Intel Core Ultra X7 368H vs Intel Xeon Gold 6248R

Updated Sep 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score

For most buyers the Intel Xeon Gold 6248R is the better pick — it scores 67/100 to the Intel Core Ultra X7 368H's 61, leading on Core Specifications and Benchmark. Choose the Intel Core Ultra X7 368H instead if integrated graphics matters most to you, where it comes out ahead.

Verdict

Our overall take, at a glance

Key takeaways

  • Intel Xeon Gold 6248R leads Intel Core Ultra X7 368H overall by 6 points (67 vs 61 out of 100).
  • Intel Xeon Gold 6248R stands out on Core Specifications Base Power Consumption: 205 W (720% more), Core Specifications L3 Cache: 35.75 MB (99% more), Core Specifications Cores: 24.
Intel Xeon Gold 6248R leads overall
Intel Xeon Gold 6248R
67
Intel Core Ultra X7 368H
61
Why it stands out
  • Core Specifications Base Power Consumption: 205 W (720% more)
  • Core Specifications L3 Cache: 35.75 MB (99% more)
  • Core Specifications Cores: 24

In-depth analysisAI

AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Sep 2026.

Intel Core Ultra X7 368H

The Intel Core Ultra X7 368H is a high-performance mobile processor designed to handle demanding computing workloads. With a PassMark CPU Mark score of 37500, this chip is built for users requiring substantial processing power in portable form factors.

Best for Resource-heavy applications and demanding multitasking workloads
Pros
  • Strong multi-threaded performance with a PassMark score of 37500
  • Capable of handling intensive productivity and creative tasks
Cons
  • Limited official specifications and architectural details are currently available beyond initial benchmark data

Intel Xeon Gold 6248R

This list details various Intel Xeon microprocessors organized by their specific underlying architecture and generation. It serves as an index for generations of processors spanning multiple decades.

Pros
  • The sources provide a chronological overview of Intel Xeon processor developments.
  • Architectures are clearly segregated (e.g., P6-based, Core-based, various series).
Cons
  • The provided source only contains an indexed list and does not offer specific technical details for the Xeon Gold 6248R.

Value for Money

Which is the better deal for the price

Enter today's price for each product to see which offers better value. Use the same currency for both.

Intel Core Ultra X7 368H

Intel Xeon Gold 6248R

Performance

Higher benchmark score = faster

Intel Core Ultra X7 368H33,547
Intel Xeon Gold 6248R36,067

Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.

Detailed Specifications

The full spec sheet, side by side

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Intel Core Ultra X7 368H vs Intel Xeon Gold 6248R comparison

They are closely matched: Intel Core Ultra X7 368H scores 67/100 and Intel Xeon Gold 6248R scores 67/100 in our overall comparison — within 1 points. Neither is a clear winner overall, so the decision comes down to the specific features and price that matter most to you.
Intel Core Ultra X7 368H and Intel Xeon Gold 6248R are compared side by side above across every spec in the cpus category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 67/100 for Intel Core Ultra X7 368H and 67/100 for Intel Xeon Gold 6248R.
It's close — Intel Core Ultra X7 368H (67/100) and Intel Xeon Gold 6248R (67/100) score almost the same. Pick based on price and the individual specs that matter most to you; the comparison above shows where each one pulls ahead.

Which would you buy?

Cast your vote