AMD EPYC 9354P vs AMD EPYC 73F3

Updated Nov 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score

For most buyers the AMD EPYC 9354P is the better pick — it scores 80/100 to the AMD EPYC 73F3's 59, leading on Core Specifications and Benchmark. Choose the AMD EPYC 73F3 instead if you want to spend less.

Verdict

Our overall take, at a glance

AMD EPYC 9354P leads overall

AMD EPYC 9354P

AMD EPYC 73F3

Why it stands out

Core Specifications L1 Cache: 2,048 KB (100% more)
Core Specifications L2 Cache: 32 MB (300% more)
Benchmark PassMark CPU Mark: 74,813 (62% more)

Winner by category for AMD EPYC 9354P vs AMD EPYC 73F3
Category	AMD EPYC 9354P	AMD EPYC 73F3	Winner
Core Specifications	59	41	AMD EPYC 9354P
Integrated Graphics	0	0	Tie
Benchmark	91	68	AMD EPYC 9354P

In-depth analysisAI

AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Nov 2026.

AMD EPYC 9354P

The AMD EPYC 9354P is a server processor featuring 32 cores and 64 threads built on a 5nm manufacturing process. It operates at a base clock speed of 3.3 GHz with a maximum boost frequency of 3.8 GHz. Designed primarily for single-socket server deployments, this chip targets data center and enterprise environments requiring high multi-threaded performance and substantial memory caching capabilities.

Best for Single-socket server builds requiring heavy multi-threaded processing powerBest for Enterprise database and virtualization hosts reliant on large L3 cache

Pros

High compute density with 32 cores and 64 threads
Generous 256 MB L3 cache pool to benefit data-intensive workloads
Built on an efficient 5nm lithography process

Cons

High thermal power demand, reaching up to 300W under max load
Lacks integrated graphics capability

AMD EPYC 73F3

The AMD EPYC 73F3 is a high-frequency server processor released in 2021, built on a 7nm manufacturing process with 16 cores and 32 threads. It operates at a fast base clock frequency of 3.5 GHz with a maximum boost frequency of 4.0 GHz, supported by a large 256 MB L3 cache. Intended for enterprise data center environments, it operates at a base power level of 225W with a maximum power draw of 240W.

Best for Enterprise server applications needing high per-core performance and low cache lBest for Data center deployments requiring high-frequency 16-core processing power

Pros

High 3.5 GHz base clock speed and up to 4.0 GHz boost for strong per-thread performance
Large 256 MB L3 cache reduces memory access latency for cached-sensitive tasks
16 cores and 32 threads provide solid multi-threaded enterprise computing capabilities

Cons

High 225W to 240W power consumption requires substantial server cooling infrastructure
Lacks integrated graphics capability
Locked multiplier prevents manual frequency adjustments

Value for Money

Which is the better deal for the price

Enter today's price for each product to see which offers better value. Use the same currency for both.

AMD EPYC 9354P

Check Price on Amazon

AMD EPYC 73F3

Check Price on Amazon

Performance

Higher benchmark score = faster

AMD EPYC 9354P74,813

AMD EPYC 73F346,103

See the raw benchmark values →

Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.

Detailed Specifications

The full spec sheet, side by side

Core Specifications

Feature	AMD EPYC 9354P	AMD EPYC 73F3
Cores	32	16
Threads	64	32
Base Frequency	3.3 GHz	3.5 GHz6% more
Base Power Consumption	280 W17% more	240 W
Maximum Frequency	3.8 GHz	4 GHz5% more
Maximum Power Consumption	300 W25% more	240 W
L1 Cache	2,048 KB100% more	1,024 KB
L2 Cache	32 MB300% more	8 MB
L3 Cache	256 MB	256 MB
Lithography Process	5 nm29% less	7 nm
Is unlocked	N/A	N/A

Integrated Graphics

Feature	AMD EPYC 9354P	AMD EPYC 73F3
Model	N/A	N/A

Benchmark

Feature	AMD EPYC 9354P	AMD EPYC 73F3
PassMark CPU Mark	74,81362% more	46,103

Specification Note

Specifications are compiled from official manufacturer data and other reliable internet sources. Some features may vary by region or model configuration.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about AMD EPYC 9354P vs AMD EPYC 73F3 comparison

Based on our overall comparison score, AMD EPYC 9354P rates higher at 89/100 versus 76/100 for AMD EPYC 73F3 — a 13-point lead. AMD EPYC 9354P is the stronger overall pick, though the right choice still depends on which specs matter most to you; the full spec table above breaks down every difference.

AMD EPYC 9354P and AMD EPYC 73F3 are compared side by side above across every spec in the cpus category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 89/100 for AMD EPYC 9354P and 76/100 for AMD EPYC 73F3.

If you want the higher-rated cpus option overall, AMD EPYC 9354P (89/100) edges out AMD EPYC 73F3 (76/100). But if AMD EPYC 73F3 is cheaper or stronger on the specific specs you care about, it can still be the better buy — use the spec table and strengths profile above to decide.