AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs AMD EPYC 7443

Updated Nov 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score

For most buyers the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX is the better pick — it scores 85/100 to the AMD EPYC 7443's 65, leading on Core Specifications and Benchmark. Choose the AMD EPYC 7443 instead if you want to spend less.

Verdict

Our overall take, at a glance

Key takeaways

  • AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX leads AMD EPYC 7443 overall by 20 points (85 vs 65 out of 100).
  • AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX stands out on Core Specifications L2 Cache: 32 MB (167% more), Core Specifications L3 Cache: 256 MB (100% more), Benchmark PassMark CPU Mark: 94,761 (67% more).
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX leads overall
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
85
AMD EPYC 7443
65
Why it stands out
  • Core Specifications L2 Cache: 32 MB (167% more)
  • Core Specifications L3 Cache: 256 MB (100% more)
  • Benchmark PassMark CPU Mark: 94,761 (67% more)

In-depth analysisAI

AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Nov 2026.

AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX

The AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO processors are a line of x86-64 microprocessors developed by AMD. The full range includes processors up to 96 cores, offering high core counts for demanding computing tasks. These CPUs are part of the broader Ryzen brand.

Best for high core count computing
Pros
  • Supports architectures up to 96 cores
  • Part of the broad Ryzen microprocessor line including dedicated Threadripper models

AMD EPYC 7443

The AMD EPYC 7443 is a 24-core, 48-thread enterprise processor designed for server and high-performance workstation platforms. Built on a 7nm lithography process, it offers a base clock speed of 2.9 GHz alongside a maximum boost frequency of 4.0 GHz and 128 MB of L3 cache. With a fixed power consumption profile of 200W, it delivers substantial parallel computing throughput for data-intensive business environments.

Best for Server virtualization and high-density enterprise container deploymentBest for Heavily multi-threaded technical workloads and data processing pipelines
Pros
  • High multi-threaded performance supported by 24 cores and 48 threads
  • Large 128 MB L3 cache aids memory-sensitive compute workloads
  • Reaches boost clock speeds up to 4.0 GHz within a modest 200W power envelope
Cons
  • No integrated graphics capability, requiring a discrete GPU or management controller for display output
  • Locked clock multiplier restricts manual performance tuning or overclocking

Value for Money

Which is the better deal for the price

Pre-filled with launch prices where known — enter today's price for an up-to-date check. Use the same currency for both.

AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX

Performance

Higher benchmark score = faster

AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX94,761
AMD EPYC 744356,884

Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.

Detailed Specifications

The full spec sheet, side by side

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs AMD EPYC 7443 comparison

Based on our overall comparison score, AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX rates higher at 93/100 versus 83/100 for AMD EPYC 7443 — a 10-point lead. AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX is the stronger overall pick, though the right choice still depends on which specs matter most to you; the full spec table above breaks down every difference.
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX and AMD EPYC 7443 are compared side by side above across every spec in the cpus category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 93/100 for AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX and 83/100 for AMD EPYC 7443.
If you want the higher-rated cpus option overall, AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX (93/100) edges out AMD EPYC 7443 (83/100). But if AMD EPYC 7443 is cheaper or stronger on the specific specs you care about, it can still be the better buy — use the spec table and strengths profile above to decide.

Which would you buy?

Cast your vote