Intel Xeon W 3375 vs AMD EPYC 7R12

Updated Sep 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score

For most buyers the Intel Xeon W 3375 is the better pick — it scores 80/100 to the AMD EPYC 7R12's 64, leading on Core Specifications and Benchmark. Choose the AMD EPYC 7R12 instead if you want to spend less.

Verdict

Our overall take, at a glance

Intel Xeon W 3375 leads overall

Intel Xeon W 3375

AMD EPYC 7R12

Why it stands out

Core Specifications L2 Cache: 47.5 MB (98% more)
Core Specifications Maximum Frequency: 4 GHz (21% more)
Benchmark PassMark CPU Mark: 58,686 (20% more)

Winner by category for Intel Xeon W 3375 vs AMD EPYC 7R12
Category	Intel Xeon W 3375	AMD EPYC 7R12	Winner
Core Specifications	70	46	Intel Xeon W 3375
Integrated Graphics	0	0	Tie
Benchmark	84	73	Intel Xeon W 3375

In-depth analysisAI

AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Sep 2026.

Intel Xeon W 3375

This document is a list documenting Intel Xeon microprocessors organized by generation. It details various models within different core-based architectures, including the 3000 series and 5000 series.

Best for Reference/ResearchBest for Comparison

Pros

The source provides an exhaustive chronological listing of numerous Xeon processors
Processors are categorized based on model lineages (e.g., E31x, X32x, X33x, E52xx)

AMD EPYC 7R12

The AMD EPYC 7R12 is a server-class processor engineered for enterprise operations and cloud infrastructure demanding high parallel processing capabilities. Built on a 7nm manufacturing process, this chip provides 48 cores, 96 threads, and a generous 192 MB of L3 cache to handle intensive data-center workloads. It is designed to operate reliably within a steady 200-watt power limit.

Best for Enterprise virtualization and handling multiple simultaneous virtual machinesBest for Large-scale database hosting and cache-dependent server workloads

Pros

High core density with 48 physical cores and 96 virtual threads for massive parallelism
Generous 192 MB of L3 cache to improve data access speeds and reduce latency
Efficient 7-nanometer lithography that delivers substantial processing power within a 200W power envelope

Cons

Modest base clock speed of 2.2 GHz which may limit single-threaded performance
Locked multiplier prevents hardware optimization through overclocking
No integrated graphics processor included

Value for Money

Which is the better deal for the price

Enter today's price for each product to see which offers better value. Use the same currency for both.

Intel Xeon W 3375

Check Price on Amazon

AMD EPYC 7R12

Check Price on Amazon

Performance

Higher benchmark score = faster

Intel Xeon W 337558,686

AMD EPYC 7R1248,934

See the raw benchmark values →

Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.

Detailed Specifications

The full spec sheet, side by side

Core Specifications

Feature	Intel Xeon W 3375	AMD EPYC 7R12
Cores	38	48
Threads	76	96
Base Frequency	2.5 GHz14% more	2.2 GHz
Base Power Consumption	270 W	N/A
Maximum Frequency	4 GHz21% more	3.3 GHz
Maximum Power Consumption	N/A	N/A
L1 Cache	3,040 KB	3,072 KB
L2 Cache	47.5 MB98% more	24 MB
L3 Cache	57 MB	N/A
Lithography Process	10 nm	7 nm30% less
Is unlocked	No	N/A

Integrated Graphics

Feature	Intel Xeon W 3375	AMD EPYC 7R12
Model	N/A	N/A

Benchmark

Feature	Intel Xeon W 3375	AMD EPYC 7R12
PassMark CPU Mark	58,68620% more	48,934

Specification Note

Specifications are compiled from official manufacturer data and other reliable internet sources. Some features may vary by region or model configuration.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Intel Xeon W 3375 vs AMD EPYC 7R12 comparison

Based on our overall comparison score, Intel Xeon W 3375 rates higher at 85/100 versus 81/100 for AMD EPYC 7R12 — a 4-point lead. Intel Xeon W 3375 is the stronger overall pick, though the right choice still depends on which specs matter most to you; the full spec table above breaks down every difference.

Intel Xeon W 3375 and AMD EPYC 7R12 are compared side by side above across every spec in the cpus category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 85/100 for Intel Xeon W 3375 and 81/100 for AMD EPYC 7R12.

If you want the higher-rated cpus option overall, Intel Xeon W 3375 (85/100) edges out AMD EPYC 7R12 (81/100). But if AMD EPYC 7R12 is cheaper or stronger on the specific specs you care about, it can still be the better buy — use the spec table and strengths profile above to decide.