AMD EPYC 7K62 vs Intel Xeon W 3365

Updated Sep 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score

For most buyers the Intel Xeon W 3365 is the better pick — it scores 76/100 to the AMD EPYC 7K62's 71, leading on Core Specifications. Choose the AMD EPYC 7K62 instead if you want to spend less.

Verdict

Our overall take, at a glance

Intel Xeon W 3365 leads overall

Intel Xeon W 3365

AMD EPYC 7K62

Why it stands out

Core Specifications L2 Cache: 40 MB (67% more)
Core Specifications Maximum Frequency: 4 GHz (21% more)

Winner by category for AMD EPYC 7K62 vs Intel Xeon W 3365
Category	Intel Xeon W 3365	AMD EPYC 7K62	Winner
Core Specifications	68	50	Intel Xeon W 3365
Integrated Graphics	0	0	Tie
Benchmark	81	82	Tie

In-depth analysisAI

AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Sep 2026.

AMD EPYC 7K62

The AMD EPYC 7K62 is a server-oriented processor featuring 48 cores and 96 threads, tailored for high-density virtualization and enterprise computing environments. Released in 2022 and built on a 7-nanometer process, it balances a large 256 MB L3 cache with a moderate 155-watt power consumption profile.

Best for Enterprise virtualization and containerized server deploymentsBest for Data-intensive computing tasks that benefit from large L3 cache sizes

Pros

High core density with 48 physical cores and 96 threads for massive multi-tasking capabilities
Generous 256 MB L3 cache to enhance data retrieval speeds in data-heavy applications
Efficient power envelope of 155 watts relative to its overall core and thread count

Cons

Relatively low maximum frequency of 3.3 GHz which can restrict single-threaded tasks
Locked processor design with no support for overclocking
Does not feature integrated graphics

Intel Xeon W 3365

This is a listing of Intel Xeon processors, cataloging models by their generation and architecture (Source 1). The list serves as a comprehensive resource detailing various Xeon lines for system builders and researchers needing historical product information.

Best for reference buildingBest for historical tech review

Pros

Provides a chronological overview of different processor generations
Classifies processors by core-based versus NetBurst-based architectures
Details numerous models across several architectural eras (e.g., P6, Core, Nehalem)

Cons

The source is purely a massive list and does not offer detailed specifications for any single product
Only listing the inclusion of model names and their processor generation/architecture

Value for Money

Which is the better deal for the price

Enter today's price for each product to see which offers better value. Use the same currency for both.

AMD EPYC 7K62

Check Price on Amazon

Intel Xeon W 3365

Check Price on Amazon

Performance

Higher benchmark score = faster

AMD EPYC 7K6258,822

Intel Xeon W 336557,312

See the raw benchmark values →

Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.

Detailed Specifications

The full spec sheet, side by side

Core Specifications

Feature	AMD EPYC 7K62	Intel Xeon W 3365
Cores	48	32
Threads	96	64
Base Frequency	2.6 GHz	2.7 GHz4% more
Base Power Consumption	N/A	270 W
Maximum Frequency	3.3 GHz	4 GHz21% more
Maximum Power Consumption	N/A	N/A
L1 Cache	3,072 KB20% more	2,560 KB
L2 Cache	24 MB	40 MB67% more
L3 Cache	N/A	48 MB
Lithography Process	7 nm30% less	10 nm
Is unlocked	N/A	No

Integrated Graphics

Feature	AMD EPYC 7K62	Intel Xeon W 3365
Model	N/A	N/A

Benchmark

Feature	AMD EPYC 7K62	Intel Xeon W 3365
PassMark CPU Mark	58,8223% more	57,312

Specification Note

Specifications are compiled from official manufacturer data and other reliable internet sources. Some features may vary by region or model configuration.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about AMD EPYC 7K62 vs Intel Xeon W 3365 comparison

They are closely matched: AMD EPYC 7K62 scores 85/100 and Intel Xeon W 3365 scores 84/100 in our overall comparison — within 1 point. Neither is a clear winner overall, so the decision comes down to the specific features and price that matter most to you.

AMD EPYC 7K62 and Intel Xeon W 3365 are compared side by side above across every spec in the cpus category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 85/100 for AMD EPYC 7K62 and 84/100 for Intel Xeon W 3365.

It's close — AMD EPYC 7K62 (85/100) and Intel Xeon W 3365 (84/100) score almost the same. Pick based on price and the individual specs that matter most to you; the comparison above shows where each one pulls ahead.