Intel Core Ultra X9 388H vs Intel Core Ultra 9 386H

Updated Nov 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score

The Intel Core Ultra X9 388H and Intel Core Ultra 9 386H are closely matched at 60 and 58/100. The Intel Core Ultra X9 388H edges ahead on Integrated Graphics, while the Intel Core Ultra 9 386H leads on value — pick the one whose strengths match what you'll actually use.

Verdict

Our overall take, at a glance

Key takeaways

  • Intel Core Ultra X9 388H and Intel Core Ultra 9 386H are closely matched overall (within 2 points).
  • Intel Core Ultra X9 388H stands out on Integrated Graphics Model: Intel Arc B390.
Intel Core Ultra X9 388H and Intel Core Ultra 9 386H are closely matched
Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
60
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
58
Where Intel Core Ultra X9 388H stands out
  • Integrated Graphics Model: Intel Arc B390

In-depth analysisAI

AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Nov 2026.

Intel Core Ultra X9 388H

The Intel Core Ultra X9 388H is a high-performance mobile processor featuring 16 cores and 16 threads, designed for demanding laptop applications. It scales from a 25-watt base power consumption up to 80 watts maximum, pairing a 5.1 GHz maximum frequency with integrated Intel Arc B390 graphics.

Best for high-performance content creation laptopsBest for demanding mobile computing and gaming systems
Pros
  • High maximum frequency of 5.1 GHz for demanding workloads
  • Robust multi-core performance with 16 cores and 16 threads
  • Generous 24 MB L2 cache and 18 MB L3 cache configuration
  • Capable Intel Arc B390 integrated graphics
Cons
  • High power consumption scaling up to 80 watts under maximum load
  • May require robust laptop thermal solutions to maintain peak performance

Intel Core Ultra 9 386H

The Intel Core Ultra 9 386H is a high-performance mobile processor designed for premium, power-oriented laptop computers. Featuring a robust PassMark CPU Mark score of 44,000, this system-on-chip is engineered to handle demanding computational workloads and heavy multitasking on the go.

Best for Intense multi-threaded workflows such as video rendering, 3D compilation, and…Best for Premium gaming laptops and high-end mobile workstations
Pros
  • Delivers exceptional multi-threaded performance, validated by a PassMark score of 44,000
  • Tailored for high-end portable computing setups requiring desktop-class processing power
Cons
  • High performance potential typically results in increased thermal output and elevated power consumption under load

Value for Money

Which is the better deal for the price

Enter today's price for each product to see which offers better value. Use the same currency for both.

Intel Core Ultra X9 388H

Intel Core Ultra 9 386H

Performance

Higher benchmark score = faster

Intel Core Ultra X9 388H36,504
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H36,183

Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.

Detailed Specifications

The full spec sheet, side by side

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Intel Core Ultra X9 388H vs Intel Core Ultra 9 386H comparison

They are closely matched: Intel Core Ultra X9 388H scores 69/100 and Intel Core Ultra 9 386H scores 68/100 in our overall comparison — within 1 point. Neither is a clear winner overall, so the decision comes down to the specific features and price that matter most to you.
Intel Core Ultra X9 388H and Intel Core Ultra 9 386H are compared side by side above across every spec in the cpus category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 69/100 for Intel Core Ultra X9 388H and 68/100 for Intel Core Ultra 9 386H.
It's close — Intel Core Ultra X9 388H (69/100) and Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (68/100) score almost the same. Pick based on price and the individual specs that matter most to you; the comparison above shows where each one pulls ahead.

Which would you buy?

Cast your vote