Intel Core Ultra 9 386H vs Intel Xeon Gold 6346

Updated Sep 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score

For most buyers the Intel Xeon Gold 6346 is the better pick — it scores 66/100 to the Intel Core Ultra 9 386H's 63. Choose the Intel Core Ultra 9 386H instead if integrated graphics matters most to you, where it comes out ahead.

Verdict

Our overall take, at a glance

Intel Xeon Gold 6346 and Intel Core Ultra 9 386H are closely matched

Intel Xeon Gold 6346

Intel Core Ultra 9 386H

Where Intel Xeon Gold 6346 stands out

Core Specifications Base Power Consumption: 205 W (720% more)
Core Specifications L3 Cache: 36 MB (100% more)
Core Specifications Threads: 32

Where Intel Core Ultra 9 386H stands out

Core Specifications Maximum Frequency: 4.9 GHz (36% more)
Core Specifications L2 Cache: 24 MB (20% more)

Winner by category for Intel Core Ultra 9 386H vs Intel Xeon Gold 6346
Category	Intel Xeon Gold 6346	Intel Core Ultra 9 386H	Winner
Core Specifications	64	63	Tie
Integrated Graphics	0	44	Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
Benchmark	67	66	Tie

In-depth analysisAI

AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Sep 2026.

Intel Core Ultra 9 386H

The Intel Core Ultra 9 386H is a high-performance mobile processor designed for premium, power-oriented laptop computers. Featuring a robust PassMark CPU Mark score of 44,000, this system-on-chip is engineered to handle demanding computational workloads and heavy multitasking on the go.

Best for Intense multi-threaded workflows such as video rendering, 3D compilation, and…Best for Premium gaming laptops and high-end mobile workstations

Pros

Delivers exceptional multi-threaded performance, validated by a PassMark score of 44,000
Tailored for high-end portable computing setups requiring desktop-class processing power

Cons

High performance potential typically results in increased thermal output and elevated power consumption under load

Intel Xeon Gold 6346

This document provides a list of Intel Xeon processors categorized by generation. The data showcases the evolution of architectures, including P6-based, NetBurst-based, Core-based, and various subsequent series like Sandy Bridge, Haswell, and modern iterations.

Pros

The source details listings for many different generations of Xeon processors.

Cons

Specific models or technical specs for the Intel Xeon Gold 6346 are not provided in the visible section of this list.

Value for Money

Which is the better deal for the price

Enter today's price for each product to see which offers better value. Use the same currency for both.

Intel Core Ultra 9 386H

Check Price on Amazon

Intel Xeon Gold 6346

Check Price on Amazon

Performance

Higher benchmark score = faster

Intel Core Ultra 9 386H36,183

Intel Xeon Gold 634637,277

See the raw benchmark values →

Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.

Review Videos

Hand-picked expert reviews for each product

Detailed Specifications

The full spec sheet, side by side

Core Specifications

Feature	Intel Core Ultra 9 386H	Intel Xeon Gold 6346
Cores	16	16
Threads	16	32
Base Frequency	N/A	3.1 GHz
Base Power Consumption	25 W	205 W720% more
Maximum Frequency	4.9 GHz36% more	3.6 GHz
Maximum Power Consumption	80 W	N/A
L1 Cache	1,600 KB	N/A
L2 Cache	24 MB20% more	20 MB
L3 Cache	18 MB	36 MB100% more
Lithography Process	N/A	10 nm
Is unlocked	N/A	No

Integrated Graphics

Feature	Intel Core Ultra 9 386H	Intel Xeon Gold 6346
Model		N/A

Benchmark

Feature	Intel Core Ultra 9 386H	Intel Xeon Gold 6346
PassMark CPU Mark	36,183	37,2773% more

Specification Note

Specifications are compiled from official manufacturer data and other reliable internet sources. Some features may vary by region or model configuration.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Intel Core Ultra 9 386H vs Intel Xeon Gold 6346 comparison

They are closely matched: Intel Core Ultra 9 386H scores 68/100 and Intel Xeon Gold 6346 scores 68/100 in our overall comparison — within 1 points. Neither is a clear winner overall, so the decision comes down to the specific features and price that matter most to you.

Intel Core Ultra 9 386H and Intel Xeon Gold 6346 are compared side by side above across every spec in the cpus category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 68/100 for Intel Core Ultra 9 386H and 68/100 for Intel Xeon Gold 6346.

It's close — Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (68/100) and Intel Xeon Gold 6346 (68/100) score almost the same. Pick based on price and the individual specs that matter most to you; the comparison above shows where each one pulls ahead.