AMD EPYC 7713 vs AMD EPYC 7443

Updated Nov 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score

For most buyers the AMD EPYC 7713 is the better pick — it scores 82/100 to the AMD EPYC 7443's 63, leading on Core Specifications and Benchmark. Choose the AMD EPYC 7443 instead if you want to spend less.

Verdict

Our overall take, at a glance

AMD EPYC 7713 leads overall

AMD EPYC 7713

AMD EPYC 7443

Why it stands out

Core Specifications L2 Cache: 32 MB (167% more)
Core Specifications L3 Cache: 256 MB (100% more)
Core Specifications Cores: 64

Winner by category for AMD EPYC 7713 vs AMD EPYC 7443
Category	AMD EPYC 7713	AMD EPYC 7443	Winner
Core Specifications	66	38	AMD EPYC 7713
Integrated Graphics	0	0	Tie
Benchmark	90	76	AMD EPYC 7713

In-depth analysisAI

AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Nov 2026.

AMD EPYC 7713

The AMD EPYC 7713 is a 64-core, 128-thread server processor built on a 7nm manufacturing process and designed for high-density enterprise environments. It operates at a base clock frequency of 2.0 GHz with boost speeds reaching up to 3.7 GHz. Equipped with a massive 512 MB L3 cache and a 225W base TDP, it targets demanding server workloads requiring extensive parallel processing capabilities.

Best for High-density server virtualization and cloud infrastructure deploymentsBest for Massively multi-threaded enterprise workloads and scientific computing

Pros

High compute density featuring 64 cores and 128 threads
Generous 512 MB L3 cache to aid data-heavy server applications
Manageable 225W base power consumption given the high core count

Cons

Modest 2.0 GHz base frequency compared to processors with fewer cores
Requires discrete graphics or IPMI server management as it lacks integrated graphics
Locked multiplier prevents any manual frequency tuning

AMD EPYC 7443

The AMD EPYC 7443 is a 24-core, 48-thread enterprise processor designed for server and high-performance workstation platforms. Built on a 7nm lithography process, it offers a base clock speed of 2.9 GHz alongside a maximum boost frequency of 4.0 GHz and 128 MB of L3 cache. With a fixed power consumption profile of 200W, it delivers substantial parallel computing throughput for data-intensive business environments.

Best for Server virtualization and high-density enterprise container deploymentBest for Heavily multi-threaded technical workloads and data processing pipelines

Pros

High multi-threaded performance supported by 24 cores and 48 threads
Large 128 MB L3 cache aids memory-sensitive compute workloads
Reaches boost clock speeds up to 4.0 GHz within a modest 200W power envelope

Cons

No integrated graphics capability, requiring a discrete GPU or management controller for display output
Locked clock multiplier restricts manual performance tuning or overclocking

Value for Money

Which is the better deal for the price

Enter today's price for each product to see which offers better value. Use the same currency for both.

AMD EPYC 7713

Check Price on Amazon

AMD EPYC 7443

Check Price on Amazon

Performance

Higher benchmark score = faster

AMD EPYC 771383,066

AMD EPYC 744356,884

See the raw benchmark values →

Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.

Detailed Specifications

The full spec sheet, side by side

Core Specifications

Feature	AMD EPYC 7713	AMD EPYC 7443
Cores	64	24
Threads	128	48
Base Frequency	2 GHz	2.9 GHz45% more
Base Power Consumption	225 W13% more	200 W
Maximum Frequency	3.7 GHz	4 GHz8% more
Maximum Power Consumption	240 W20% more	200 W
L1 Cache	4,096 KB	N/A
L2 Cache	32 MB167% more	12 MB
L3 Cache	256 MB100% more	128 MB
Lithography Process	7 nm	7 nm
Is unlocked	N/A	N/A

Integrated Graphics

Feature	AMD EPYC 7713	AMD EPYC 7443
Model	N/A	N/A

Benchmark

Feature	AMD EPYC 7713	AMD EPYC 7443
PassMark CPU Mark	83,06646% more	56,884

Specification Note

Specifications are compiled from official manufacturer data and other reliable internet sources. Some features may vary by region or model configuration.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about AMD EPYC 7713 vs AMD EPYC 7443 comparison

Based on our overall comparison score, AMD EPYC 7713 rates higher at 90/100 versus 83/100 for AMD EPYC 7443 — a 7-point lead. AMD EPYC 7713 is the stronger overall pick, though the right choice still depends on which specs matter most to you; the full spec table above breaks down every difference.

AMD EPYC 7713 and AMD EPYC 7443 are compared side by side above across every spec in the cpus category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 90/100 for AMD EPYC 7713 and 83/100 for AMD EPYC 7443.

If you want the higher-rated cpus option overall, AMD EPYC 7713 (90/100) edges out AMD EPYC 7443 (83/100). But if AMD EPYC 7443 is cheaper or stronger on the specific specs you care about, it can still be the better buy — use the spec table and strengths profile above to decide.