Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
Intel Xeon Platinum 8380
VS
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX vs Intel Xeon D 1736NT
Updated Sep 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score
Verdict
Key takeaways
- Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX leads Intel Xeon D 1736NT overall by 57 points (85 vs 28 out of 100).
- Key differences: PassMark CPU mark, where Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX has 55,677 vs 17,826; L3 cache, where Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX has 36 MB vs 15 MB; L2 cache, where Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX has 40 MB vs 10 MB; lithography process, where Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX has 3 vs 10 nm; cores, where Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX has 24 vs 8.
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX leads overall
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX · 81 overall, #47 of 470
85
Intel Xeon D 1736NT · 41 overall, #319 of 470
28
Key differences
- PassMark CPU MarkIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX 55,677 vs 17,826
- L3 CacheIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX 36 MB vs 15 MB
- L2 CacheIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX 40 MB vs 10 MB
- Lithography ProcessIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX 3 vs 10 nm
- CoresIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX 24 vs 8
Scores by Category
Core Ultra 9 275HX wins 3 of 3 categories
| Category | Core Ultra 9 275HXXeon D 1736NT | Lead |
|---|---|---|
| Benchmark | +59 | |
| Core Specifications | +64 | |
| Integrated Graphics | +44 |
Value for Money
Enter today's price for each product (same currency for all).
Core Ultra 9 275HX
Xeon D 1736NT
Detailed Specifications
Core Specifications
| Feature | Core Ultra 9 275HX | Xeon D 1736NT |
|---|---|---|
Cores | 24 | 8 |
Threads | 24 | 16 |
Base Frequency | 2.7 GHz | 2.7 GHz |
Base Power Consumption | 55 W18% less | 67 W |
Maximum Frequency | 5.4 GHz54% more | 3.5 GHz |
Maximum Power Consumption | 160 W | N/A |
L1 Cache | 2,432 KB280% more | 640 KB |
L2 Cache | 40 MB300% more | 10 MB |
L3 Cache | 36 MB140% more | 15 MB |
Lithography Process | 3 nm70% less | 10 nm |
Is unlocked | N/A | No |
Integrated Graphics
| Feature | Core Ultra 9 275HX | Xeon D 1736NT |
|---|---|---|
Model | N/A |
Benchmark
| Feature | Core Ultra 9 275HX | Xeon D 1736NT |
|---|---|---|
PassMark CPU Mark | 55,677212% more | 17,826 |
Specification Note
Specifications are compiled from official manufacturer data and other reliable internet sources. Some features may vary by region or model configuration.
Which would you buy?
Cast your voteOther Popular Comparisons
Intel Xeon D 1736NT
Intel Xeon Platinum 8380
VS
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
Intel Xeon W 3375
VS
Intel Xeon D 1736NT
Intel Xeon W 3375
VS
Intel Core i9 14900KF
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
VS
Intel Core i9 14900KF
Intel Xeon D 1736NT
VS
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
VS
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
Intel Xeon D 1736NT
VS
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C
VS
Intel Xeon D 1736NT
Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C
VS
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
Intel Xeon W 3365
VS
Intel Xeon D 1736NT
Intel Xeon W 3365
VS