Intel Core Ultra X9 388H vs Intel Xeon W 3335

Updated Nov 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score

The Intel Xeon W 3335 and Intel Core Ultra X9 388H are closely matched at 65 and 64/100. The Intel Xeon W 3335 edges ahead on Benchmark, while the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H leads on Core Specifications and Integrated Graphics — pick the one whose strengths match what you'll actually use.

Verdict

Our overall take, at a glance

Intel Xeon W 3335 and Intel Core Ultra X9 388H are closely matched

Intel Xeon W 3335

Intel Core Ultra X9 388H

Where Intel Xeon W 3335 stands out

Core Specifications Base Power Consumption: 250 W (900% more)
Core Specifications Base Frequency: 3.4 GHz (62% more)
Core Specifications Threads: 32

Where Intel Core Ultra X9 388H stands out

Core Specifications Maximum Frequency: 5.1 GHz (27% more)
Core Specifications L1 Cache: 1,600 KB (25% more)
Core Specifications L2 Cache: 24 MB (20% more)

Winner by category for Intel Core Ultra X9 388H vs Intel Xeon W 3335
Category	Intel Xeon W 3335	Intel Core Ultra X9 388H	Winner
Core Specifications	57	62	Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
Integrated Graphics	0	56	Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
Benchmark	70	65	Intel Xeon W 3335

In-depth analysisAI

AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Nov 2026.

Intel Core Ultra X9 388H

The Intel Core Ultra X9 388H is a high-performance mobile processor featuring 16 cores and 16 threads, designed for demanding laptop applications. It scales from a 25-watt base power consumption up to 80 watts maximum, pairing a 5.1 GHz maximum frequency with integrated Intel Arc B390 graphics.

Best for high-performance content creation laptopsBest for demanding mobile computing and gaming systems

Pros

High maximum frequency of 5.1 GHz for demanding workloads
Robust multi-core performance with 16 cores and 16 threads
Generous 24 MB L2 cache and 18 MB L3 cache configuration
Capable Intel Arc B390 integrated graphics

Cons

High power consumption scaling up to 80 watts under maximum load
May require robust laptop thermal solutions to maintain peak performance

Intel Xeon W 3335

The provided source is a comprehensive list of Intel Xeon processors categorized by generation. It tracks the evolution of various processor lines, but it does not provide specific details for the Intel Xeon W 3335 model.

Cons

No specifications or data available for this specific model in the provided source.

Value for Money

Which is the better deal for the price

Enter today's price for each product to see which offers better value. Use the same currency for both.

Intel Core Ultra X9 388H

Check Price on Amazon

Intel Xeon W 3335

Check Price on Amazon

Performance

Higher benchmark score = faster

Intel Core Ultra X9 388H36,504

Intel Xeon W 333539,293

See the raw benchmark values →

Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.

Detailed Specifications

The full spec sheet, side by side

Core Specifications

Feature	Intel Core Ultra X9 388H	Intel Xeon W 3335
Cores	16	16
Threads	16	32
Base Frequency	2.1 GHz	3.4 GHz62% more
Base Power Consumption	25 W	250 W900% more
Maximum Frequency	5.1 GHz27% more	4 GHz
Maximum Power Consumption	80 W	N/A
L1 Cache	1,600 KB25% more	1,280 KB
L2 Cache	24 MB20% more	20 MB
L3 Cache	18 MB	24 MB33% more
Lithography Process	N/A	10 nm
Is unlocked	N/A	No

Integrated Graphics

Feature	Intel Core Ultra X9 388H	Intel Xeon W 3335
Model		N/A

Benchmark

Feature	Intel Core Ultra X9 388H	Intel Xeon W 3335
PassMark CPU Mark	36,504	39,2938% more

Specification Note

Specifications are compiled from official manufacturer data and other reliable internet sources. Some features may vary by region or model configuration.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Intel Core Ultra X9 388H vs Intel Xeon W 3335 comparison

They are closely matched: Intel Core Ultra X9 388H scores 69/100 and Intel Xeon W 3335 scores 69/100 in our overall comparison — within 1 points. Neither is a clear winner overall, so the decision comes down to the specific features and price that matter most to you.

Intel Core Ultra X9 388H and Intel Xeon W 3335 are compared side by side above across every spec in the cpus category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 69/100 for Intel Core Ultra X9 388H and 69/100 for Intel Xeon W 3335.

It's close — Intel Core Ultra X9 388H (69/100) and Intel Xeon W 3335 (69/100) score almost the same. Pick based on price and the individual specs that matter most to you; the comparison above shows where each one pulls ahead.