Intel Xeon W 3365 vs Intel Xeon D 1736NT

Updated Jun 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score

Verdict

Key takeaways

  • Intel Xeon W 3365 leads Intel Xeon D 1736NT overall by 52 points (83 vs 31 out of 100).
  • Key differences: PassMark CPU mark, where Intel Xeon W 3365 has 57,312 vs 17,826; L3 cache, where Intel Xeon W 3365 has 48 MB vs 15 MB; L2 cache, where Intel Xeon W 3365 has 40 MB vs 10 MB; cores, where Intel Xeon W 3365 has 32 vs 8; threads, where Intel Xeon W 3365 has 64 vs 16.
Intel Xeon W 3365 leads overall
Intel Xeon W 3365 · 84 overall, #32 of 470
83
Intel Xeon D 1736NT · 41 overall, #319 of 470
31
Key differences
  • PassMark CPU MarkIntel Xeon W 3365 57,312 vs 17,826
  • L3 CacheIntel Xeon W 3365 48 MB vs 15 MB
  • L2 CacheIntel Xeon W 3365 40 MB vs 10 MB
  • CoresIntel Xeon W 3365 32 vs 8
  • ThreadsIntel Xeon W 3365 64 vs 16

Scores by Category

Xeon W 3365 wins 2 of 2 categories

CategoryXeon W 3365Xeon D 1736NTLead
Benchmark
+60
Core Specifications
+37

Value for Money

Enter today's price for each product (same currency for all).

Detailed Specifications

Core Specifications

Feature
Xeon W 3365
Xeon D 1736NT
Cores
32
8
Threads
64
16
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
2.7 GHz
Base Power Consumption
270 W
67 W75% less
Maximum Frequency
4 GHz14% more
3.5 GHz
L1 Cache
2,560 KB300% more
640 KB
L2 Cache
40 MB300% more
10 MB
L3 Cache
48 MB220% more
15 MB
Lithography Process
10 nm
10 nm
Is unlocked
No
No

Benchmark

Feature
Xeon W 3365
Xeon D 1736NT
PassMark CPU Mark
57,312222% more
17,826

Specification Note

Specifications are compiled from official manufacturer data and other reliable internet sources. Some features may vary by region or model configuration.

Which would you buy?

Cast your vote