Intel Xeon Gold 6342 vs AMD EPYC 7343

Updated Nov 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score

For most buyers the AMD EPYC 7343 is the better pick — it scores 70/100 to the Intel Xeon Gold 6342's 64, leading on Core Specifications. Choose the Intel Xeon Gold 6342 instead if benchmark matters most to you, where it comes out ahead.

Verdict

Our overall take, at a glance

AMD EPYC 7343 leads overall

AMD EPYC 7343

Intel Xeon Gold 6342

Why it stands out

Core Specifications L3 Cache: 128 MB (256% more)
Core Specifications Lithography Process: 7 nm (30% less)
Core Specifications Base Frequency: 3.2 GHz (14% more)

Winner by category for Intel Xeon Gold 6342 vs AMD EPYC 7343
Category	AMD EPYC 7343	Intel Xeon Gold 6342	Winner
Core Specifications	69	41	AMD EPYC 7343
Integrated Graphics	0	0	Tie
Benchmark	71	76	Intel Xeon Gold 6342

In-depth analysisAI

AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Nov 2026.

Intel Xeon Gold 6342

This document chapter lists Intel Xeon processors by generation and architecture. It serves as a navigational index rather than providing detailed product specifications for specific models.

Best for ResearchBest for Comparison lookup

Pros

Categorizes CPUs into generations (P6, NetBurst, Core, etc.)
Allows browsing of processors by dedicated series (e.g., Platinum, Gold)
Identifies major processor architectures like Kaby Lake and Skylake

Cons

Does not provide technical details for specific CPU models.
Content is primarily a list or index structure.

AMD EPYC 7343

The AMD EPYC 7343 is a 16-core, 32-thread server processor designed for data centers and enterprise server deployments. Built on a 7nm lithography process, it features a base frequency of 3.2 GHz with a boost clock of up to 3.9 GHz and includes 128 MB of L3 cache. It targets mid-density server workloads that benefit from high per-core clock speeds combined with robust multi-threading.

Best for Enterprise virtualization servers requiring high core clock speedsBest for Data center workloads that depend heavily on large pool memory caches

Pros

High 3.2 GHz base clock speed for clock-sensitive server applications
Generous 128 MB L3 cache to assist memory-bound server workloads
Solid multi-threaded execution with 16 cores and 32 threads

Cons

High baseline power consumption of 165 W reaching up to 200 W under max load
Lacks integrated graphics processing

Value for Money

Which is the better deal for the price

Enter today's price for each product to see which offers better value. Use the same currency for both.

Intel Xeon Gold 6342

Check Price on Amazon

AMD EPYC 7343

Check Price on Amazon

Performance

Higher benchmark score = faster

Intel Xeon Gold 634247,076

AMD EPYC 734343,778

See the raw benchmark values →

Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.

Detailed Specifications

The full spec sheet, side by side

Core Specifications

Feature	Intel Xeon Gold 6342	AMD EPYC 7343
Cores	24	16
Threads	48	32
Base Frequency	2.8 GHz	3.2 GHz14% more
Base Power Consumption	230 W21% more	190 W
Maximum Frequency	3.5 GHz	3.9 GHz11% more
Maximum Power Consumption	N/A	200 W
L1 Cache	N/A	2,048 KB
L2 Cache	30 MB275% more	8 MB
L3 Cache	36 MB	128 MB256% more
Lithography Process	10 nm	7 nm30% less
Is unlocked	No	N/A

Integrated Graphics

Feature	Intel Xeon Gold 6342	AMD EPYC 7343
Model	N/A	N/A

Benchmark

Feature	Intel Xeon Gold 6342	AMD EPYC 7343
PassMark CPU Mark	47,0768% more	43,778

Specification Note

Specifications are compiled from official manufacturer data and other reliable internet sources. Some features may vary by region or model configuration.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Intel Xeon Gold 6342 vs AMD EPYC 7343 comparison

They are closely matched: Intel Xeon Gold 6342 scores 76/100 and AMD EPYC 7343 scores 75/100 in our overall comparison — within 1 point. Neither is a clear winner overall, so the decision comes down to the specific features and price that matter most to you.

Intel Xeon Gold 6342 and AMD EPYC 7343 are compared side by side above across every spec in the cpus category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 76/100 for Intel Xeon Gold 6342 and 75/100 for AMD EPYC 7343.

It's close — Intel Xeon Gold 6342 (76/100) and AMD EPYC 7343 (75/100) score almost the same. Pick based on price and the individual specs that matter most to you; the comparison above shows where each one pulls ahead.