AMD EPYC 7453 vs AMD EPYC 73F3

Updated Nov 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score

For most buyers the AMD EPYC 73F3 is the better pick — it scores 73/100 to the AMD EPYC 7453's 64, leading on Core Specifications. Choose the AMD EPYC 7453 instead if benchmark matters most to you, where it comes out ahead.

Verdict

Our overall take, at a glance

AMD EPYC 73F3 leads overall

AMD EPYC 73F3

AMD EPYC 7453

Why it stands out

Core Specifications L3 Cache: 256 MB (300% more)
Core Specifications Base Frequency: 3.5 GHz (25% more)
Core Specifications Maximum Frequency: 4 GHz (14% more)

Winner by category for AMD EPYC 7453 vs AMD EPYC 73F3
Category	AMD EPYC 73F3	AMD EPYC 7453	Winner
Core Specifications	71	38	AMD EPYC 73F3
Integrated Graphics	0	0	Tie
Benchmark	73	76	AMD EPYC 7453

In-depth analysisAI

AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Nov 2026.

AMD EPYC 7453

The AMD EPYC 7453 is an enterprise server processor built on a 7nm lithography process, designed for high-density compute environments. Featuring 28 cores and 56 threads operating at a 2.8 GHz base frequency, it targets data centers and multi-tenant virtualization platforms. It incorporates 128 MB of L3 cache to maintain throughput across demanding multi-threaded enterprise applications.

Best for Enterprise server virtualization requiring high parallel core capacityBest for Data center environments executing concurrent multi-threaded applications

Pros

High thread count with 28 cores and 56 threads for heavy parallel workloads
Large 128 MB L3 cache helps reduce memory latency in data-intensive tasks
Boost clock reaches up to 3.5 GHz for handling bursty compute needs

Cons

Substantial power consumption with a maximum TDP of 240W
Lacks integrated graphics capabilities
Locked multiplier prevents any custom frequency adjustments

AMD EPYC 73F3

The AMD EPYC 73F3 is a high-frequency server processor released in 2021, built on a 7nm manufacturing process with 16 cores and 32 threads. It operates at a fast base clock frequency of 3.5 GHz with a maximum boost frequency of 4.0 GHz, supported by a large 256 MB L3 cache. Intended for enterprise data center environments, it operates at a base power level of 225W with a maximum power draw of 240W.

Best for Enterprise server applications needing high per-core performance and low cache lBest for Data center deployments requiring high-frequency 16-core processing power

Pros

High 3.5 GHz base clock speed and up to 4.0 GHz boost for strong per-thread performance
Large 256 MB L3 cache reduces memory access latency for cached-sensitive tasks
16 cores and 32 threads provide solid multi-threaded enterprise computing capabilities

Cons

High 225W to 240W power consumption requires substantial server cooling infrastructure
Lacks integrated graphics capability
Locked multiplier prevents manual frequency adjustments

Value for Money

Which is the better deal for the price

Enter today's price for each product to see which offers better value. Use the same currency for both.

AMD EPYC 7453

Check Price on Amazon

AMD EPYC 73F3

Check Price on Amazon

Performance

Higher benchmark score = faster

AMD EPYC 745348,453

AMD EPYC 73F346,103

See the raw benchmark values →

Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.

Detailed Specifications

The full spec sheet, side by side

Core Specifications

Feature	AMD EPYC 7453	AMD EPYC 73F3
Cores	28	16
Threads	56	32
Base Frequency	2.8 GHz	3.5 GHz25% more
Base Power Consumption	225 W	240 W7% more
Maximum Frequency	3.5 GHz	4 GHz14% more
Maximum Power Consumption	240 W	240 W
L1 Cache	N/A	1,024 KB
L2 Cache	N/A	8 MB
L3 Cache	64 MB	256 MB300% more
Lithography Process	7 nm	7 nm
Is unlocked	N/A	N/A

Integrated Graphics

Feature	AMD EPYC 7453	AMD EPYC 73F3
Model	N/A	N/A

Benchmark

Feature	AMD EPYC 7453	AMD EPYC 73F3
PassMark CPU Mark	48,4535% more	46,103

Specification Note

Specifications are compiled from official manufacturer data and other reliable internet sources. Some features may vary by region or model configuration.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about AMD EPYC 7453 vs AMD EPYC 73F3 comparison

They are closely matched: AMD EPYC 7453 scores 77/100 and AMD EPYC 73F3 scores 76/100 in our overall comparison — within 1 point. Neither is a clear winner overall, so the decision comes down to the specific features and price that matter most to you.

AMD EPYC 7453 and AMD EPYC 73F3 are compared side by side above across every spec in the cpus category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 77/100 for AMD EPYC 7453 and 76/100 for AMD EPYC 73F3.

It's close — AMD EPYC 7453 (77/100) and AMD EPYC 73F3 (76/100) score almost the same. Pick based on price and the individual specs that matter most to you; the comparison above shows where each one pulls ahead.