Intel Xeon W 3375 vs AMD EPYC 74F3

Updated Nov 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score

For most buyers the AMD EPYC 74F3 is the better pick — it scores 81/100 to the Intel Xeon W 3375's 71, leading on Core Specifications. Choose the Intel Xeon W 3375 instead if you want to spend less.

Verdict

Our overall take, at a glance

AMD EPYC 74F3 leads overall

AMD EPYC 74F3

Intel Xeon W 3375

Why it stands out

Core Specifications L3 Cache: 256 MB (349% more)
Core Specifications Lithography Process: 7 nm (30% less)
Core Specifications Base Frequency: 3.2 GHz (28% more)

Winner by category for Intel Xeon W 3375 vs AMD EPYC 74F3
Category	AMD EPYC 74F3	Intel Xeon W 3375	Winner
Core Specifications	77	50	AMD EPYC 74F3
Integrated Graphics	0	0	Tie
Benchmark	83	81	Tie

In-depth analysisAI

AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Nov 2026.

Intel Xeon W 3375

This document is a list documenting Intel Xeon microprocessors organized by generation. It details various models within different core-based architectures, including the 3000 series and 5000 series.

Best for Reference/ResearchBest for Comparison

Pros

The source provides an exhaustive chronological listing of numerous Xeon processors
Processors are categorized based on model lineages (e.g., E31x, X32x, X33x, E52xx)

AMD EPYC 74F3

The AMD EPYC 74F3 is a server and workstation-class processor featuring 24 cores and 48 threads built on a 7nm process. Released in early 2021, it delivers base clock speeds of 3.2 GHz with boost frequencies reaching up to 4.0 GHz alongside a massive 256 MB L3 cache. It is designed for enterprise and workstation environments that demand high frequency per core and significant cache availability for compute-heavy applications.

Best for High-performance workstation tasks that require strong single-thread boost clockBest for Enterprise multithreaded server workloads benefiting from steady 24-core paralle

Pros

High peak clock speeds up to 4.0 GHz alongside a steady 3.2 GHz base frequency
Large 256 MB L3 cache buffer to optimize data-intensive and latency-sensitive tasks
Strong multithreaded performance output with 24 cores and 48 threads

Cons

High 240W thermal design power (TDP) demands robust enterprise cooling solutions
No integrated graphics processor, requiring a discrete GPU for display output
Locked multiplier prevents manual clock speed adjustment

Value for Money

Which is the better deal for the price

Enter today's price for each product to see which offers better value. Use the same currency for both.

Intel Xeon W 3375

Check Price on Amazon

AMD EPYC 74F3

Check Price on Amazon

Performance

Higher benchmark score = faster

Intel Xeon W 337558,686

AMD EPYC 74F360,666

See the raw benchmark values →

Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.

Detailed Specifications

The full spec sheet, side by side

Core Specifications

Feature	Intel Xeon W 3375	AMD EPYC 74F3
Cores	38	24
Threads	76	48
Base Frequency	2.5 GHz	3.2 GHz28% more
Base Power Consumption	270 W13% more	240 W
Maximum Frequency	4 GHz	4 GHz
Maximum Power Consumption	N/A	240 W
L1 Cache	3,040 KB	N/A
L2 Cache	47.5 MB	N/A
L3 Cache	57 MB	256 MB349% more
Lithography Process	10 nm	7 nm30% less
Is unlocked	No	N/A

Integrated Graphics

Feature	Intel Xeon W 3375	AMD EPYC 74F3
Model	N/A	N/A

Benchmark

Feature	Intel Xeon W 3375	AMD EPYC 74F3
PassMark CPU Mark	58,686	60,6663% more

Specification Note

Specifications are compiled from official manufacturer data and other reliable internet sources. Some features may vary by region or model configuration.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Intel Xeon W 3375 vs AMD EPYC 74F3 comparison

They are closely matched: Intel Xeon W 3375 scores 85/100 and AMD EPYC 74F3 scores 84/100 in our overall comparison — within 1 point. Neither is a clear winner overall, so the decision comes down to the specific features and price that matter most to you.

Intel Xeon W 3375 and AMD EPYC 74F3 are compared side by side above across every spec in the cpus category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 85/100 for Intel Xeon W 3375 and 84/100 for AMD EPYC 74F3.

It's close — Intel Xeon W 3375 (85/100) and AMD EPYC 74F3 (84/100) score almost the same. Pick based on price and the individual specs that matter most to you; the comparison above shows where each one pulls ahead.