Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C vs AMD EPYC 7T83

Updated Sep 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score

For most buyers the AMD EPYC 7T83 is the better pick — it scores 80/100 to the Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C's 77, leading on Benchmark. Choose the Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C instead if core specifications matters most to you, where it comes out ahead.

Verdict

Our overall take, at a glance

AMD EPYC 7T83 and Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C are closely matched

AMD EPYC 7T83

Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C

Where AMD EPYC 7T83 stands out

Core Specifications Cores: 64
Core Specifications Threads: 128
Benchmark PassMark CPU Mark: 81,757 (45% more)

Where Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C stands out

Core Specifications Base Frequency: 2.9 GHz (16% more)

Winner by category for Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C vs AMD EPYC 7T83
Category	AMD EPYC 7T83	Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C	Winner
Core Specifications	64	79	Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C
Integrated Graphics	0	0	Tie
Benchmark	90	75	AMD EPYC 7T83

In-depth analysisAI

AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Sep 2026.

Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C

This is an Intel Xeon processor part of the Ice Lake-based series, utilizing a dual-processor socket design. The specific model number was not available in the provided sources.

AMD EPYC 7T83

The AMD EPYC 7T83 is a server-oriented processor launched in 2022 that is built on a 7-nanometer lithography process. With 64 cores and 128 threads, this enterprise chip is engineered to handle highly parallelized server workloads and demanding data center applications.

Best for Enterprise virtualization and high-density cloud computingBest for Highly parallelized database operations and data center workloads

Pros

High-density compute architecture with 64 cores and 128 threads
Large 512 MB L3 cache to facilitate rapid data access
Strong multi-threaded performance potential

Cons

High power requirements with a constant 280-watt TDP
No built-in integrated graphics
Locked multiplier prevents any overclocking

Value for Money

Which is the better deal for the price

Enter today's price for each product to see which offers better value. Use the same currency for both.

Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C

Check Price on Amazon

AMD EPYC 7T83

Check Price on Amazon

Performance

Higher benchmark score = faster

Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C56,202

AMD EPYC 7T8381,757

See the raw benchmark values →

Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.

Detailed Specifications

The full spec sheet, side by side

Core Specifications

Feature	Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C	AMD EPYC 7T83
Cores	32	64
Threads	64	128
Base Frequency	2.9 GHz16% more	2.5 GHz
Base Power Consumption	300 W	N/A
Maximum Frequency	3.5 GHz	3.5 GHz
Maximum Power Consumption	N/A	N/A
L1 Cache	2,560 KB	N/A
L2 Cache	40 MB	N/A
L3 Cache	54 MB	N/A
Lithography Process	10 nm	7 nm30% less
Is unlocked	No	N/A

Integrated Graphics

Feature	Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C	AMD EPYC 7T83
Model	N/A	N/A

Benchmark

Feature	Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C	AMD EPYC 7T83
PassMark CPU Mark	56,202	81,75745% more

Specification Note

Specifications are compiled from official manufacturer data and other reliable internet sources. Some features may vary by region or model configuration.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C vs AMD EPYC 7T83 comparison

They are closely matched: Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C scores 84/100 and AMD EPYC 7T83 scores 82/100 in our overall comparison — within 2 points. Neither is a clear winner overall, so the decision comes down to the specific features and price that matter most to you.

Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C and AMD EPYC 7T83 are compared side by side above across every spec in the cpus category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 84/100 for Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C and 82/100 for AMD EPYC 7T83.

It's close — Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C (84/100) and AMD EPYC 7T83 (82/100) score almost the same. Pick based on price and the individual specs that matter most to you; the comparison above shows where each one pulls ahead.