Intel Xeon Gold 6346 vs Intel Core Ultra X7 368H

Updated Sep 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score

For most buyers the Intel Xeon Gold 6346 is the better pick — it scores 67/100 to the Intel Core Ultra X7 368H's 62, leading on Benchmark. Choose the Intel Core Ultra X7 368H instead if integrated graphics matters most to you, where it comes out ahead.

Verdict

Our overall take, at a glance

Key takeaways

  • Intel Xeon Gold 6346 leads Intel Core Ultra X7 368H overall by 5 points (67 vs 62 out of 100).
  • Intel Xeon Gold 6346 stands out on Core Specifications Base Power Consumption: 205 W (720% more), Core Specifications L3 Cache: 36 MB (100% more), Core Specifications Threads: 32.
Intel Xeon Gold 6346 leads overall
Intel Xeon Gold 6346
67
Intel Core Ultra X7 368H
62
Why it stands out
  • Core Specifications Base Power Consumption: 205 W (720% more)
  • Core Specifications L3 Cache: 36 MB (100% more)
  • Core Specifications Threads: 32

In-depth analysisAI

AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Sep 2026.

Intel Xeon Gold 6346

This document provides a list of Intel Xeon processors categorized by generation. The data showcases the evolution of architectures, including P6-based, NetBurst-based, Core-based, and various subsequent series like Sandy Bridge, Haswell, and modern iterations.

Pros
  • The source details listings for many different generations of Xeon processors.
Cons
  • Specific models or technical specs for the Intel Xeon Gold 6346 are not provided in the visible section of this list.

Intel Core Ultra X7 368H

The Intel Core Ultra X7 368H is a high-performance mobile processor designed to handle demanding computing workloads. With a PassMark CPU Mark score of 37500, this chip is built for users requiring substantial processing power in portable form factors.

Best for Resource-heavy applications and demanding multitasking workloads
Pros
  • Strong multi-threaded performance with a PassMark score of 37500
  • Capable of handling intensive productivity and creative tasks
Cons
  • Limited official specifications and architectural details are currently available beyond initial benchmark data

Value for Money

Which is the better deal for the price

Enter today's price for each product to see which offers better value. Use the same currency for both.

Intel Xeon Gold 6346

Intel Core Ultra X7 368H

Performance

Higher benchmark score = faster

Intel Xeon Gold 634637,277
Intel Core Ultra X7 368H33,547

Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.

Review Videos

Hand-picked expert reviews for each product

Detailed Specifications

The full spec sheet, side by side

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Intel Xeon Gold 6346 vs Intel Core Ultra X7 368H comparison

They are closely matched: Intel Xeon Gold 6346 scores 68/100 and Intel Core Ultra X7 368H scores 67/100 in our overall comparison — within 1 point. Neither is a clear winner overall, so the decision comes down to the specific features and price that matter most to you.
Intel Xeon Gold 6346 and Intel Core Ultra X7 368H are compared side by side above across every spec in the cpus category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 68/100 for Intel Xeon Gold 6346 and 67/100 for Intel Core Ultra X7 368H.
It's close — Intel Xeon Gold 6346 (68/100) and Intel Core Ultra X7 368H (67/100) score almost the same. Pick based on price and the individual specs that matter most to you; the comparison above shows where each one pulls ahead.

Which would you buy?

Cast your vote