Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C vs Intel Xeon Gold 6278C

Updated Jun 2026 · Scored by the Let’s Compare Data Engine · How we score

For most buyers the Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C is the better pick — it scores 78/100 to the Intel Xeon Gold 6278C's 50, leading on Core Specifications and Benchmark. Choose the Intel Xeon Gold 6278C instead if you want to spend less.

Verdict

Our overall take, at a glance

Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C leads overall

Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C

Intel Xeon Gold 6278C

Why it stands out

Benchmark PassMark CPU Mark: 56,202 (71% more)
Core Specifications Base Power Consumption: 300 W (62% more)
Core Specifications L1 Cache: 2,560 KB (54% more)

Winner by category for Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C vs Intel Xeon Gold 6278C
Category	Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C	Intel Xeon Gold 6278C	Winner
Core Specifications	60	36	Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C
Integrated Graphics	0	0	Tie
Benchmark	87	56	Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C

In-depth analysisAI

AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Jun 2026.

Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C

This is an Intel Xeon processor part of the Ice Lake-based series, utilizing a dual-processor socket design. The specific model number was not available in the provided sources.

Intel Xeon Gold 6278C

The Intel Xeon Gold 6278C is one of a long list of generation-specific Intel Xeon microprocessors. These processors are designed for enterprise and data center applications, supporting various compute loads.

Best for Data CenterBest for Enterprise Compute

Pros

Supports the Gold tier designation (Source 1)

Value for Money

Which is the better deal for the price

Enter today's price for each product to see which offers better value. Use the same currency for both.

Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C

Check Price on Amazon

Intel Xeon Gold 6278C

Check Price on Amazon

Performance

Higher benchmark score = faster

Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C56,202

Intel Xeon Gold 6278C32,835

See the raw benchmark values →

Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.

Detailed Specifications

The full spec sheet, side by side

Core Specifications

Feature	Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C	Intel Xeon Gold 6278C
Cores	32	26
Threads	64	52
Base Frequency	2.9 GHz12% more	2.6 GHz
Base Power Consumption	300 W62% more	185 W
Maximum Frequency	3.5 GHz	3.5 GHz
Maximum Power Consumption	N/A	N/A
L1 Cache	2,560 KB54% more	1,664 KB
L2 Cache	40 MB54% more	26 MB
L3 Cache	54 MB51% more	35.75 MB
Lithography Process	10 nm29% less	14 nm
Is unlocked	No	No

Integrated Graphics

Feature	Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C	Intel Xeon Gold 6278C
Model	N/A	N/A

Benchmark

Feature	Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C	Intel Xeon Gold 6278C
PassMark CPU Mark	56,20271% more	32,835

Specification Note

Specifications are compiled from official manufacturer data and other reliable internet sources. Some features may vary by region or model configuration.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C vs Intel Xeon Gold 6278C comparison

Based on our overall comparison score, Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C rates higher at 84/100 versus 65/100 for Intel Xeon Gold 6278C — a 19-point lead. Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C is the stronger overall pick, though the right choice still depends on which specs matter most to you; the full spec table above breaks down every difference.

Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C and Intel Xeon Gold 6278C are compared side by side above across every spec in the cpus category — including performance, features and design — each scored 0–100 so you can see exactly where one leads the other. Our overall scores are 84/100 for Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C and 65/100 for Intel Xeon Gold 6278C.

If you want the higher-rated cpus option overall, Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C (84/100) edges out Intel Xeon Gold 6278C (65/100). But if Intel Xeon Gold 6278C is cheaper or stronger on the specific specs you care about, it can still be the better buy — use the spec table and strengths profile above to decide.