Intel Core i9 12900KS vs Intel Xeon W 3335

Updated Nov 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score

For most buyers the Intel Core i9 12900KS is the better pick — it scores 68/100 to the Intel Xeon W 3335's 59, leading on Core Specifications and Integrated Graphics. Choose the Intel Xeon W 3335 instead if you want to spend less.

Verdict

Our overall take, at a glance

Key takeaways

  • Intel Core i9 12900KS leads Intel Xeon W 3335 overall by 9 points (68 vs 59 out of 100).
  • Intel Core i9 12900KS stands out on Core Specifications Maximum Frequency: 5.5 GHz (38% more), Core Specifications Lithography Process: 7 nm (30% less), Core Specifications L3 Cache: 30 MB (25% more).
Intel Core i9 12900KS leads overall
Intel Core i9 12900KS
68
Intel Xeon W 3335
59
Why it stands out
  • Core Specifications Maximum Frequency: 5.5 GHz (38% more)
  • Core Specifications Lithography Process: 7 nm (30% less)
  • Core Specifications L3 Cache: 30 MB (25% more)

In-depth analysisAI

AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Nov 2026.

Intel Core i9 12900KS

The Intel Core i9 12900KS is a top-tier desktop processor designed for the LGA1700 platform, equipped with 16 cores and 24 threads. It features a maximum boost clock frequency of up to 5.5 GHz alongside integrated Intel UHD Graphics 770. Built for enthusiasts and demanding power users, it prioritizes extreme single-core and multi-core performance, though it demands a robust cooling solution to manage its thermal output.

Best for High-framerate PC gaming requiring top-tier single-core clock speedsBest for Demanding multi-threaded tasks such as video rendering and 3D animation
Pros
  • High peak clock speeds reaching up to 5.5 GHz
  • 16 cores and 24 threads provide strong multi-threaded performance
  • Unlocked design allows for manual user overclocking
  • Includes integrated Intel UHD Graphics 770 for display output without a discrete GPU
Cons
  • High maximum power consumption reaching 241 W under heavy workloads
  • 150 W base power requirement requires substantial thermal management

Intel Xeon W 3335

The provided source is a comprehensive list of Intel Xeon processors categorized by generation. It tracks the evolution of various processor lines, but it does not provide specific details for the Intel Xeon W 3335 model.

Cons
  • No specifications or data available for this specific model in the provided source.

Value for Money

Which is the better deal for the price

Pre-filled with launch prices where known — enter today's price for an up-to-date check. Use the same currency for both.

Intel Core i9 12900KS

Intel Xeon W 3335

Performance

Higher benchmark score = faster

Intel Core i9 12900KS43,378
Intel Xeon W 333539,293

Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.

Review Videos

Hand-picked expert reviews for each product

Detailed Specifications

The full spec sheet, side by side

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Intel Core i9 12900KS vs Intel Xeon W 3335 comparison

They are closely matched: Intel Core i9 12900KS scores 70/100 and Intel Xeon W 3335 scores 69/100 in our overall comparison — within 1 point. Neither is a clear winner overall, so the decision comes down to the specific features and price that matter most to you.
Intel Core i9 12900KS and Intel Xeon W 3335 are compared side by side above across every spec in the cpus category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 70/100 for Intel Core i9 12900KS and 69/100 for Intel Xeon W 3335.
It's close — Intel Core i9 12900KS (70/100) and Intel Xeon W 3335 (69/100) score almost the same. Pick based on price and the individual specs that matter most to you; the comparison above shows where each one pulls ahead.

Which would you buy?

Cast your vote