Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C vs Intel Xeon W 3323

Updated Jun 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score

For most buyers the Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C is the better pick — it scores 82/100 to the Intel Xeon W 3323's 43, leading on Core Specifications and Benchmark. Choose the Intel Xeon W 3323 instead if you want to spend less.

Verdict

Our overall take, at a glance

Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C leads overall

Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C

Intel Xeon W 3323

Why it stands out

Core Specifications L2 Cache: 40 MB (167% more)
Core Specifications L3 Cache: 54 MB (157% more)
Benchmark PassMark CPU Mark: 56,202 (102% more)

Winner by category for Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C vs Intel Xeon W 3323
Category	Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C	Intel Xeon W 3323	Winner
Core Specifications	68	31	Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C
Integrated Graphics	0	0	Tie
Benchmark	88	49	Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C

In-depth analysisAI

AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Jun 2026.

Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C

This is an Intel Xeon processor part of the Ice Lake-based series, utilizing a dual-processor socket design. The specific model number was not available in the provided sources.

Intel Xeon W 3323

The Intel Xeon W processor family includes models spanning various generations of CPU technology. The listing shows a range of processors from the Core-based and 5000 series architectures. Users select these processors based on their required computational performance (Source 1).

Best for Comparison Reference

Pros

Part of the general list of Intel Xeon microprocessors (Source 1)

Value for Money

Which is the better deal for the price

Enter today's price for each product to see which offers better value. Use the same currency for both.

Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C

Check Price on Amazon

Intel Xeon W 3323

Check Price on Amazon

Performance

Higher benchmark score = faster

Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C56,202

Intel Xeon W 332327,822

See the raw benchmark values →

Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.

Detailed Specifications

The full spec sheet, side by side

Core Specifications

Feature	Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C	Intel Xeon W 3323
Cores	32	12
Threads	64	24
Base Frequency	2.9 GHz	3.5 GHz21% more
Base Power Consumption	300 W36% more	220 W
Maximum Frequency	3.5 GHz	3.9 GHz11% more
Maximum Power Consumption	N/A	N/A
L1 Cache	2,560 KB	N/A
L2 Cache	40 MB167% more	15 MB
L3 Cache	54 MB157% more	21 MB
Lithography Process	10 nm	10 nm
Is unlocked	No	No

Integrated Graphics

Feature	Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C	Intel Xeon W 3323
Model	N/A	N/A

Benchmark

Feature	Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C	Intel Xeon W 3323
PassMark CPU Mark	56,202102% more	27,822

Specification Note

Specifications are compiled from official manufacturer data and other reliable internet sources. Some features may vary by region or model configuration.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C vs Intel Xeon W 3323 comparison

Based on our overall comparison score, Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C rates higher at 84/100 versus 56/100 for Intel Xeon W 3323 — a 28-point lead. Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C is the stronger overall pick, though the right choice still depends on which specs matter most to you; the full spec table above breaks down every difference.

Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C and Intel Xeon W 3323 are compared side by side above across every spec in the cpus category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 84/100 for Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C and 56/100 for Intel Xeon W 3323.

If you want the higher-rated cpus option overall, Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C (84/100) edges out Intel Xeon W 3323 (56/100). But if Intel Xeon W 3323 is cheaper or stronger on the specific specs you care about, it can still be the better buy — use the spec table and strengths profile above to decide.