Intel Xeon W 3345 vs AMD EPYC 73F3

Updated Nov 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score

For most buyers the AMD EPYC 73F3 is the better pick — it scores 70/100 to the Intel Xeon W 3345's 66, leading on Core Specifications. Choose the Intel Xeon W 3345 instead if benchmark matters most to you, where it comes out ahead.

Verdict

Our overall take, at a glance

AMD EPYC 73F3 and Intel Xeon W 3345 are closely matched

AMD EPYC 73F3

Intel Xeon W 3345

Where AMD EPYC 73F3 stands out

Core Specifications L3 Cache: 256 MB (611% more)
Core Specifications Lithography Process: 7 nm (30% less)
Core Specifications Base Frequency: 3.5 GHz (17% more)

Where Intel Xeon W 3345 stands out

Core Specifications L2 Cache: 30 MB (275% more)
Core Specifications L1 Cache: 1,920 KB (88% more)
Core Specifications Cores: 24

Winner by category for Intel Xeon W 3345 vs AMD EPYC 73F3
Category	AMD EPYC 73F3	Intel Xeon W 3345	Winner
Core Specifications	62	45	AMD EPYC 73F3
Integrated Graphics	0	0	Tie
Benchmark	73	76	Intel Xeon W 3345

In-depth analysisAI

AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Nov 2026.

Intel Xeon W 3345

The provided source is a comprehensive list of Intel Xeon microprocessors cataloged by generation. It indexes numerous models, including those from the W series, indicating its use for research on processor history and lineups.

Best for researchBest for product comparison history

Pros

Lists various generations of Intel Xeon processors
Includes entries for multiple W-series models (e.g., Xeon W 10, Xeon W 14)

Cons

Does not provide specific technical details or specifications for the target product (Intel Xeon W 3345)
The content is purely a list of processor series and general generations.

AMD EPYC 73F3

The AMD EPYC 73F3 is a high-frequency server processor released in 2021, built on a 7nm manufacturing process with 16 cores and 32 threads. It operates at a fast base clock frequency of 3.5 GHz with a maximum boost frequency of 4.0 GHz, supported by a large 256 MB L3 cache. Intended for enterprise data center environments, it operates at a base power level of 225W with a maximum power draw of 240W.

Best for Enterprise server applications needing high per-core performance and low cache lBest for Data center deployments requiring high-frequency 16-core processing power

Pros

High 3.5 GHz base clock speed and up to 4.0 GHz boost for strong per-thread performance
Large 256 MB L3 cache reduces memory access latency for cached-sensitive tasks
16 cores and 32 threads provide solid multi-threaded enterprise computing capabilities

Cons

High 225W to 240W power consumption requires substantial server cooling infrastructure
Lacks integrated graphics capability
Locked multiplier prevents manual frequency adjustments

Value for Money

Which is the better deal for the price

Enter today's price for each product to see which offers better value. Use the same currency for both.

Intel Xeon W 3345

Check Price on Amazon

AMD EPYC 73F3

Check Price on Amazon

Performance

Higher benchmark score = faster

Intel Xeon W 334548,140

AMD EPYC 73F346,103

See the raw benchmark values →

Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.

Detailed Specifications

The full spec sheet, side by side

Core Specifications

Feature	Intel Xeon W 3345	AMD EPYC 73F3
Cores	24	16
Threads	48	32
Base Frequency	3 GHz	3.5 GHz17% more
Base Power Consumption	250 W4% more	240 W
Maximum Frequency	4 GHz	4 GHz
Maximum Power Consumption	N/A	240 W
L1 Cache	1,920 KB88% more	1,024 KB
L2 Cache	30 MB275% more	8 MB
L3 Cache	36 MB	256 MB611% more
Lithography Process	10 nm	7 nm30% less
Is unlocked	No	N/A

Integrated Graphics

Feature	Intel Xeon W 3345	AMD EPYC 73F3
Model	N/A	N/A

Benchmark

Feature	Intel Xeon W 3345	AMD EPYC 73F3
PassMark CPU Mark	48,1404% more	46,103

Specification Note

Specifications are compiled from official manufacturer data and other reliable internet sources. Some features may vary by region or model configuration.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Intel Xeon W 3345 vs AMD EPYC 73F3 comparison

They are closely matched: Intel Xeon W 3345 scores 77/100 and AMD EPYC 73F3 scores 76/100 in our overall comparison — within 1 point. Neither is a clear winner overall, so the decision comes down to the specific features and price that matter most to you.

Intel Xeon W 3345 and AMD EPYC 73F3 are compared side by side above across every spec in the cpus category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 77/100 for Intel Xeon W 3345 and 76/100 for AMD EPYC 73F3.

It's close — Intel Xeon W 3345 (77/100) and AMD EPYC 73F3 (76/100) score almost the same. Pick based on price and the individual specs that matter most to you; the comparison above shows where each one pulls ahead.