AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 vs Intel Xeon Gold 6248R

Updated Nov 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score

For most buyers the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 is the better pick — it scores 63/100 to the Intel Xeon Gold 6248R's 57, leading on Core Specifications. Choose the Intel Xeon Gold 6248R instead if benchmark matters most to you, where it comes out ahead.

Verdict

Our overall take, at a glance

Key takeaways

  • AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 leads Intel Xeon Gold 6248R overall by 6 points (63 vs 57 out of 100).
  • AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 stands out on Core Specifications L3 Cache: 64 MB (79% more), Core Specifications Lithography Process: 7 nm (50% less), Core Specifications Maximum Frequency: 4.7 GHz (18% more).
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 leads overall
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 5945
63
Intel Xeon Gold 6248R
57
Why it stands out
  • Core Specifications L3 Cache: 64 MB (79% more)
  • Core Specifications Lithography Process: 7 nm (50% less)
  • Core Specifications Maximum Frequency: 4.7 GHz (18% more)

In-depth analysisAI

AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Nov 2026.

AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 5945

The AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 is a 12-core, 24-thread desktop processor designed for enterprise environments requiring strong multithreaded performance within tight power budgets. Built on a 7nm process for the AM4 platform, it operates at a 65W base power rating with clock speeds scaling from 3 GHz up to a maximum boost of 4.7 GHz. It is geared toward professional desktop workstations that need heavy multi-core processing capability without requiring high-end cooling systems.

Best for Enterprise workstations needing high multi-threaded compute in power-restricted Best for Small-form-factor builds that require high core counts under a 65W thermal budge
Pros
  • High 12-core and 24-thread configuration for intensive multi-threaded workloads
  • Low 65W power envelope minimizes thermal and cooling requirements
  • Generous 64 MB of L3 cache to support memory-heavy tasks
Cons
  • Lacks integrated graphics, necessitating a dedicated graphics card for display output
  • Multiplier is locked, preventing traditional processor overclocking
  • Uses the older AM4 platform socket

Intel Xeon Gold 6248R

This list details various Intel Xeon microprocessors organized by their specific underlying architecture and generation. It serves as an index for generations of processors spanning multiple decades.

Pros
  • The sources provide a chronological overview of Intel Xeon processor developments.
  • Architectures are clearly segregated (e.g., P6-based, Core-based, various series).
Cons
  • The provided source only contains an indexed list and does not offer specific technical details for the Xeon Gold 6248R.

Value for Money

Which is the better deal for the price

Enter today's price for each product to see which offers better value. Use the same currency for both.

AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 5945

Intel Xeon Gold 6248R

Performance

Higher benchmark score = faster

AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 594534,374
Intel Xeon Gold 6248R36,067

Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.

Detailed Specifications

The full spec sheet, side by side

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 vs Intel Xeon Gold 6248R comparison

They are closely matched: AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 scores 67/100 and Intel Xeon Gold 6248R scores 67/100 in our overall comparison — within 1 points. Neither is a clear winner overall, so the decision comes down to the specific features and price that matter most to you.
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 and Intel Xeon Gold 6248R are compared side by side above across every spec in the cpus category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 67/100 for AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 and 67/100 for Intel Xeon Gold 6248R.
It's close — AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 (67/100) and Intel Xeon Gold 6248R (67/100) score almost the same. Pick based on price and the individual specs that matter most to you; the comparison above shows where each one pulls ahead.

Which would you buy?

Cast your vote