Intel Xeon W 3323 vs Apple M1 Max 10 Core

Updated Jun 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score

For most buyers the Intel Xeon W 3323 is the better pick — it scores 66/100 to the Apple M1 Max 10 Core's 51, leading on Core Specifications and Benchmark. Choose the Apple M1 Max 10 Core instead if you want to spend less.

Verdict

Our overall take, at a glance

Key takeaways

  • Intel Xeon W 3323 leads Apple M1 Max 10 Core overall by 15 points (66 vs 51 out of 100).
  • Intel Xeon W 3323 stands out on Core Specifications Cores: 12, Core Specifications Threads: 24, Benchmark PassMark CPU Mark: 27,822 (26% more).
Intel Xeon W 3323 leads overall
Intel Xeon W 3323
66
Apple M1 Max 10 Core
51
Why it stands out
  • Core Specifications Cores: 12
  • Core Specifications Threads: 24
  • Benchmark PassMark CPU Mark: 27,822 (26% more)

In-depth analysisAI

AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Jun 2026.

Intel Xeon W 3323

The Intel Xeon W processor family includes models spanning various generations of CPU technology. The listing shows a range of processors from the Core-based and 5000 series architectures. Users select these processors based on their required computational performance (Source 1).

Best for Comparison Reference
Pros
  • Part of the general list of Intel Xeon microprocessors (Source 1)

Apple M1 Max 10 Core

The Apple M1 Max processor is a high-performance, professional-grade chip designed for powerful computing tasks. Its architecture separates general computation from advanced graphical and media workloads. This CPU/GPU combination suits users who require peak efficiency and raw power for demanding applications.

Best for Video EditingBest for 3D RenderingBest for Professional Design/Development
Pros
  • Features a robust core structure combining multiple high-performance and energy-efficient CPU cores
  • Offers extensive memory capacity up to 64GB using LPDDR5 technology
  • Provides highly scalable GPU acceleration due to its multi-core design (up to 32 cores)
  • Designed with high transistor counts (57 billion) for complex and demanding tasks (Source 1)
Cons
  • The chip is designed for mobile/desktop integration, potentially limiting some standalone upgrade options
  • Requires modern operating systems to fully utilize its advanced ARM architecture capabilities
  • Is positioned at a higher end of Apple's silicon product line

Value for Money

Which is the better deal for the price

Enter today's price for each product to see which offers better value. Use the same currency for both.

Intel Xeon W 3323

Apple M1 Max 10 Core

Performance

Higher benchmark score = faster

Intel Xeon W 332327,822
Apple M1 Max 10 Core22,155

Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.

Detailed Specifications

The full spec sheet, side by side

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Intel Xeon W 3323 vs Apple M1 Max 10 Core comparison

They are closely matched: Intel Xeon W 3323 scores 56/100 and Apple M1 Max 10 Core scores 55/100 in our overall comparison — within 1 point. Neither is a clear winner overall, so the decision comes down to the specific features and price that matter most to you.
Intel Xeon W 3323 and Apple M1 Max 10 Core are compared side by side above across every spec in the cpus category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 56/100 for Intel Xeon W 3323 and 55/100 for Apple M1 Max 10 Core.
It's close — Intel Xeon W 3323 (56/100) and Apple M1 Max 10 Core (55/100) score almost the same. Pick based on price and the individual specs that matter most to you; the comparison above shows where each one pulls ahead.

Which would you buy?

Cast your vote