AMD EPYC 73F3 vs Intel Xeon Gold 6342

Updated Nov 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score

For most buyers the AMD EPYC 73F3 is the better pick — it scores 72/100 to the Intel Xeon Gold 6342's 64, leading on Core Specifications. Choose the Intel Xeon Gold 6342 instead if you want to spend less.

Verdict

Our overall take, at a glance

AMD EPYC 73F3 leads overall

AMD EPYC 73F3

Intel Xeon Gold 6342

Why it stands out

Core Specifications L3 Cache: 256 MB (611% more)
Core Specifications Lithography Process: 7 nm (30% less)
Core Specifications Base Frequency: 3.5 GHz (25% more)

Winner by category for AMD EPYC 73F3 vs Intel Xeon Gold 6342
Category	AMD EPYC 73F3	Intel Xeon Gold 6342	Winner
Core Specifications	68	42	AMD EPYC 73F3
Integrated Graphics	0	0	Tie
Benchmark	74	75	Tie

In-depth analysisAI

AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Nov 2026.

AMD EPYC 73F3

The AMD EPYC 73F3 is a high-frequency server processor released in 2021, built on a 7nm manufacturing process with 16 cores and 32 threads. It operates at a fast base clock frequency of 3.5 GHz with a maximum boost frequency of 4.0 GHz, supported by a large 256 MB L3 cache. Intended for enterprise data center environments, it operates at a base power level of 225W with a maximum power draw of 240W.

Best for Enterprise server applications needing high per-core performance and low cache lBest for Data center deployments requiring high-frequency 16-core processing power

Pros

High 3.5 GHz base clock speed and up to 4.0 GHz boost for strong per-thread performance
Large 256 MB L3 cache reduces memory access latency for cached-sensitive tasks
16 cores and 32 threads provide solid multi-threaded enterprise computing capabilities

Cons

High 225W to 240W power consumption requires substantial server cooling infrastructure
Lacks integrated graphics capability
Locked multiplier prevents manual frequency adjustments

Intel Xeon Gold 6342

This document chapter lists Intel Xeon processors by generation and architecture. It serves as a navigational index rather than providing detailed product specifications for specific models.

Best for ResearchBest for Comparison lookup

Pros

Categorizes CPUs into generations (P6, NetBurst, Core, etc.)
Allows browsing of processors by dedicated series (e.g., Platinum, Gold)
Identifies major processor architectures like Kaby Lake and Skylake

Cons

Does not provide technical details for specific CPU models.
Content is primarily a list or index structure.

Value for Money

Which is the better deal for the price

Enter today's price for each product to see which offers better value. Use the same currency for both.

AMD EPYC 73F3

Check Price on Amazon

Intel Xeon Gold 6342

Check Price on Amazon

Performance

Higher benchmark score = faster

AMD EPYC 73F346,103

Intel Xeon Gold 634247,076

See the raw benchmark values →

Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.

Detailed Specifications

The full spec sheet, side by side

Core Specifications

Feature	AMD EPYC 73F3	Intel Xeon Gold 6342
Cores	16	24
Threads	32	48
Base Frequency	3.5 GHz25% more	2.8 GHz
Base Power Consumption	240 W4% more	230 W
Maximum Frequency	4 GHz14% more	3.5 GHz
Maximum Power Consumption	240 W	N/A
L1 Cache	1,024 KB	N/A
L2 Cache	8 MB	30 MB275% more
L3 Cache	256 MB611% more	36 MB
Lithography Process	7 nm30% less	10 nm
Is unlocked	N/A	No

Integrated Graphics

Feature	AMD EPYC 73F3	Intel Xeon Gold 6342
Model	N/A	N/A

Benchmark

Feature	AMD EPYC 73F3	Intel Xeon Gold 6342
PassMark CPU Mark	46,103	47,076

Specification Note

Specifications are compiled from official manufacturer data and other reliable internet sources. Some features may vary by region or model configuration.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about AMD EPYC 73F3 vs Intel Xeon Gold 6342 comparison

They are closely matched: AMD EPYC 73F3 scores 76/100 and Intel Xeon Gold 6342 scores 76/100 in our overall comparison — within 1 points. Neither is a clear winner overall, so the decision comes down to the specific features and price that matter most to you.

AMD EPYC 73F3 and Intel Xeon Gold 6342 are compared side by side above across every spec in the cpus category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 76/100 for AMD EPYC 73F3 and 76/100 for Intel Xeon Gold 6342.

It's close — AMD EPYC 73F3 (76/100) and Intel Xeon Gold 6342 (76/100) score almost the same. Pick based on price and the individual specs that matter most to you; the comparison above shows where each one pulls ahead.