Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C vs Intel Core Ultra 5 245K

Updated Nov 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score

For most buyers the Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C is the better pick — it scores 73/100 to the Intel Core Ultra 5 245K's 63, leading on Benchmark. Choose the Intel Core Ultra 5 245K instead if core specifications and integrated graphics matter most to you, where it comes out ahead.

Verdict

Our overall take, at a glance

Key takeaways

  • Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C leads Intel Core Ultra 5 245K overall by 10 points (73 vs 63 out of 100).
  • Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C stands out on Core Specifications Base Power Consumption: 300 W (140% more), Core Specifications L3 Cache: 54 MB (125% more), Core Specifications L1 Cache: 2,560 KB (78% more).
Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C leads overall
Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C
73
Intel Core Ultra 5 245K
63
Why it stands out
  • Core Specifications Base Power Consumption: 300 W (140% more)
  • Core Specifications L3 Cache: 54 MB (125% more)
  • Core Specifications L1 Cache: 2,560 KB (78% more)

In-depth analysisAI

AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Nov 2026.

Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C

This is an Intel Xeon processor part of the Ice Lake-based series, utilizing a dual-processor socket design. The specific model number was not available in the provided sources.

Intel Core Ultra 5 245K

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245K is a mid-range desktop processor belonging to Intel's Core Ultra 200S series (Arrow Lake generation). Built for general desktop computing, it targets users who need a balance of everyday system performance and content creation capabilities. However, third-party benchmarks highlight significant performance trade-offs, particularly for PC gaming enthusiasts.

Best for Productivity-focused desktop builds prioritizing power efficiency over peak gamiBest for Content creation tasks like video editing and 3D rendering on a mid-range budget
Pros
  • Improved power efficiency and thermal management during operation
  • Solid performance in creative and productivity applications such as rendering and photo editing
Cons
  • Underwhelming and unexpectedly slow performance in gaming workloads compared to expectations
  • Poor cost-per-frame value for dedicated gaming builds

Value for Money

Which is the better deal for the price

Pre-filled with launch prices where known — enter today's price for an up-to-date check. Use the same currency for both.

Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C

Intel Core Ultra 5 245K

Performance

Higher benchmark score = faster

Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C56,202
Intel Core Ultra 5 245K42,980

Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.

Review Videos

Hand-picked expert reviews for each product

Detailed Specifications

The full spec sheet, side by side

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C vs Intel Core Ultra 5 245K comparison

Based on our overall comparison score, Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C rates higher at 84/100 versus 72/100 for Intel Core Ultra 5 245K — a 12-point lead. Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C is the stronger overall pick, though the right choice still depends on which specs matter most to you; the full spec table above breaks down every difference.
Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C and Intel Core Ultra 5 245K are compared side by side above across every spec in the cpus category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 84/100 for Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C and 72/100 for Intel Core Ultra 5 245K.
If you want the higher-rated cpus option overall, Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C (84/100) edges out Intel Core Ultra 5 245K (72/100). But if Intel Core Ultra 5 245K is cheaper or stronger on the specific specs you care about, it can still be the better buy — use the spec table and strengths profile above to decide.

Which would you buy?

Cast your vote