Generous 128 MB L3 cache to assist memory-bound server workloads
Solid multi-threaded execution with 16 cores and 32 threads

Cons

High baseline power consumption of 165 W reaching up to 200 W under max load
Lacks integrated graphics processing

Intel Xeon Gold 6330

Intel Xeon Gold processors are a line of microprocessors designed for enterprise applications. They represent specific generations within the broader Intel Xeon product family and generally target data center or high-performance computing use cases.

Pros

The series includes models from various architectures, such as Skylake and Sapphire Rapids.

Cons

The provided source only lists the existence of 'Xeon Gold' in several generations but does not provide technical specifications for a specific model like the 6330.

Value for Money

Which is the better deal for the price

Enter today's price for each product to see which offers better value. Use the same currency for both.

AMD EPYC 7343

Check Price on Amazon

Intel Xeon Gold 6330

Check Price on Amazon

Performance

Higher benchmark score = faster

AMD EPYC 734343,778

Intel Xeon Gold 633042,072

See the raw benchmark values →

Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.

Detailed Specifications

The full spec sheet, side by side

Core Specifications

Feature	AMD EPYC 7343	Intel Xeon Gold 6330
Cores	16	28
Threads	32	56
Base Frequency	3.2 GHz60% more	2 GHz
Base Power Consumption	190 W	205 W8% more
Maximum Frequency	3.9 GHz26% more	3.1 GHz
Maximum Power Consumption	200 W	N/A
L1 Cache	2,048 KB	2,240 KB9% more
L2 Cache	8 MB	35 MB338% more
L3 Cache	128 MB205% more	42 MB
Lithography Process	7 nm30% less	10 nm
Is unlocked	N/A	No

Integrated Graphics

Feature	AMD EPYC 7343	Intel Xeon Gold 6330
Model	N/A	N/A

Benchmark

Feature	AMD EPYC 7343	Intel Xeon Gold 6330
PassMark CPU Mark	43,7784% more	42,072

Specification Note

Specifications are compiled from official manufacturer data and other reliable internet sources. Some features may vary by region or model configuration.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about AMD EPYC 7343 vs Intel Xeon Gold 6330 comparison

They are closely matched: AMD EPYC 7343 scores 75/100 and Intel Xeon Gold 6330 scores 75/100 in our overall comparison — within 1 points. Neither is a clear winner overall, so the decision comes down to the specific features and price that matter most to you.

AMD EPYC 7343 and Intel Xeon Gold 6330 are compared side by side above across every spec in the cpus category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 75/100 for AMD EPYC 7343 and 75/100 for Intel Xeon Gold 6330.

It's close — AMD EPYC 7343 (75/100) and Intel Xeon Gold 6330 (75/100) score almost the same. Pick based on price and the individual specs that matter most to you; the comparison above shows where each one pulls ahead.