Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C vs Intel Xeon Gold 6346

Updated Jun 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score

For most buyers the Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C is the better pick — it scores 78/100 to the Intel Xeon Gold 6346's 54, leading on Core Specifications and Benchmark. Choose the Intel Xeon Gold 6346 instead if you want to spend less.

Verdict

Our overall take, at a glance

Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C leads overall

Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C

Intel Xeon Gold 6346

Why it stands out

Core Specifications L2 Cache: 40 MB (100% more)
Benchmark PassMark CPU Mark: 56,202 (51% more)
Core Specifications Cores: 32

Winner by category for Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C vs Intel Xeon Gold 6346
Category	Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C	Intel Xeon Gold 6346	Winner
Core Specifications	62	37	Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C
Integrated Graphics	0	0	Tie
Benchmark	86	62	Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C

In-depth analysisAI

AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Jun 2026.

Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C

This is an Intel Xeon processor part of the Ice Lake-based series, utilizing a dual-processor socket design. The specific model number was not available in the provided sources.

Intel Xeon Gold 6346

This document provides a list of Intel Xeon processors categorized by generation. The data showcases the evolution of architectures, including P6-based, NetBurst-based, Core-based, and various subsequent series like Sandy Bridge, Haswell, and modern iterations.

Pros

The source details listings for many different generations of Xeon processors.

Cons

Specific models or technical specs for the Intel Xeon Gold 6346 are not provided in the visible section of this list.

Value for Money

Which is the better deal for the price

Enter today's price for each product to see which offers better value. Use the same currency for both.

Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C

Check Price on Amazon

Intel Xeon Gold 6346

Check Price on Amazon

Performance

Higher benchmark score = faster

Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C56,202

Intel Xeon Gold 634637,277

See the raw benchmark values →

Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.

Review Videos

Hand-picked expert reviews for each product

Detailed Specifications

The full spec sheet, side by side

Core Specifications

Feature	Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C	Intel Xeon Gold 6346
Cores	32	16
Threads	64	32
Base Frequency	2.9 GHz	3.1 GHz7% more
Base Power Consumption	300 W46% more	205 W
Maximum Frequency	3.5 GHz	3.6 GHz3% more
Maximum Power Consumption	N/A	N/A
L1 Cache	2,560 KB	N/A
L2 Cache	40 MB100% more	20 MB
L3 Cache	54 MB50% more	36 MB
Lithography Process	10 nm	10 nm
Is unlocked	No	No

Integrated Graphics

Feature	Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C	Intel Xeon Gold 6346
Model	N/A	N/A

Benchmark

Feature	Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C	Intel Xeon Gold 6346
PassMark CPU Mark	56,20251% more	37,277

Specification Note

Specifications are compiled from official manufacturer data and other reliable internet sources. Some features may vary by region or model configuration.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C vs Intel Xeon Gold 6346 comparison

Based on our overall comparison score, Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C rates higher at 84/100 versus 68/100 for Intel Xeon Gold 6346 — a 16-point lead. Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C is the stronger overall pick, though the right choice still depends on which specs matter most to you; the full spec table above breaks down every difference.

Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C and Intel Xeon Gold 6346 are compared side by side above across every spec in the cpus category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 84/100 for Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C and 68/100 for Intel Xeon Gold 6346.

If you want the higher-rated cpus option overall, Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C (84/100) edges out Intel Xeon Gold 6346 (68/100). But if Intel Xeon Gold 6346 is cheaper or stronger on the specific specs you care about, it can still be the better buy — use the spec table and strengths profile above to decide.