Intel Core i9 12900F vs Intel Core Ultra X7 368H

Updated Nov 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score

The Intel Core i9 12900F and Intel Core Ultra X7 368H are closely matched at 61 and 61/100. The Intel Core i9 12900F edges ahead on Benchmark, while the Intel Core Ultra X7 368H leads on Core Specifications and Integrated Graphics — pick the one whose strengths match what you'll actually use.

Verdict

Our overall take, at a glance

Intel Core i9 12900F and Intel Core Ultra X7 368H are closely matched

Intel Core i9 12900F

Intel Core Ultra X7 368H

Where Intel Core i9 12900F stands out

Core Specifications Base Power Consumption: 65 W (160% more)
Core Specifications Maximum Power Consumption: 202 W (153% more)
Core Specifications L3 Cache: 30 MB (67% more)

Where Intel Core Ultra X7 368H stands out

Core Specifications L2 Cache: 24 MB (71% more)
Core Specifications L1 Cache: 1,600 KB (14% more)

Winner by category for Intel Core i9 12900F vs Intel Core Ultra X7 368H
Category	Intel Core i9 12900F	Intel Core Ultra X7 368H	Winner
Core Specifications	51	59	Intel Core Ultra X7 368H
Integrated Graphics	0	56	Intel Core Ultra X7 368H
Benchmark	67	63	Intel Core i9 12900F

In-depth analysisAI

AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Nov 2026.

Intel Core i9 12900F

The Intel Core i9 12900F is a desktop processor built for the LGA1700 platform, featuring 16 cores and 24 threads. It runs at a base clock speed of 2.4 GHz and can boost up to 5.1 GHz for demanding computational tasks. Designed without integrated graphics or overclocking support, this CPU is aimed at performance-focused users who plan to use a discrete graphics card.

Best for Desktops built primarily for gaming with a dedicated graphics cardBest for Content creation and video rendering builds that do not require CPU overclocking

Pros

High 16-core, 24-thread configuration for heavy multi-threaded workloads
Boost clock speeds reaching up to 5.1 GHz
Modest 65W base power consumption under standard operation

Cons

Lacks integrated graphics, requiring a discrete GPU for display output
Locked processor multiplier prevents manual overclocking
Maximum power consumption scales up to 202W under peak loads

Intel Core Ultra X7 368H

The Intel Core Ultra X7 368H is a high-performance mobile processor designed to handle demanding computing workloads. With a PassMark CPU Mark score of 37500, this chip is built for users requiring substantial processing power in portable form factors.

Best for Resource-heavy applications and demanding multitasking workloads

Pros

Strong multi-threaded performance with a PassMark score of 37500
Capable of handling intensive productivity and creative tasks

Cons

Limited official specifications and architectural details are currently available beyond initial benchmark data

Value for Money

Which is the better deal for the price

Pre-filled with launch prices where known — enter today's price for an up-to-date check. Use the same currency for both.

Intel Core i9 12900F

Check Price on Amazon

Intel Core Ultra X7 368H

Check Price on Amazon

Performance

Higher benchmark score = faster

Intel Core i9 12900F35,748

Intel Core Ultra X7 368H33,547

See the raw benchmark values →

Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.

Detailed Specifications

The full spec sheet, side by side

Core Specifications

Feature	Intel Core i9 12900F	Intel Core Ultra X7 368H
Cores	16	16
Threads	24	16
Base Frequency	2.4 GHz	N/A
Base Power Consumption	65 W160% more	25 W
Maximum Frequency	5.1 GHz	5 GHz
Maximum Power Consumption	202 W153% more	80 W
L1 Cache	1,408 KB	1,600 KB14% more
L2 Cache	14 MB	24 MB71% more
L3 Cache	30 MB67% more	18 MB
Lithography Process	7 nm	N/A
Is unlocked	No	N/A

Integrated Graphics

Feature	Intel Core i9 12900F	Intel Core Ultra X7 368H
Model	N/A

Benchmark

Feature	Intel Core i9 12900F	Intel Core Ultra X7 368H
PassMark CPU Mark	35,7487% more	33,547

Specification Note

Specifications are compiled from official manufacturer data and other reliable internet sources. Some features may vary by region or model configuration.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Intel Core i9 12900F vs Intel Core Ultra X7 368H comparison

They are closely matched: Intel Core i9 12900F scores 67/100 and Intel Core Ultra X7 368H scores 67/100 in our overall comparison — within 1 points. Neither is a clear winner overall, so the decision comes down to the specific features and price that matter most to you.

Intel Core i9 12900F and Intel Core Ultra X7 368H are compared side by side above across every spec in the cpus category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 67/100 for Intel Core i9 12900F and 67/100 for Intel Core Ultra X7 368H.

It's close — Intel Core i9 12900F (67/100) and Intel Core Ultra X7 368H (67/100) score almost the same. Pick based on price and the individual specs that matter most to you; the comparison above shows where each one pulls ahead.